Jump to content

Orioles' last 5 tool player?


Redskins Rick

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

There have been 24 players with 31 to 41 rWAR through age 26.  17 of them (71%) are in the Hall.

The ones not in the Hall are:
Vada Pinson (I think he had back problems, declined badly in late 20s/early 30s)
Cesar Cedeno (Fell apart in late 20s)
Sherry Magee (Could be in the Hall, but isn't)
John McGraw (Was done by 30, probably because of 19th century diseases like typhoid)
Jim Fregosi (Injured?  Didn't play a full season after 29)
Joe Jackson (banned for throwing World Series)
Dick Allen (personality and other problems that kind of put Manny to shame)

I thought Vada had fallen victim to Heorin or Coke habit? (Maybe because of the back)

I dont think Manny has had too many on the field problems, but not sure, how many more his career can take, without impacting the writers opinion of him and HOF worthlessness.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

I thought 2013, he set a record for double in the MLB, my bad. Guess he just led the AL in doubles that season with 51.

Yea, Earl Webb is still safe.

That record hasn't been seriously approached very often.  Every once in a while someone will put up over 30 in half a season, but invariably they fall way off the pace.  Nobody has hit 60 doubles in a season since the 30s.  Helton came close in 2000.  And (bizarrely, I didn't know about this) Nicholas Castellanos had 58 laste year, the only person in the top 75 who switched teams in mid-season.

The highest doubles rates for years are 1930, 2007, 2006, 2008, 1932, and 2004.  They've been off a bit the last 10 years but are still in the top ~25 seasons of all time.  But still, nobody's seriously challenged Webb, who was a minor league star in the independent high minors of the 1920s and didn't have a full MLB season until he was almost 30.

The professional record is 100, by Lyman Lamb of Tulsa in the Western League in 1924.  I believe that's the record by 25 doubles, no one else in any league ever hit more than 75 doubles in a season.  The preceding two years Lamb hit 68 and 71.  In 54 MLB games he doubled 11 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

I thought Vada had fallen victim to Heorin or Coke habit? (Maybe because of the back)

I dont think Manny has had too many on the field problems, but not sure, how many more his career can take, without impacting the writers opinion of him and HOF worthlessness.

 

 

Manny's numbers comp to Adrian Beltre's to this point in their careers.  I don't think anyone pegged Beltre to be a HoF player through his age 26 season.  He hadn't made an All Star game but was a runner up for MVP one season.  

(and to pat myself on the back, Adrian Beltre is Manny's #1 comp, I did this research before I looked).

So Manny has some work to do...he'll have to play awhile, get some more GGs, become known as a generational defender and put up some big round counting numbers.  And become beloved.  Adrian Beltre became a beloved player in his later years.  Manny, most people think of him as a villain of sorts.  If he does all that, he can be a HoFer.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Manny's numbers comp to Adrian Beltre's to this point in their careers.  I don't think anyone pegged Beltre to be a HoF player through his age 26 season.  He hadn't made an All Star game but was a runner up for MVP one season.  

(and to pat myself on the back, Adrian Beltre is Manny's #1 comp, I did this research before I looked).

So Manny has some work to do...he'll have to play awhile, get some more GGs, become known as a generational defender and put up some big round counting numbers.  And become beloved.  Adrian Beltre became a beloved player in his later years.  Manny, most people think of him as a villain of sorts.  If he does all that, he can be a HoFer.

Beltre (and I like him) is not the glove Manny is.

Manny is gone to other teams, and was still making the ESPN highlights for his glove, but not as much.

I think his best position is 3rd, and at that position could be argued as the best defender at 3rd. You cant make that argument about Manny at SS. Not that he is Jeter there.

Beltrie is sure to be in the HOF, with his career WAR.

Manny has a solid start on the path to HOF, and if he had run off a few more 7.3s like he was when he was in Baltimore. He would be a shoe in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Beltre (and I like him) is not the glove Manny is.

Manny is gone to other teams, and was still making the ESPN highlights for his glove, but not as much.

I think his best position is 3rd, and at that position could be argued as the best defender at 3rd. You cant make that argument about Manny at SS. Not that he is Jeter there.

Beltrie is sure to be in the HOF, with his career WAR.

Manny has a solid start on the path to HOF, and if he had run off a few more 7.3s like he was when he was in Baltimore. He would be a shoe in.

 

Well, remains to be seen.  I hope Manny sticks at 3rd, I think he will with the emergence of Tatis Jr.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Manny's numbers comp to Adrian Beltre's to this point in their careers.  I don't think anyone pegged Beltre to be a HoF player through his age 26 season.  He hadn't made an All Star game but was a runner up for MVP one season.  

(and to pat myself on the back, Adrian Beltre is Manny's #1 comp, I did this research before I looked).

So Manny has some work to do...he'll have to play awhile, get some more GGs, become known as a generational defender and put up some big round counting numbers.  And become beloved.  Adrian Beltre became a beloved player in his later years.  Manny, most people think of him as a villain of sorts.  If he does all that, he can be a HoFer.

The biggest difference between Manny and Beltre at 26 is that Manny has been pretty consistent, while Beltre was a below-average hitter in five of his first eight seasons.  But then he had that... interesting... walk year where his OPS went up .300 points in 2004.  Through 26 Manny had four 5-win seasons, Beltre one.

Beltre also had a unusual age 31-37 peak, so I'm not sure if the comp really means much.  Adrian Beltre's career looks like one of those players who debuted in 1913 or 1983, and was in mid-career when the balls/players/whatever went nuts.   But, strangely, offenses were going down as he both aged and got better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

Beltrie is sure to be in the HOF, with his career WAR.

