Jump to content

Baltimore Baseball: Astros and Cardinals


weams

Recommended Posts

https://www.baltimorebaseball.com/2019/10/11/orioles-envision-als-cardinals-lcs-predictions-babe-ruth-museum-event/

 

Quote
Conventional wisdom is that Mike Elias would like to pattern the Orioles after the Houston Astros, the team he worked for before coming to Baltimore. He wouldn’t mind mimicking the Astros’ success, but the Orioles’ general manager has said more than once that he also admires the work of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Elias began working in baseball as a scout for the Cardinals in 2007, and it’s St. Louis’ long record of consistency that he admires.

The Cardinals, who begin their National League Championship Series against the Washington Nationals tonight at Busch Stadium, are much more of a realistic model for the Orioles than the Boston Red Sox or New York Yankees.

According to currentresults.com, St. Louis’ metropolitan area was 2.81 million last year, about 100,000 more than the Baltimore area’s 2.71 million.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SteveA said:

St Louis has been better at developing [their own] pitchers than Houston has.

HOU got burned with taking Pitchers Appel and Aiken high. HOU has been grow the bats and buy the arms since then. Using their prospect bats to acquire proven SP. 

I do think bats are safer picks over pitchers. Last draft we took lots of bats compared to pitchers. It could’ve been lots of factors at play, but I think it was a strategic decision. 

Not having the number one pick in next years’ draft means we’ll likely be deciding on the 2nd best SP, Torkelson, or other NCAA and HS bats.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

HOU got burned with taking Pitchers Appel and Aiken high. HOU has been grow the bats and buy the arms since then. Using their prospect bats to acquire proven SP. 

I do think bats are safer picks over pitchers. Last draft we took lots of bats compared to pitchers. It could’ve been lots of factors at play, but I think it was a strategic decision. 

Not having the number one pick in next years’ draft means we’ll likely be deciding on the 2nd best SP, Torkelson, or other NCAA and HS bats.  

Houston has also been able to acquire arms late in the draft or cheaply in the international market and develop them into trade assets. I'm prepping for Rule 5 draft stuff and it's unbelievable how many good arms they have in the minors that came out of nowhere (10+ round pick or older international signees). They all throw hard and miss bats. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/instagraphs/how-they-were-acquired-the-houston-astros-alcs-roster/

Quote

Signed in Free Agency (6)

  • Yuli Gurriel, 1B: July 2016 (Cuba) — Signed to five-year, $47.5 million contract.
  • Josh Reddick, OF: November 2016 (LAD) — Signed to four-year, $52 million contract.
  • Joe Smith, RP: December 2017 (CLE) — Signed to two-year, $15 million contract.
  • Héctor Rondón, RP: December 2017 (CHC) — Signed to two-year, $8.5 million contract.
  • Robinson Chirinos, ? December 2018 (TEX) — Signed to one-year, $5.75 million contract.
  • Michael Brantley, OF: December 2018 (CLE) — Signed two-year, $32 million contract.

Total WAR: 10.9

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/how-they-were-acquired-the-st-louis-cardinals-nlds-roster/

Quote

Signed in Free Agency (4)

  • Dexter Fowler, OF: December 2016 (CHC) — Signed to five-year, $82.5 million contract.
  • Miles Mikolas, SP: December 2017 (Japan) — Signed to two-year, $15.5 million contract; signed four-year contract extension (2020-23) in February.
  • Andrew Miller, RP: December 2018 (CLE) — Signed to two-year, $25 million contract ($12 million club option for 2021).
  • Matt Wieters, ? February 2019 (WSN) — Signed to Minor League contract ($1.5 million salary).

Total WAR: 3.3

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

The Cardinals trace their origins to the old St. Louis Browns of the AA.  They were great in the 1880s, bad from about 1890-1910, but haven't had more losing seasons than winning in a decade since then.

Of the eight teams that survived the NL consolidation in 1900, the Cardinals were the last to win a pennant (in 1926). In their 34 years in the NL before '26, their highest finishes were third place, four times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

Of the eight teams that survived the NL consolidation in 1900, the Cardinals were the last to win a pennant (in 1926). In their 34 years in the NL before '26, their highest finishes were third place, four times.

