Jump to content

Buck, Dan and ownership need to deal with the Davis issue first


Pat Kelly

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Mental competence aside, my impression is that Angelos has never had the emotional makeup that would enable him to  conclude (and certainly not to admit) that he's made a mistake, let alone feel shame or remorse or regret for what he appears to view as his generous and noble actions and decisions (that is,  pretty much all his actions and decisions).

And my guess is that, whatever his role was in the Davis, Trumbo, Tillman  or other decisions that shaped this team, Buck -- another guy who I've never heard own up to having made a mistake even though he's made plenty and they're right there for the rest of his see --  today views himself as a manager who faces the impossible assignment of winning with the crappy 40-man and 25-man roster the organization has given him and who's been let down by some real bad performances that nobody could have expected. 

Well can't say I feel to sorry for Buck, I think he's had a major influence on his 25 guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 264
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Ya'll are getting ahead of yourself. Step 1 is to bench Davis. Ideally for the rest of the season. Then after making him ride pine for 4+ months you approach him in the off season and tell him he can either do this for four more years or negotiate a buy out. Maybe he's fine just continuing to collect that pay check. Or maybe his pride kicks in. What I do know is that as long as they continue to play him there's no reason for him to even consider a buy out. 

Also, let's not forget that the Orioles gave him this money and this contract. It's 100% on them for not effectively scouting and evaluating their own players talent before extending him such a ridiculous offer. And if Buck was the one pushing for the signing then I seriously question his ability to evaluate talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Ya'll are getting ahead of yourself. Step 1 is to bench Davis. Ideally for the rest of the season. Then after making him ride pine for 4+ months you approach him in the off season and tell him he can either do this for four more years or negotiate a buy out. Maybe he's fine just continuing to collect that pay check. Or maybe his pride kicks in. What I do know is that as long as they continue to play him there's no reason for him to even consider a buy out. 

Also, let's not forget that the Orioles gave him this money and this contract. It's 100% on them for not effectively scouting and evaluating their own players talent before extending him such a ridiculous offer. And if Buck was the one pushing for the signing then I seriously question his ability to evaluate talent. 

If he was that proud, he'd realize he's made a lot of money in baseball, has a wonderful family and would retire.    Here in the real world, he keeps striking out 2 or 3 times a game, hits an occasional home run, plays a decent, but declining, first base, and collects his paycheck.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

If he was that proud, he'd realize he's made a lot of money in baseball, has a wonderful family and would retire.    Here in the real world, he keeps striking out 2 or 3 times a game, hits an occasional home run, plays a decent, but declining, first base, and collects his paycheck.  

They need to make him uncomfortable. That starts with benching him. It also makes the team better. Win win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

They need to make him uncomfortable. That starts with benching him. It also makes the team better. Win win. 

I can't argue with benching him.   If he was making the Major League minimum, he'd be riding pine or released at this point.  

At some point, he's going to have to be realized as a "sunk cost" and just released.   Also, at this point, do we hope that he somehow "figures it out" and just keep running him out there?   We aren't in contention, and that could be a true "win" in that scenario.  The likelihood of that happening is super slim to none, but what do we have to lose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, InsideCoroner said:

Right. If anything, it could be argued he looks like someone who used to be on the juice — but then stopped.

I simply don’t understand why his bat (and exit velocity) has been slowing down steadily since 2015. 

Jayson Heyward anyone?  My diagnosis is a terrible, terrible disease called bigpaydayitis.  Sufferers believe this disease can only be cured by strict abstemiousness and general clean living for the duration of the pay day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

They need to make him uncomfortable. That starts with benching him. It also makes the team better. Win win. 

I think there's a difference between benching Davis and giving up on him. Bench him, absolutely, just like you'd bench any player who performed this badly for this long.

But don't give up on him. Think creatively and exhaustively about ways in which he might be fixed -- coaching, counseling, legal medication, lasik surgery, new diet or workout regimen -- or hire somebody who can brainstorm that for you. Pursue during the season or next off-season any or all of them.

There are three reasons to throw some more time and money at this huge investment, maybe more. First, it might help (though it feels like the chances are slim). Second, if it doesn't work that should help convince Chris over the next few months that he's just not a ML ballplayer anymore. Third, if Chris becomes convinced of that it might help lead to a buy-out/voluntary retirement/other resolution of his contract a year or two down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I think there's a difference between benching Davis and giving up on him. Bench him, absolutely, just like you'd bench any player who performed this badly for this long.

But don't give up on him. Think creatively and exhaustively about ways in which he might be fixed -- coaching, counseling, legal medication, lasik surgery, new diet or workout regimen -- or hire somebody who can brainstorm that for you. Pursue during the season or next off-season any or all of them.

There are three reasons to throw some more time and money at this huge investment, maybe more. First, it might help (though it feels like the chances are slim). Second, if it doesn't work that should help convince Chris over the next few months that he's just not a ML ballplayer anymore. Third, if Chris becomes convinced of that it might help lead to a buy-out/voluntary retirement/other resolution of his contract a year or two down the road.

Can they demote him and let him work out his issues at AAA? Or is it one of those situations where he'd refuse a MLB assignment? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Richmond Bird 9 said:

I think he has too much MLB service time to send him down. They can ask and he can say NO or yes.