I'm going to pick a little nit here.  Beltre will go to the Hall because he was one of the best third basemen in baseball for 20 years, he won gold gloves, he got MVP votes, he played on five postseason teams, he led the league in hits, doubles and homers. He's one of the five, certainly 10 best third basemen of all time.  And most of that is reflected in very good seasonal and career WAR totals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I'm going to pick a little nit here.  Beltre will go to the Hall because he was one of the best third basemen in baseball for 20 years, he won gold gloves, he got MVP votes, he played on five postseason teams, he led the league in hits, doubles and homers. He's one of the five, certainly 10 best third basemen of all time.  And most of that is reflected in very good seasonal and career WAR totals. 

Your correct on all counts. Not nit picking on your part, I just didnt elaborate my statement and it look like i was just saying career WAR would get him in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/1/2020 at 6:09 AM, Redskins Rick said:

You dont set American League records for doubles, if you dont hustle and run.

 

Tell that to the Dodgers.

After he did not run hard after he hit a ball he thought was a home run, he admitted he would never be "Charley Hustle". And if you are hitting balls off of the outfield walls, you don't really have to hustle much to get to second base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, panick said:

 

Tell that to the Dodgers.

After he did not run hard after he hit a ball he thought was a home run, he admitted he would never be "Charley Hustle". And if you are hitting balls off of the outfield walls, you don't really have to hustle much to get to second base.

Tell that to Ernie Lombardi's ghost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I'm going to pick a little nit here.  Beltre will go to the Hall because he was one of the best third basemen in baseball for 20 years, he won gold gloves, he got MVP votes, he played on five postseason teams, he led the league in hits, doubles and homers. He's one of the five, certainly 10 best third basemen of all time.  And most of that is reflected in very good seasonal and career WAR totals. 

Our old friend Carl Ripken would say you're underrating him. Sorry, Brooksie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

But that was in the 1930s, when not hustling was a funny story that someone would tell at an Moose Lodge roast.  Not like today when it's serious as a heart attack.

But, Corn is the only one here old enough to know that first hand. :) :) :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'll be honest, the playoffs didn't put me in a happy mood and reading this board has only made it worse.  The amount of people, many well respected, with over the top, outrageous takes calling guys "losers" and "chokers" etc. is ridiculous imo.  This reads more like a football board than a baseball board, and that's not a compliment. I'm kind of at a loss for what they should do to be honest.  The 2nd half drop-off imo is mostly explained by the injuries, particularly on the mound, and Adley's inexplicable performance.  If they were to run the team back with some minimal upgrades to the rotation and pen, sans Burnes and Santander, I think that's a team that could/should win 95ish games and compete for the division.  But there's downside there too.  And if you get Adley of the 2nd half, then you might be looking more at 85ish wins and missing the playoffs. However, I see a lot of schizophrenic and illogical takes on the board.  A lot of people are calling for a "veteran hitter" for the lineup; many of those same people are all too happy to let Santander walk.  Some are calling to not just "hand jobs to young guys;" many of these people were the loudest in demanding more aggressive promoting of prospects. I'm just generally down on the tenor of the board, and personally, I don't have any crazy strong feelings about what I think the O's should or should not do, which is fairly unusual for me.
    • The Phillies are profitable.  The Mets and the Padres are the only two teams that have really done aggressive “deficit-spending” in pursuit of a ring in the last few years.
    • If someone pays Burnes 400 mil or anything close. I think there are owners out there that haven't learned anything and have more money that brains. Don't get me wrong - Burnes is a good pitcher but that's it he is a good pitcher that will turn 30 next year. I believe the calculus for paying 30ish starting pitchers of value is changing. I believe - regardless of Boras - shorter terms and higher average annuals will be in play. So to me, 4/120 isn't a stupid prediction. Guess we shall see. 
    • There is NOTHING preventing the Orioles of signing any player to a serious contract. Especially considering we have signed ZERO since Chris Davis way back in what 2015? That was almost a decade ago. We have been operating in a non-serious manner for too long when it comes to the org’s on field investment.  Teams that don’t spend don’t win World Series. Look at the last 20 years of the game. The Astros first World Series is the only team who wasn’t too half of the league who won a championship.
    • Some owners spend and want to win (Mets, Padres, Phillies). Some are more interested in making money (Rays, Guardians, etc). If Rubenstein is a profits based owner (has to make money year after year like JA) vs an investment style o lever (accepts some years May come with a loss or small net gain) then we (the fans) will be screwed. We will be akin to the Rays who are content with being “good”. But they are never willing to do what it takes to be good enough. I hope Rubenstein and everyone associated with the business or the Orioles paid a lot of attention to all of the empty seats for playoff games. That is evidence of a fanbase/market place who is not fully engaged.  The onus is on the Orioles to give people a compelling reason to come out and spend money especially in this economy. And it cannot just be hey look we have a winning team. The franchise must do more including investing in the on field product (in terms of committed dollars like every other serious franchise who is trying to win a championship).
    • My recollection is that MLB has rules about how much debt teams are allowed to take on and how much money owners are allowed to infuse into their franchises.   They supposedly won't approve contracts if they think a contract will cause them to exceed these thresholds.
    • Yeah like Tony T but Tony has the ability to foul pitches at will.  I want Cowser to be more like @waroriole’s Rob Refsnyder and Holliday to be Steven Kwan.  Is that too much to ask of number one picks?  But I love Cowser and most of everything he brings. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...