Jump to content

Cubs target again?


Thats Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
On 11/27/2017 at 12:39 PM, billw76 said:

If the package includes Machado I'd rather get Baez and have him play 3B with Beckham at SS and Schoop at 2B. That should keep the IF fairly solid without leaving another hole to fill at 3B. I know Baez will be a downgrade defensively from Manny, but I like him better there than moving Davis, Schoop or Beckham over there and I don't like the thought of trying to sign Moustakas or Frazier.

Baez is no defensive downgrade. He's a shortstop who plays other positions. He might be better than Machado.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I know they've been interested in the past with Gausman, but I think they'll be aiming considerably higher on the totem pole than Gausman should they trade for pitching. They need a top of the rotation arm for the playoffs.

Maybe they think Gausman can be that "top of the rotation" arm?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tryptamine said:

I know they've been interested in the past with Gausman, but I think they'll be aiming considerably higher on the totem pole than Gausman should they trade for pitching. They need a top of the rotation arm for the playoffs.

Well that strategy certainly worked out well for them with Arrieta...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • He'll go back to pulling pitches and hit 30 HRs there.
    • I tend to agree with this.  We certainly aren't the best farm system any more and it's time to use Uncle Dave's money some.  I'm in favor of buying the pitching we need.  There are some good FA arms out there.  If there's a bat on another team they want to trade for that's different since the FA position player list isn't good.
    • This what I think happens too.  We'll trade from the FV 40ish tier not the 45 or higher tier.  And I can see dealing from the top ofthe deck (i.e. Mounty, Urias, Kremer*...) to build the ceiling of the pipeljne or weaker/thinner positions.  *A Kremer based deal would be predicated on an FA SP signing.  I don't see it happening but it's an interesting case study.
    • Maybe he should be a free agent target this offseason. 
    • Hays hit .354 / .404 / .537 against LH pitching this season. I would absolutely take him back as a platoon player who can fill in all three OF positions. Given the number of southpaws other teams throw against us we'd be nuts not to consider signing him if he gets DFA'd. 
    • I went and checked how we compared to other playoff teams in platooning and pinch-hitting during the playoffs.  I used the first two wildcard games as the sample to keep it apples to apples with the Orioles’ experience.  For the 8 wildcard teams, I counted the number of line-up changes from game 1 to game 2 and the number of pinch hit PAs and added them together.  For lineup changes, I didn’t consider batting order or positions, only the number of hitters that started game 1 but didn’t start game 2 (only McCann for the Orioles). The Orioles were middle of the pack - 4th highest moves among the 8 wildcard teams. #       Team                Lineup changes Pinch hits PAs Total        T1 Tigers 3 5 8            T1 Astros 1 7 8 3 Mets 1 6 7 4 Orioles 1 5 6 5 Royals 1 4 5 6 Braves 1 2 3 7 Brewers 1 1 2 8 Padres 0 0 0 For some additional context, only the Orioles and Tigers faced different-handed starters the first two games AND had opposing pitcher handedness change at least 5 times in those games. Teams that faced same-hand starter both days: Royals Astros Mets Braves   Number times opposing pitcher handedness changed in game: Astros - 8 Royals - 8 Orioles - 5 Tigers - 5 Mets - 4 Padres - 3 Braves - 2 Brewers - 1 
    • If Hays is non tendered he will be looking for the team that will play him full time.     And he might find it.   He in not even 30 yet.   But the O's don't have that to offer him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...