Jump to content

Giavotella Recalled


Lucky_13

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
On 7/6/2017 at 6:50 PM, ChuckS said:

 

Schoop played a lot of SS in the minors as well. 2B to SS is an easier transition than 2B to 3B IMO. Balls are hit it at a similar speed, bounces are similar. And Schoop certainly has the arm for it so maybe an alignment with Schoop at SS is worth trying.  

 

 

 

On 7/6/2017 at 10:55 PM, ChuckS said:

 

Did I call it ???

 

 

 

On 7/6/2017 at 11:20 PM, OFFNY said:

o

CHUCK S

o

o

 

And Schoop started at shortstop today, also.

Way to go, Chuck ........ you must have ESPN, or something.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PaulFolk said:

If the Orioles are doing this to see if Schoop can be a viable SS, in preparation for next year, then I can see the reasoning behind it. I don't think it'll work -- Schoop probably doesn't have the range for SS -- but maybe it's worth a try since the O's will need a SS.

But if the Orioles are doing this solely to get Giavotella into the lineup instead of Tejada, it makes no sense. In their careers, Tejada is just as good a hitter if not better than him. Giavotella has a bit better SLG, but Tejada has the better OBP. And Tejada is two years younger.

I don't think they like Tejada at the plate or in the field very much or maybe even at all. I think they are trying this just to see if they can eek out a little edge until their starting SS gets off the DL. They are getting a little desperate to catch some lightening in a bottle to jump start things and rightfully so IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OFFNY said:

 

 

 

 

o

 

And Schoop started at shortstop today, also.

Way to go, Chuck ........ you must have ESPN, or something.

 

o

Given that Schoop is a natural shortstop and arm strength matters more at that position than 2B I would not be surprised if his metrics there improve a little bit. 

He's going to have below average range at either position, so it's possible Schoop won't hurt us at SS any more than at second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lucky_13 said:

Can Drew Dosch play 2nd?

At least he's a fringe prospect who might have potential. Better than more retreads

Dosch has 14 errors in 64 games at 3B in AAA. Only a .925 fielding %. 

I like Dosch, but he's probably fringe with the bat and below average with the glove. Give him a year though. 

The guy to watch for next ST is Wilkerson. He could be our Util guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...