Which is a little odd because they were the beneficiaries of the syndicate agreement with Cleveland.  The reason the 1899 Spiders happened was that their owners teamed up with St. Louis' and transferred all the actual major leaguers to Missouri.  I would have thought they'd have gotten a significant boost from that,  but the bump only lasted a single year.

From 130 years away it looks like the Browns/Cards took a very long time to recover from the transition from the AA to the NL.  They went from maybe the best AA team to a .350 team in the NL.  They didn't consistently contend in the NL for almost 30 years.  In 1890 St. Louis was considered far out west.  Teams would go on long train trips to Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago, St. Louis.  I thought maybe the city just wasn't large enough to compete with the eastern teams and Chicago, but their population was as big as Baltimore in 1890, and was rapidly expanding. I guess it could have just been that they were run poorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Which is a little odd because they were the beneficiaries of the syndicate agreement with Cleveland.  The reason the 1899 Spiders happened was that their owners teamed up with St. Louis' and transferred all the actual major leaguers to Missouri.  I would have thought they'd have gotten a significant boost from that,  but the bump only lasted a single year.

From 130 years away it looks like the Browns/Cards took a very long time to recover from the transition from the AA to the NL.  They went from maybe the best AA team to a .350 team in the NL.  They didn't consistently contend in the NL for almost 30 years.  In 1890 St. Louis was considered far out west.  Teams would go on long train trips to Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago, St. Louis.  I thought maybe the city just wasn't large enough to compete with the eastern teams and Chicago, but their population was as big as Baltimore in 1890, and was rapidly expanding. I guess it could have just been that they were run poorly.

This according to wiki, is the 1890 standings.

Just seams to be a bit off, if you know what I mean.

American Association W L Pct. GB Home Road
Louisville Colonels 88 44 0.667 57–13 31–31
Columbus Solons 79 55 0.590 10 47–22 32–33
St. Louis Browns 78 58 0.574 12 45–25 33–33
Toledo Maumees 68 64 0.515 20 40–27 28–37
Rochester Broncos 63 63 0.500 22 40–22 23–41
Baltimore Orioles 15 19 0.441 24 8–11 7–8
Syracuse Stars 55 72 0.433 30½ 30–30 25–42
Philadelphia Athletics 54 78 0.409 34 36–36 18–42
Brooklyn Gladiators 26 73 0.263 45½ 15–22 11–51
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

This according to wiki, is the 1890 standings.

Just seams to be a bit off, if you know what I mean.

American Association W L Pct. GB Home Road
Louisville Colonels 88 44 0.667 57–13 31–31
Columbus Solons 79 55 0.590 10 47–22 32–33
St. Louis Browns 78 58 0.574 12 45–25 33–33
Toledo Maumees 68 64 0.515 20 40–27 28–37
Rochester Broncos 63 63 0.500 22 40–22 23–41
Baltimore Orioles 15 19 0.441 24 8–11 7–8
Syracuse Stars 55 72 0.433 30½ 30–30 25–42
Philadelphia Athletics 54 78 0.409 34 36–36 18–42
Brooklyn Gladiators 26 73 0.263 45½ 15–22 11–51

Here's the explanation, from another Wikipedia entry:

The Baltimore Orioles team left the American Association after the 1889 season and started playing in the minor Atlantic Association. However, when the Brooklyn Gladiators ballclub folded mid-way through the 1890 season the Orioles returned to the AA to finish out the season.

When you add the Baltimore and Brooklyn teams' records, they make up a full AA season.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
    • This.  I grew up in Northern VA and it always took 1 hour to drive to Memorial or Camden no matter the time of day.  It was always easy to find parking as well.  Now that same drive takes 2-3 hours, and finding good parking is a pain.  Plus, the cost of parking, tickets, food/drinks, souvenirs has skyrocketed.  So the choice is to sit in traffic, fight for parking, pay tons of money for the hassle...or sit on my comfortable couch and watch the game on a huge HD screen for free...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...