Jump to content

What Will The Orioles Do With Wade Miley?


PressBoxOnline

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Mitch Connor said:

We have needed an upgrade to our rotation since Dan got here, and what has he done to address this issue? 

When he got here, he signed Chen, signed Gonzalez and traded for Hammel.    Then he traded for Joe Saunders in August.     All excellent moves.     But pretty much nothing he's done since then had any useful impact.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

It is kinda sad that someone with a 5.13 FIP can be seen as a huge upgrade.  I'm not at all sure that Miranda is actually good.

I doubt he is good. Plus pitching in a better environment, that said Miley has been a disappointment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

When he got here, he signed Chen, signed Gonzalez and traded for Hammel.    Then he traded for Joe Saunders in August.     All excellent moves.     But pretty much nothing he's done since then had any useful impact.   

Right, he hit on a bunch early on and has basically whiffed since. I didn't mind in general what he gave up it is what we got back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'd just like to say Fister has had two starts, gone 11 innings and has a WHIP of 1.545.  And that is with a K rate of 9.0.

I'm not convinced that Fister would have been the answer either.  But given how bad the O's rotation has been, Dan should have been exploring every possible angle to bring in options.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

When he got here, he signed Chen, signed Gonzalez and traded for Hammel.    Then he traded for Joe Saunders in August.     All excellent moves.     But pretty much nothing he's done since then had any useful impact.   

Excellent may be pushing it. They were all bottom of the rotation pieces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mitch Connor said:

Excellent may be pushing it. They were all bottom of the rotation pieces.

They were far from excellent, but they weren't bottom of the rotation either. I don't think you actually followed the 2012 and 2014 seasons closely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, LA2 said:

They were far from excellent, but they weren't bottom of the rotation either. I don't think you actually followed the 2012 and 2014 seasons closely.

At best they were #3 starters for our rotation. Most other contenders they would have been 4 or 5. I'm just saying Dan has never got us a real 1 or 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mitch Connor said:

At best they were #3 starters for our rotation. Most other contenders they would have been 4 or 5. I'm just saying Dan has never got us a real 1 or 2.

How in the world in the AL East can Dan find a true number 1 unless he is drafted? Cashman didn't find CC Sabathia, the Steinbrenner's wallet did. 

 

1 hour ago, Mitch Connor said:

Excellent may be pushing it. They were all bottom of the rotation pieces.

Chen was above average for 4 seasons and so was Miguel for close to 3 full seasons and were dirt cheap. Without those two, 2012 and 2014 never happen. Those were the best and most important moves in the DD era.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

How in the world in the AL East can Dan find a true number 1 unless he is drafted? Cashman didn't find CC Sabathia, the Steinbrenner's wallet did. 

 

Chen was above average for 4 seasons and so was Miguel for close to 3 full seasons and were dirt cheap. Without those two, 2012 and 2014 never happen. Those were the best and most important moves in the DD era.  

He may have been able to find one thru trading, except our minor league system lacks trade chips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mitch Connor said:

He may have been able to find one thru trading, except our minor league system lacks trade chips.

You are correct, no question that is another way.  He gets no help from his owner.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eddie83 said:

You are correct, no question that is another way.  He gets no help from his owner.  

He has a near $170m payroll that has gone up every year since Duquette has been the GM. Can we stop the Angelos bashing re: payroll. This team is Duquette's mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...