Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, NashLumber said:

And it’s real (not Confederate) money. 

Peter Angelos is trying to get hip with the kids and spending like a rapper. Really frivolously on poor investments like sports cars and drugs until the money stops coming in magically. It's a bold strategy to sell tickets to the youths of America that has backfired. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't stand this guy.  He got his money why try anymore.  There is no challenge to prove anything.  I wish it was like NFL, where as a player don't produce just cut him and no pay.  A player should be obligated to produce according to what he signed up to do.  Trying is not an excuse. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really know the answer to this - haven't done the research.  But let's really take a look here.

  1. Davis is OPSing .480 after nearly 200 plate appearances.  That's a first baseman doing that.
  2. Davis has turned in a -1.5 rWAR to date, and his offensive component is by far the worst on the team.  Only Trey Mancini with his terrible OF defense comes close in overall negative WAR.
  3. There is at least some chance that Davis continues to get regular plate appearances the whole season.  Since we're at the 1/3 mark, that means he is on pace for -4.5 rWAR over nearly 600 PA.

I mean what is going to happen here?  Are we really going to see this happen?  Are we going to see a first baseman OPS .480 in extreme hitting conditions over an entire year?

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been arguing this for two weeks now.  And yes, he is on pace to have the worst MLB season ever.  

Sure, there will probably be utility infielders and catchers who had lower OPS than Davis will have, but nobody expects guys like that to do anything at the plate to begin with.  For a first baseman to be putting up these putrid offensive numbers is obscene, and a quite frankly a desecration of the game.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FanSince88 said:

It might be a nice stealth tanking strategy, but otherwise batting Davis 4th is insane.  I'd rather he bat 9th so younger guys like Sisco, Rickard, and Mancini can get more ABs.  

Batting Davis 4th is insane even if you're trying to end up with the #1 draft pick.  Honestly, it's more like Buck is daring Angelos to fire him.  Who knows, it may be defiance on his part because the FO isn't listening to him.  Or he's blindly going on "tack records" that are no longer good.

 

To answer the OP, it could get to .450.  I can't fathom an ML hitter falling below that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FanSince88 said:

It might be a nice stealth tanking strategy, but otherwise batting Davis 4th is insane.  I'd rather he bat 9th so younger guys like Sisco, Rickard, and Mancini can get more ABs.  

It’s not stealth to anyone with a pulse.  People have been committed for lesser stunts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Only Trey Mancini with his terrible OF defense comes close in overall negative WAR.

And honestly we should be holding Davis responsible for Mancini's negative WAR because Davis is the one forcing Trey out of position in LF.  Just disgraceful. 

And Buck continuing to insist on not only playing Davis but batting him in the heart of the order is an abomination.  It's an absolute travesty and makes a mockery of the game of baseball.  

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Clearly he has a roster spot for a playoff series with the Yankees….
    • My stance would be pretty simple. Im not trading any of the top 3 prospects and im not trading any of the young talent that is controlled long term that is currently on the ML roster. That means besides the very obvious guys that players like Cowser and Kjerstad are also off the board. Now, if a player like Skubal becomes available, that could cause me to change my mind but as I look around at the reported available players, I don’t see anyone worth a top 20 prospect or young contributing ML talent. Guys like Norby and Stowers fall into that latter category but they aren’t here right now and they are just redundant on our roster. So I’m telling teams if you want to deal with us, guys like Norby, Stowers and Beavers are who will lead deals and that several vets, led by Mountcastle, are also on the board in any potential contender/contender(fringe contender) type deal. I think whether it’s Fedde or relievers like Estevez or Nardi or Garcia or even Scott, I think we have enough to get deals done without trading any of the guys we would rather not lose. This is all to say that I just don’t see that proven elite high end talent available this deadline to justify trading any of those top guys.
    • He’s an interesting test case. Prior to 2023, wasn’t good. In 2023, he threw around 200 innings iirc in the KBO and learned the sweeper. Now he is pitching much better. His statcast stats are pretty good although he’s not missing bats or getting Ks and he has a tendency to give up some hard contact.  
    • I don’t think he can be counted on for that. If you can get him cheap fine but his career WAR is 3.5 and he has 3.7 this year. Plus he’s 33 innings short of his career high …did 120-130 range twice. How could that be your acquisition that can be counted on when he could quite possibly run out of gas? Or get to a team where performance matters and feel the pressure versus pitching for the White Sox…A horrid team that everyone knew was going to suck.
    • Yea but how are you defining that?  Is Fedde a #3 or better, for example?
    • With all due respect … I think you are counting on Mayo to come up and immediately perform. I don’t think it’s realistic… possible yes. But, most guys have an adjustment. If it’s one thing we’ve seen from Hyde is the reluctance to give regular time to the rookies. Didn’t see it with Stowers, Norby, etc. They did  give it to Holliday but I think there was pressure being put on him to do so.  You think he would replace Urias who doesn’t play everyday with Mayo and sit the other guys to play him every day which is what a player needs during that adjustment period? 
    • Roch retweeted this. Lots of fans are speculating that it means Watkins is coming back to the Os. It makes some sense as we need fresh arms.  His numbers aren’t great this year but not sure that is going to matter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...