Maybe it's another move worth making (to make him uncomfortable). Make him refuse the assignment. Make him be the bad guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Richmond Bird 9 said:

I think he has too much MLB service time to send him down. They can ask and he can say NO or yes.

I just checked and anyone who has accrued more than 5 years of MLB time can refuse an assignment so you're absolutely right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, InsideCoroner said:

Right. If anything, it could be argued he looks like someone who used to be on the juice — but then stopped.

I simply don’t understand why his bat (and exit velocity) has been slowing down steadily since 2015. 

What about Jason Heyward? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/20/2018 at 11:21 AM, TINSTAAPP said:

I don't think Davis' problems are that complicated. He has the worst pitch recognition skills in baseball and he can't beat the shift which has gotten into his head. I guess you can do something about the latter but what can be done about his inability to tell the difference between a ball and strike? I don't think he's fixable at this point. 

I think his chief problems are that his bat as slowed down.. a lot.  That and his swing has huge holes in it which doesn't lend itself to making consistent contact, which is compounded by a very slow bat speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the Union wants the rank and file to have the right to reject a demotion to protect clubs from absurd service time manipulations, but Davis is really growing into an interesting test case - the Union couldn't really object to the Orioles trying to demote him now.  Whether the goal is to make him feel uncomfortable, or to help the team, he's playing his way towards an earned attempt at demotion and rejecting it would cost him some fan goodwill.  Long-term, it might even be in his best interest to baby step back towards success without the MLB spotlight and with easier pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Another successful all Oriole grid, 36 rarity points:
    • He was allowed to face LHP.  My post wasn’t disagreeing with your post.  I was saying that not only did we let him face LHP, we let him do so despite not having much success against LHP.  I was pushing back against the narrative that we needlessly platooned Cowser.  Not only did we not platoon him, there is a reasonable argument that we should have platooned more than we did. We needed to play one of Mullins and Cowser in CF. Cowser mostly got the call vs. LHP because he was much better against LHP in the first half of the year, but this flipped in the second half.
    • From Adley to Basallo, I think Elias has eight Bats I hope we get to see all take 600 PA simultaneously some season. Adley was born in 1998, and until he arrived Elias Orioles baseball was bad by design.    For flavor, leaders of those teams like 1994-1997 births Mullins, Santander, Hays and Mountcastle are all between 10th and 20th among bats born their year.   Your team might be drafting Jackson Holliday if they are your club's best players in a rebuild, unless you have great pitching, which...haha, we know Elias' game. MLB Baseball is mostly played by guys 24-32.    286 batters cleared 300 PA in 2024 - about 12% were 33 and up by Fangraphs seasonal age assignments, about 8% were 23 and down. This is just a once a year post, but looking at Bats born from Adley's 1998 to Basallo's 2004, here's how the Orioles achievements compare with MLB's best by rWAR. 1998 - Adley is 4th 1999 - Westburg is 9th, and Kjerstad is 33rd 2000 - Cowser is 16th 2001 - Gunnar is 1st, and Mayo is nearly last, having dug a deep hole in his initial PA.    Trivia - Darell Hernaiz one of the 3 beneath Mayo.    Noelvi Marte dead last also has a PED suspension, d'oh. 2003 - Holliday is 4th - Minnesota the last weekend he got himself out of negative WAR territory. 2004 - Basallo is n/a as Chourio alone has played MLB from that birth year.    Basallo did log the most high minors experience of the 2004 births during the 2024 season. In 2025, Gunnar enters the 24-32 range as Judge departs it.     Cowser's improvement after an off-season a story of comfort for Holliday and Mayo - can they approach his ~3.5 win contribution? Strong, young teams - doing this exercise highlighted Adley's Orioles a little younger than the Braves and all their famous contract extensions.    Acuna, Albies and Riley were all born the year before Adley.   On the AL side of the competition, Yordan and Kyle Tucker also 1997 holding up a strong competitor, though not one that is young anymore.     Judge and Gerrit hoping Soto please stays.    Soto from 1998 - you have to reach back to 1994 for Correa, Bregman and C. Seager to find anyone ahead of him.
    • The Orioles have a lot of flexibility both in terms of prospects, money and potential veterans that hold value. Vets - I could see the Orioles moving on from any of Mountcastle, Mullins, Urias, or O'Hearn. These players may hold the most potential to bullpen upgrades. Money - The Orioles will certainly spend this offseason and that more flexibility than they have had.  I would like to see 1 or 2 extensions, 1 high profile FA, and maybe 1 more solid addition. Prospects - I could see any of the big 4 going somewhere.  I really think the Orioles and Pirates match up really well.  The Pirates have a plethora of young pitchers and the Orioles have young hitters.  I wouldn't be surprised to see the two match up.
    • The hitting philosophy works. That’s why they have been winning the last two years.     Plenty of runs scoring off HR’s in the playoffs. 
    • They would probably want two of Mayo, Basallo, Holliday, and Kjerstad, plus other pieces (likely at least one good pitching prospect, so someone like Povich or McDermott), for both Crochet and Robert.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...