Jump to content

You're DD and PA says to "buy"


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

Mr. owner (insert your name here). I know you don't like releasing players under contract. While you might disagree with my actions, I am the GM and as GM, I'm fulfilling YOUR wish, while acting on mine. If you aren't happy with it, fire me..sir!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think my first question to PA would be "Do you care about the condition of the organization after 2018, or only about the next three months?"  And plan according to the answer.

I don't think that DD's reputation is going to be tarnished that much from here on out.  He's proven he belongs in the GM role, so he does the best he can and , like any prisoner, he does what he's told and systematically crosses the days off his wall calendar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, backwardsk said:

Who fits that description (Miranda)? Most guys in that age range have been exposed (like Wright, Wilson, Verrett, etc.) Lee, maybe (?)

If I was instructed to sell, Sisco would be my chip.  Mountcastle, Hays, Akin, Scott are most likely "no"s.

Yeah, that's the problem. But you never know who a team might be interested in. Heck, I didn't think Miranda himself had any trade value before he was dealt. Of course, part of it might be that the M's just wanted to dump Miley's contract. Maybe that would be part of my buying strategy, too -- give up a lesser prospect in exchange for taking on a bigger contract. If PA is forcing me to buy, the least he can do is let me take on more money if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Drifter said:

I buy Ubaldo a one-way ticket to anywhere in the world he wants to go. Yea, he's a nice guy, but enough is enough. It's time to move on.

And he will get some coaching and advice and become the next Arrieta :/:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd ask him to give me one year to retool and trade machado and Britton at the deadline among others.

All angelos wants to do is sell tickets. I promise a competitive season next year while not having to buy now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does dealing Britton for a young starter who is ML proven and better than the back end of our rotation (not a big hurdle) and under team control longer than Britton count as buying?

The hypothetical starter would improve our rotation immediately, which is obviously the team's biggest weakness.  So in that sense it IS buying.  But a deal like that also helps us in 2018, 2019, however long the guy is under team control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If the team is in shambles when his contract is up it might impact his ability to get another job.

Maybe, although getting 5 straight winning seasons out of a team that had 14 straight losing seasons still looks pretty good.  

Buy his age, and personality might not work for him in job interviews.  Obviously Toronto was interested a few years ago, but I don't think there will be a huge market for him after this contract.  But all it takes is one team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PaulFolk said:

If I were forced to buy, I hate to say it, but I'd make more Miranda-for-Miley type trades -- and hopefully they'd turn out better than that one did. In other words, I'd trade a guy who's considered a fringe prospect (as Miranda was) for a guy who at least has a track record of being an average major leaguer (as Miley was). Don't touch the top prospects like Hays, Mullins, Mountcastle, and Akin.

How come there aren't any thread on here about how Miranda is 7-4 with a 3.82 ERA? He'd be our #1 starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rojo13 said:

How come there aren't any thread on here about how Miranda is 7-4 with a 3.82 ERA? He'd be our #1 starter.

I am guessing if you put Miranda in front of the O's defense at OPACY his ERA would be a lot closer to his FIP of 5.14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...