Jump to content

2019 #15 Prospect: Brenan Hanifee – RHP


weams

Recommended Posts

Definitely a down year for Hanifee and it will be interesting to see how he bounces back.    One thing I really like about him is he’s an innings eater.   Despite his struggles he only failed to go five innings 4 times in 24 starts, and he went 6+ in 11 starts, including a 9 inning complete game shutout.   
 

Seems to me a lot of our pitchers struggle in the transition from low A to high A, so in that context I’m also willing to give Hanifee a bit of a mulligan, but he’s going to have to come back strong this year to stay on the radar.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Definitely a down year for Hanifee and it will be interesting to see how he bounces back.    One thing I really like about him is he’s an innings eater.   Despite his struggles he only failed to go five innings 4 times in 24 starts, and he went 6+ in 11 starts, including a 9 inning complete game shutout.   
 

Seems to me a lot of our pitchers struggle in the transition from low A to high A, so in that context I’m also willing to give Hanifee a bit of a mulligan, but he’s going to have to come back strong this year to stay on the radar.   

He might be an opener. The frame might play up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Is it a given that Hanifee will start the year at Bowie, or is it possible he spends some more time at Frederick?

I don't know. But I am sure gonna spend a good bit of time at the minor league camp this spring. Yessiree. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be curious to see how long Elias & Co. wait before switching to pitchers to bullpen roles. Under prior regimes, we'd have to see a player fail for multiple seasons before finally moving them into a bullpen role. I'd rather see a player moved into a position to succeed sooner rather than wait until they are a reclamation project and need to rebuild confidence in a new role. 

Not saying that is what needs to happen with Hanifee, but he seems like a candidate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WalkWithElias said:

I'll be curious to see how long Elias & Co. wait before switching to pitchers to bullpen roles. Under prior regimes, we'd have to see a player fail for multiple seasons before finally moving them into a bullpen role. I'd rather see a player moved into a position to succeed sooner rather than wait until they are a reclamation project and need to rebuild confidence in a new role. 

Not saying that is what needs to happen with Hanifee, but he seems like a candidate. 

I don't believe relief role practice in the minors is all that important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I'm only box score scouting these guys, and reading scouting reports, but I'd think that Sedlock and Zimmerman profile better than Hanifee.  Zimmerman seems like he's underrated because he gets lost in the shuffle of the group of Lefties that we have with sorta/kinda similar profiles.  

+1, I voted for Sedlock/Fenter for this reason. I'd rather bet on the guy who had a bad year and then rebounded than the guy who just had a bad year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really going on probability (which may be low), but I still see upside from Hanifee that might not be there for a lot of our other guys. His prospect status could be a yo-yo that goes up or down depending on whether he gets a feel for a 3rd pitch and whether they move him to the pen. I think having him here is defensible in that regard, as is dropping him as many seem to have done. I just personally hate to move a guy down too much when we know he still has physical upside either after an injury or a not very impressive year, particularly when the player development people completely changed, so likely did his preparation.

If he jumps way up next year, I wouldn't be shocked. If he drops, same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Not really going on probability (which may be low), but I still see upside from Hanifee that might not be there for a lot of our other guys. His prospect status could be a yo-yo that goes up or down depending on whether he gets a feel for a 3rd pitch and whether they move him to the pen. I think having him here is defensible in that regard, as is dropping him as many seem to have done. I just personally hate to move a guy down too much when we know he still has physical upside either after an injury or a not very impressive year, particularly when the player development people completely changed, so likely did his preparation.

If he jumps way up next year, I wouldn't be shocked. If he drops, same. 

I hope he makes a big jump this year like all of us do and I don't disagree with anything you posted but this is what limits my expectations for him:

"He’s filled out and is no longer traditionally projectable. His athleticism and strikethrowing ability also took a step back. His velocity is still 90-94 like it was when he was 19 years old"

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, weams said:

I don't know. But I am sure gonna spend a good bit of time at the minor league camp this spring. Yessiree. 

I will be looking for some detailed reports on what you see there.   At least as thorough as your description of the buffet at the Elias radio interview!    That was at Tony/Luke level of detail.    On the 80 point scale, how did you grade the shrimp sliders?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I will be looking for some detailed reports on what you see there.   At least as thorough as your description of the buffet at the Elias radio interview!    That was at Tony/Luke level of detail.    On the 80 point scale, how did you grade the shrimp sliders?

I'll do my best. I thought the Kiwi looked like a monster and I believed in Tyler Wilson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • ZiPS being an inhuman thing incapable of recency bias is not much out on Holliday.    It only dings his 2025-2029 forecast WAR by about 3% today relative to what it was forecasting this spring. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/reassessing-the-future-for-this-seasons-disappointing-rookies/ Jackson Holliday’s numbers didn’t take a big hit for a few reasons. First, and most importantly, despite a really lousy debut in the majors, he played well enough in the minors — plus he’s so young and his résumé is so strong — that his small-sample struggles barely register. By reverse-o-fying Holliday’s major league woes into an untranslated minor league line and including it in his overall Triple-A production, ZiPS estimates that he would’ve had a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A this season, down from his actual mark of 142. A 20-year-old shortstop with a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A would still top everybody’s prospect list.
    • Kjerstad should also get some reps in at first so he can be an option there as well, although now is probably not the time, best for him to DH for the rest of the season. He had 8 starts at first at AAA this season and 37 starts there between AA and AAA in 2023.
    • In Grich’s case, I think his OBP skills weren’t appreciated at the time.  He was a .266 lifetime hitter in an era when that was maybe 10 points above average, but his .371 OBP was more like 45-50 points above average.  But OBP just wasn’t very valued at the time.  
    • We don’t have a current combo that is ideal. You have to go with the best possible grouping you have.
    • Yep, we're in agreement on the 70 rWAR threshold.  A championship would help Manny's cause, though I'm not sure if that's in the cards for him in the near future.  He needs a big moment on a big stage, too....as silly as that sounds, I do believe it matters in the eyes of some voters. Not to derail, but Whitaker is a guy that belongs in the HoF, too.  I'm not sure why Grich never got serious consideration.
    • I’ve always felt that 70 rWAR was the line between having to justify why someone shouldn’t be in the HOF versus justifying why they should.  In other words, if you’re over 70, there needs to be a reason for you NOT to be in.  There are 70 position players over 70 WAR, and the only ones not in are Bonds, Pujols (not yet eligible), Trout (not yet eligible), Rose, Bill Dahlen, Lou Whitaker, Raffy Palmeiro, Bobby Grich, and Carlos Beltran.  Really, only Dahlen, Whitaker and Grich have no obvious reason why they’re not in.  And I wouldn’t bet against Beltran getting in eventually.  He’s gotten  46% and 57% of the ballots his first two tries.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...