Jump to content

FiveThirtyEight: Catcher Is Baseball’s Most Endangered Position (Write-Up about Rutschman with Quotes from Sig)


TINSTAAPP

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If that was true it would show up in free agent contacts.

I think the magnitude was so big that nobody really could quite believe it, even the players themselves.  And they all think it's going to go away.  We did see things like random Molinas signing MLB contracts and playing quite a bit when they were hitting .193 with no power and the speed of Matt Wieters wearing cinder blocks, presumably because framing.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2020 at 7:52 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

That's why you do the math, so you can figure out the relative importance of each of those.  It at least appears that in edge cases framing is hugely important, much more so than most of the rest of your list, which I find ridiculous and in desperate need of fixing.

Folks like Tom Tango, who I very much trust, stick by the current framing metrics.  Which means at the extremes like Molina and Doumit framing has more of an impact per inning or game than a top hitter.  It's comical, baseball should be embarrassed by it, but it's apparently true.

Wow, I didn't know it was that bad. And I wonder how umpire ratings (if there are such measures) compare, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2020 at 12:30 PM, DrungoHazewood said:

I think the magnitude was so big that nobody really could quite believe it, even the players themselves.  And they all think it's going to go away.  We did see things like random Molinas signing MLB contracts and playing quite a bit when they were hitting .193 with no power and the speed of Matt Wieters wearing cinder blocks, presumably because framing.

Not really so if one is talking about Yadier Molina, who's even had a few seasons where he stole a decent amount of bases (9 twice, 12 once, and 6 for 6 last season at the age of 36).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LA2 said:

Not really so if one is talking about Yadier Molina, who's even had a few seasons where he stole a decent amount of bases (9 twice, 12 once, and 6 for 6 last season at the age of 36).

I was referring to Jose more than anyone else.  In '14 he had a .417 OPS yet was still the Rays' primary catcher presumably because he could trick the ump into calling a ball a strike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I was referring to Jose more than anyone else.  In '14 he had a .417 OPS yet was still the Rays' primary catcher presumably because he could trick the ump into calling a ball a strike.

He started 70 games.

I still say if the impact is that large not only would they be paid for it, but it would be commonplace to bring in your framing catcher for save situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, now said:

Wow, I didn't know it was that bad. And I wonder how umpire ratings (if there are such measures) compare, too.

By Fangraphs' reckoning, in 2014 Jose Molina was +17 runs in framing in 628 innings.  In 2008 Ryan Doumit was -63 runs in 909 innings.

That means that, per 1350 innings (9 x 150 games) the delta between those performances is +36 - (-94) = 130 runs or 13 wins.  In Barry Bonds' best, most steroid-influenced season he was 12.7 wins above replacement for his batting + fielding + baserunning.  So I guess if you compare him to Chris Davis' worst than the extremes of framing aren't quite as wide as everything else put together.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He started 70 games.

I still say if the impact is that large not only would they be paid for it, but it would be commonplace to bring in your framing catcher for save situations.

Like I said before, I'm not sure anyone fully believed it was that big.  They believe it's a thing, but just not that huge.

And truthfully, we're not usually comparing Molina to the worst ever.  We're comparing him to his backups.  And his primary backup that year was Ryan Hanigan who was +6 in 603 innings.  So that's a small fraction of a run a game, and even less in a few innings of a save situation.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Adley is having a down year. I believe he will bounce back.
    • I admire those of you who have such confidence in this offense. It’s been absolutely terrible for months, other than the last week of the season. It was beyond terrible yesterday- yes Ragans was good but the approach was awful by every hitter. I’ll be thrilled for them to prove me overly pessimistic, but I have zero faith in these bats.  This is at least partially a defense mechanism. I am not ready for the baseball season to be over, and another terribly quick exit from the postseason would just be so dreadful. I don’t need them to win the WS. But winning one GD game would be nice. Not looking forward to six months without baseball. 
    • You don’t have to twist yourself into a pretzel to defend Hyde. If Santander’s defense costs us, it means we got to extra innings and pinch running for OHearn was the right call. Also, are you really trying to say that OHearn is so valuable a defender at 1B that we couldn’t stand to lose that glove in extras? I doubt he’s even better than Santander. 
    • Here's what people thought a couple weeks ago.   
    • Wieters' bWAR was 13.3 through his first 4 seasons (2009 - 2012).  It ended at 18.3 after his last season in 2020, so he was basically ineffective for the last 8 years of his career. Adley's bWAR is 13.1 through his first 3 seasons. So it isn't like Wieters didn't have a strong start to his career just like Adley did.  I think the concern that folks have is that the rest of Adley's career will play out like the rest of Wieters' career.  It seemed very unlikely halfway through this year, but this has been one hell of a drop-off.   And after Wieters never lived up to expectations, it is definitely a fear that we may be reliving this again.  Let's hope this second half was just an aberration.   
    • Adley has been in a horrible almost 4 month slump. Before that, he was the WAY BETTER offensive player. But I pose this question: What does it matter if Rutschman turns out to be worse than Wieters? Matt Wieters was drafted almost TWENTY YEARS AGO. No one in this org had anything to do with him being on our roster. HEck none of our current front office was even here for his entire Orioles' career.
    • I do feel like Adley is out of shape or at least has gotten more out of shape than usual. That’s part of the reason I think he’s hurt…not working out as much. If he is healthy and the slump is this bad, I’m ok questioning whether or not the new GF(ie the distraction) is part of it. Is he putting everything into the game that he should?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...