Jump to content

The O's have plenty to trade


wildcard

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, SteveA said:

And they have had less postseason success than we have.

Yes, but I think that's beside the point concerning what birdwatcher55 was getting at.    And to be fair, the Nats look like they'll continue to be legit contenders over the next several years, so they'll get some more shots at postseason success, while we may not have any for a while.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Anyone who says that Angelos will not spend on Machado and/or Britton is talking out of their backside.

 

The resigning of Davis and Trumbo indicates the willingness to spend money.

 

I don't think its a certainty, but I do think we have a chance. I don't think Manny has performed like a 30 million dollar player this year, and I would be hesitant to give Manny that type of dough.

 

I agree that we should decide soon on a path and trading the veterans on this team would be the right move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don't think Manny has performed like a 30 million dollar player this year, and I would be hesitant to give Manny that type of dough.

It's precisely because Manny is having a down year that I think we should try to sign him now.     There's risk involved, but the price should be lower than it was last offseason.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It's precisely because Manny is having a down year that I think we should try to sign him now.     There's risk involved, but the price should be lower than it was last offseason.   

Do you think it's really lower?  Wouldn't his agent just point to Harper and show that he can bounce back before FA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even with Manny's value down I'd still trade him rather then resign him. With long term money already going to Davis I'd rather not see the team turn into the Phillies where they have tons of money invested in a few players. Rather dump Trumbo's contract and trade Manny, giving the team payroll flexibility along with an influx of young talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Davis contract does indicate a willingness to spend, but $160 million is a lot different than the $300 million or more Manny will probably be looking for. Even though he is having a down year I don't see Manny signing a contract extension, I think he is content playing out 2018 and hitting free agency.

Thats where Duquette and the front office need to be proactive and make a decision. Are they ok letting him play out the contract and walk for a comp pick, or is there a real effort being made to lock him up long term. IMO letting him play out the contract is bad for the future of the franchise, we can't afford to just let him walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Since we have a few guys leaving for FA this season, can we get anything for them?

Kim?

Castillo?

Better a middling prospect than nothing.

Lower minors lottery tickets.  I'll take those all day for pending free agents with minimal value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Lower minors lottery tickets.  I'll take those all day for pending free agents with minimal value. 

Might be able to get some older prospects who are blocked at the MLB level for awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Maybe you get your wish. He handed $26 mil to Davis. That will be a lot of coin for two players.

It was a good sign, but honestly he might have signed the wrong player to a megadeal. I just want the O's to keep Britton, Machado and Schoop here as long as we can

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...