Jump to content

Connolly: Six Moves the Orioles Should Make


Yardball85

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
54 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Okay, so it was 2016.

Ubaldo pitched his arse off, last 6 starts, the team went 5-1 and threw a CG.

 

It was great that he did that.   However, if he hadn’t gone 5-11 with a 6.62 ERA before that point in the season, we wouldn’t have needed him to pitch so well in his final six starts for the team to make the playoffs.   His overall season was still pretty horrific despite his hot finish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It was great that he did that.   However, if he hadn’t gone 5-11 with a 6.62 ERA before that point in the season, we wouldn’t have needed him to pitch so well in his final six starts for the team to make the playoffs.   His overall season was still pretty horrific despite his hot finish.

Point taken.

Ubaldo never came close to consistent enough for the money paid him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really didn't like Connollys article that much.  I mean it's off season so any speculation is fun, but the six items were just sorta meh.  I would have been interested in his thoughts on say how his six ideas would or could work.

1) Extend Schoop - Ok what would that look like?  Im in for 6/85 or so but many in Frobbys Poll think the number required would be higher.  Of course extending Schoop is a reasonable move....but cost would factor in too right?

2)  Sign/Trade Manny is probably his most complete thought.  I think most of us are on board even if we are sea sick.

3)  Sign Cashner.  Well, I think this is debatable, but here he at least puts some numbers in.  He thinks Cashner is the best starter available for 3 years.  I just do not agree.

4)  Tillman - I was in the let him walk camp, but given the numbers, I think a 1 year deal ASAP is the easiest to accomplish of the 6 moves in Connolly's article.  Whether it is smart is debatable, but if we down to grasping straws, this is at least a potentially cheap one with upside.

5) Sign Jon Jay, his argument is reasonable I guess, given the O's stated interest in a LH bat, but the team has a bunch of kids they need to play and too many batters they have to keep.  Adding another old guy hurts way more than it helps. Even if

6)  Trade Mark Trumbo.  The Orioles traded for him and his 9MM salary for a third string catcher.  His 13MM salary is not being moved in a trade unless its part of a $ deal where we pay anyway (Which I would be ok with) or we take someone elses bad deal.  I will agree that the bloated number looks more reasonable if as Connolly suggests his numbers are in-between his last two years.  The Trumbo problem is simply this.  His acquisition to replace Davis was brilliant.  His resigning after the 161MM commitment to Davis is suspect and having them both seemingly bolted to the lineup daily requires a suspension of rationality.  Sure they could both be massively better in 18 than 17.  But no rational team should invest 36MM or so to count on that, and fact is that moving him should be the number 2 priority on the team, after of course coming up with pitching.

There is no path forward in my opinion competitive or rebuilding, where Trumbo/Davis together make sense.  And I really like both of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...