Jump to content

O's equivalent to the Gerrit Cole trade?


ScGO's

Recommended Posts

Joe Musgrove, Colin Moran, Michael Feliz, and Jason Martin for Gerrit Cole.

What would have been the closest thing to an O's match?

Musgrove - Hard for the O's to match an MLB ready starter at his age.  However, his ceiling isn't overly high at this point.  He's not MLB ready, but Wells? Maybe Castro if they like him as a SP? Ynoa is the closest thing to a young MLB ready starter we have, eh. Maybe the 1st round luster of Sedlock hasn't worn off yet.

Moran - If they are looking for pop in a bat first prospect, maybe Santander or Reyes, but again Moran is 24 and more polished.  I don't see his ceiling being all too high either.  I say Santander as he is closer to MLB ready, and it frees a spot for one of our new Rule V guys.

Feliz -Relief pitcher who racks up the K's, but isn't very valuable yet.  Maybe Yacabonis?

Jason Martin - Seems comparable to a Cedric Mullins although Martin isn't playing much CF.  Maybe Stewart?

 

So would something like a Sedlock, Ynoa, Santander, Mullins, and Yacabonis have beaten out Houston?  Too much for O's to give up?

If not, what sort of pitcher could we realistically get back for a package similar to the above?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

Joe Musgrove, Colin Moran, Michael Feliz, and Jason Martin for Gerrit Cole.

What would have been the closest thing to an O's match?

Musgrove - Hard for the O's to match an MLB ready starter at his age.  However, his ceiling isn't overly high at this point.  He's not MLB ready, but Wells? Maybe Castro if they like him as a SP? Ynoa is the closest thing to a young MLB ready starter we have, eh. Maybe the 1st round luster of Sedlock hasn't worn off yet.

Moran - If they are looking for pop in a bat first prospect, maybe Santander or Reyes, but again Moran is 24 and more polished.  I don't see his ceiling being all too high either.  I say Santander as he is closer to MLB ready, and it frees a spot for one of our new Rule V guys.

Feliz -Relief pitcher who racks up the K's, but isn't very valuable yet.  Maybe Yacabonis?

Jason Martin - Seems comparable to a Cedric Mullins although Martin isn't playing much CF.  Maybe Stewart?

 

So would something like a Sedlock, Ynoa, Santander, Mullins, and Yacabonis have beaten out Houston?  Too much for O's to give up?

If not, what sort of pitcher could we realistically get back for a package similar to the above?

Musgrove? That's Hunter Harvey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

Joe Musgrove, Colin Moran, Michael Feliz, and Jason Martin for Gerrit Cole.

What would have been the closest thing to an O's match?

Musgrove - Hard for the O's to match an MLB ready starter at his age.  However, his ceiling isn't overly high at this point.  He's not MLB ready, but Wells? Maybe Castro if they like him as a SP? Ynoa is the closest thing to a young MLB ready starter we have, eh. Maybe the 1st round luster of Sedlock hasn't worn off yet.

Moran - If they are looking for pop in a bat first prospect, maybe Santander or Reyes, but again Moran is 24 and more polished.  I don't see his ceiling being all too high either.  I say Santander as he is closer to MLB ready, and it frees a spot for one of our new Rule V guys.

Feliz -Relief pitcher who racks up the K's, but isn't very valuable yet.  Maybe Yacabonis?

Jason Martin - Seems comparable to a Cedric Mullins although Martin isn't playing much CF.  Maybe Stewart?

 

So would something like a Sedlock, Ynoa, Santander, Mullins, and Yacabonis have beaten out Houston?  Too much for O's to give up?

If not, what sort of pitcher could we realistically get back for a package similar to the above?

2

Sedlock, Ynoa, Santander, Mullins, and Yacabonis would get you a Cashner level guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

Joe Musgrove, Colin Moran, Michael Feliz, and Jason Martin for Gerrit Cole.

What would have been the closest thing to an O's match?

Musgrove - Hard for the O's to match an MLB ready starter at his age.  However, his ceiling isn't overly high at this point.  He's not MLB ready, but Wells? Maybe Castro if they like him as a SP? Ynoa is the closest thing to a young MLB ready starter we have, eh. Maybe the 1st round luster of Sedlock hasn't worn off yet.

