Jump to content

Orioles All-Time "Last Gasp" Team, Part 1 (C/IF)


TronBlaster

Recommended Posts

I suppose you could fit him in both the IF and OF category, but Jeff Conine part II definitely fits the bill.  I loved Conine during his first go round with the team, he was a bright spot during some absolutely awful years.  But, 2006 he was 40 and was the textbook definition of "veteran presence" that the Orioles loved to emphasize back in those days.  While his overall slash line could have been much worse for a 40 year old, you could have probably gotten it with much younger and cheaper alternatives.

Someone who you can unquestionably fit into the IF category was Miguel Tejada part II.  There really wasn't anything that could be salvaged from his second go around.  I guess the fact that they got anyone back in a trade for him, that counts for something.  But veteran presence on a terrible team, blech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ShaneDawg85 said:

I suppose you could fit him in both the IF and OF category, but Jeff Conine part II definitely fits the bill.  I loved Conine during his first go round with the team, he was a bright spot during some absolutely awful years.  But, 2006 he was 40 and was the textbook definition of "veteran presence" that the Orioles loved to emphasize back in those days.  While his overall slash line could have been much worse for a 40 year old, you could have probably gotten it with much younger and cheaper alternatives.

And he somehow managed to play for THREE more teams (Phillies, Reds, Mets) AFTER his second stint with the Os ?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 24fps said:

Looking for info on the Orioles/Angels competition for Vlad is what led me to the OH in the first place.  A lot of water under the bridge now.  I understand the bitterness, but by that point the O's were already six years into the fourteen-year losing streak and the two-headed monster was in the front office.  I remember reports of Vlad being desperate for an alternative and holding out until the Angels finally came to his rescue.  As an Orioles fan it sucked, but I can't say I blame him for his decision.

I don't blame him at all.  In retrospect the only question I have is why anyone would sign with the Orioles of that era.  I think if I were a Kevin Millar type I would have gone to Japan instead.  Either that or just accept that I was getting my $3M so it was fine that I was going to lose roughly 100 games with no real hope for the future of the org.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ShaneDawg85 said:

I suppose you could fit him in both the IF and OF category, but Jeff Conine part II definitely fits the bill.  I loved Conine during his first go round with the team, he was a bright spot during some absolutely awful years.  But, 2006 he was 40 and was the textbook definition of "veteran presence" that the Orioles loved to emphasize back in those days.  While his overall slash line could have been much worse for a 40 year old, you could have probably gotten it with much younger and cheaper alternatives.

Someone who you can unquestionably fit into the IF category was Miguel Tejada part II.  There really wasn't anything that could be salvaged from his second go around.  I guess the fact that they got anyone back in a trade for him, that counts for something.  But veteran presence on a terrible team, blech.

Conine II, Tejada II, Surhoff II.  Palmer's 45-year-old fiasco comeback in spring training.  Ross Grimsley in '82.  Don't get back together with your ex, it rarely works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Nokes and Andy Van Slyke for me always stood out as a last gasp duo in the 95' season.  Nokes was done after 26 games but Van Slyke went on to have 247 PA's with the Phils, putting up 0.4 WAR. So I guess it wasnt technically his last gasp, but the O's cut him, so he must have been pretty bad. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

The Palmeiro incident was definitely a down point of that whole era. I honestly never wanted to sign him back, but with his 3000 hits countdown and cheap price tag,  I can see why the O's wanted him.

I remember the finger pointing thing.  I may be wrong, but, wasn't he caught after the testimony?  He may have thought that he wouldn't get tested after all that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Conine II, Tejada II, Surhoff II.  Palmer's 45-year-old fiasco comeback in spring training.  Ross Grimsley in '82.  Don't get back together with your ex, it rarely works out.

But it's a chance to really f--- them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MongoBoy said:

I remember the finger pointing thing.  I may be wrong, but, wasn't he caught after the testimony?  He may have thought that he wouldn't get tested after all that.

He was caught afterwards but I dont know the timeline. It looks like he's scolding someone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Everything revolves around the health of the player. I think Gunnar has more. I think the collision with Mateo set Gunnar back and affected him in ways we will never know. I'm no mind specialist but Gunnar is young plays all out, and that had to bother him. I've watched that collision a number of times. No fault - just two players going all out and one is finished for the year. It just so happened that Gunnar got the yips and his batting went south soon thereafter. Maybe a coincidence but I think we will see a rejuvenated Gunnar next year and all stops are off. 
    • I’m not so sure the bolded part is true. I think a lot of that last bit can have to do with small skills: situational hitting/running, above average play in close games, generally things that can be boiled down to “luck.” I didn’t see this years team as having a major talent discrepancy from the 2023 version.
    • As great as Gunnar is can’t assume he matches last year. That said I like the odds of the team as a whole matching what we did. 
    • The real improvement of this team will come from within.    The 3-5 players they bring in from outside the org will supplement the roster…maybe put it over the top but the real improvement will come from those already in the org.
    • Yeah. -Would love to keep Burnes but I seriously doubt it. -I have a lot of faith in Adley.  - Holliday has huge ceiling even if he isn’t ready to be elite.  - doesn’t always work this way but the better your closer is tends to help rest of pen 
    • Nice OP. Thanks for the effort. Like the chart. Surprised it hasn't received much response. You sum up a lot of what I hope for as well. I'd add: I think a full - healty year of Westy will be even more valuable. I think Gunnar has even more in the tank. I want - hope that Holliday can develop into the lead off hitter and OBP table setter we need. And, I so want Cowser to cut down on strike outs and continue to develop as a professional hitter. I think he has the potential to cover for the loss of Santander while Big K develops on the right side. A lot to hope for but I believe these youngsters have a lot of potential yet to tap. And oh yes - I want Mayo to make Roy and all of us proud! Thanks again for the effort! I look at pitching as if we have a base. I agree with your points 1 and 2.
    • Postgame Pedro Martinez and Dusty Baker critiquing Clase tripling up on his weaker pitch before the Carpenter heroics. 78% cutters on the season for Clase - the key PA went cutter-cutter-cutter-slider-slider-slider.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...