Moran - If they are looking for pop in a bat first prospect, maybe Santander or Reyes, but again Moran is 24 and more polished.  I don't see his ceiling being all too high either.  I say Santander as he is closer to MLB ready, and it frees a spot for one of our new Rule V guys.

Feliz -Relief pitcher who racks up the K's, but isn't very valuable yet.  Maybe Yacabonis?

Jason Martin - Seems comparable to a Cedric Mullins although Martin isn't playing much CF.  Maybe Stewart?

 

So would something like a Sedlock, Ynoa, Santander, Mullins, and Yacabonis have beaten out Houston?  Too much for O's to give up?

If not, what sort of pitcher could we realistically get back for a package similar to the above?

I'll take a go at it. 

Musgrove was a solid prospect, top 10 org guy in a strong system, but never a top 100 guy.  He's been OK as a reliever/swingman.

Colin Moran was a borderline top 100 guy, then fell off the map, and then had a strong 2017 in AAA.

Feliz, top ten guy in the system, don't think he was a top 100 guy, maybe backend.  Has been a reliever with good peripherals, bad results.

Jason Martin, fringe prospect.

So it's hard to line it up with all the players being similar, but here goes.

Mancini (more valuable than Moran).

Keegan Akin  - (less valuable than Musgrove)

Miguel Castro - similar to Feliz 

Ademar Rifaela - similar to Martin

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

Harvey, Lee, Mullins, and Santander. I would have done that for Cole.

I don't know how other teams value Harvey, but I wouldn't be surprised if he is completely off limits.  I remember watching Bundy after his TJS, and man, the command was worse, the stuff was worse than pre-surgery.  Harvey looks amazing, he's getting to the same velocity and stuff with less effort already.  If he gets 80-100 healthy innings next year, I'd bet he's a top 25 prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weams said:

No one is trading Cole for that. 

Not saying the Pirates would do that (Lee is super fringe) but The Astros package was kind of poor.  Musgrove was the top piece and he might be a backend starter. Moran might be a regular 3B. Feliz is pretty much Miguel Castro.  Martin is Ademar Rifaela (COF, some pop, holes in the swing, rule 5 eligible but not selected). 

If I was the Pirates I'd want more upside from the top piece. I'd be hard for a team to take Harvey as a centerpiece because of the riskiness, but Harvey is a better prospect than Moran by a fair margin even considering the risk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I don't know how other teams value Harvey, but I wouldn't be surprised if he is completely off limits.  I remember watching Bundy after his TJS, and man, the command was worse, the stuff was worse than pre-surgery.  Harvey looks amazing, he's getting to the same velocity and stuff with less effort already.  If he gets 80-100 healthy innings next year, I'd bet he's a top 25 prospect.

Good stuff. Thanks. I really hope Harvey does work out for the Orioles. If he can become at worst a 2 or 3 and Sedlock can become at east a 3 or 4, add that to Bundy and Gausman. Suddenly, the rotation looks alot better in 2 years. Health being the key.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I'll take a go at it. 

Musgrove was a solid prospect, top 10 org guy in a strong system, but never a top 100 guy.  He's been OK as a reliever/swingman.

Colin Moran was a borderline top 100 guy, then fell off the map, and then had a strong 2017 in AAA.

Feliz, top ten guy in the system, don't think he was a top 100 guy, maybe backend.  Has been a reliever with good peripherals, bad results.

Jason Martin, fringe prospect.

So it's hard to line it up with all the players being similar, but here goes.

Mancini (more valuable than Moran).

Keegan Akin  - (less valuable than Musgrove)

Miguel Castro - similar to Feliz 

Ademar Rifaela - similar to Martin

 

Moran was a 51-74 rated prospect depending on what service as far back as 2014. His main problem is he was blocked in Houston.

im betting he’s a solid MLB player and I think you’ve undervalued him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Moran was a 51-74 rated prospect depending on what service as far back as 2014. His main problem is he was blocked in Houston.

im betting he’s a solid MLB player and I think you’ve undervalued him 

He very well could be, but he dropped out of the top 100 and then out of the Astros top ten, not because he was blocked but because he had a  <.700 OPS in the PCL in 2016.  He had a bounceback in 2017 but he was also 24 and repeating AAA.  He could flame out against major league pitching too.  I think his median outcome is a 45/50 type guy (1.5-2.0 WAR player). Mancini has already had a MLB season of that level, I think it's fair to say Mancini is clearly more valuable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...