Jump to content

The 40 man roster will be a bottleneck this season


wildcard

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Honestly we don't know if winning will ever be a priority for ownership.

So you dont care to win why pretend and do the following?

You decide to hire Elias and pretty much give him carte blache on front office decisions, and he pretty much cleans house, even "no-touch" Brady is gone.

This looks like a total rebuild from ground up, minor league system, front office, scouting department, and adding coaches to scout in the DR and a facility there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

So you dont care to win why pretend and do the following?

You decide to hire Elias and pretty much give him carte blache on front office decisions, and he pretty much cleans house, even "no-touch" Brady is gone.

This looks like a total rebuild from ground up, minor league system, front office, scouting department, and adding coaches to scout in the DR and a facility there.

They had to hire someone.

They didn't give him Carte Blache, it's pretty obvious he's under spending restraints and Davis is a thing.

They didn't have a GM.  You need a GM if you want to win or if you want to suck every dollar you can out of the franchise.

Once they start actively spending money on the ML team we will know.  Before that happens it's speculation that it will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Most of these guys are the cheap.  But they are trying to find the best cheapest players they can acquire.

Who they will release a week later and find another cheapest best player available. Repeat 30 times and you have the Orioles season.  They aren't trying to win games this year.  The 40 man roster crunch doesn't exist for the Orioles this year. . They plan to have two minor league independent teams playing in Nashville this season.  Expect the Orioles to be watching those games very closely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

They had to hire someone.

They didn't give him Carte Blache, it's pretty obvious he's under spending restraints and Davis is a thing.

They didn't have a GM.  You need a GM if you want to win or if you want to suck every dollar you can out of the franchise.

Once they start actively spending money on the ML team we will know.  Before that happens it's speculation that it will.

Carte Blache over front office personal decisions.

I wont beat up Elias for not be able to get the authority to dump Davis, just because you feel he should be gone.

I doubt there would be any other owner in MLB, willing to dump that amount of money. I understand the situation, he isnt doing anything to earn the money anyway, its a lost cause, just dump it and be done, but getting owner by in, is never easy.

I think Frobby said it best back in ST, we need to get through this season, and then see what Elias does for ST 2021 about entering the FA market.

If it wasnt Frobby, my apologies.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yes.  Not sure why you are asking.

We don't know what the actual priorities are for ownership. 

The main goal might be to make as much money as possible off the team.

We know that Peter was willing to spend in certain situations.  We don't know that about the sons.  Not yet.

Well, this shows something:

Orioles Officially Hire Mike Elias as Highest-Paid First-Year General Manager in MLB History

https://www.12up.com/posts/6224605-orioles-officially-hire-mike-elias-as-highest-paid-first-year-general-manager-in-mlb-history

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Redskins Rick said:

Carte Blache over front office personal decisions.

I wont beat up Elias for not be able to get the authority to dump Davis, just because you feel he should be gone.

I doubt there would be any other owner in MLB, willing to dump that amount of money. I understand the situation, he isnt doing anything to earn the money anyway, its a lost cause, just dump it and be done, but getting owner by in, is never easy.

I think Frobby said it best back in ST, we need to get through this season, and then see what Elias does for ST 2021 about entering the FA market.

If it wasnt Frobby, my apologies.

 

Giving him control of front office hires is irrelevant to the point I am making.

If you have evidence that Sig is pulling in 5M a year I'll change my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

Well, this shows something:

Orioles Officially Hire Mike Elias as Highest-Paid First-Year General Manager in MLB History

https://www.12up.com/posts/6224605-orioles-officially-hire-mike-elias-as-highest-paid-first-year-general-manager-in-mlb-history

That you know how to bold things?

So someone who was hired as an executive vice president makes more than prior first year general mangers?  Shocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That you know how to bold things?

So someone who was hired as an executive vice president makes more than prior first year general mangers?  Shocking.

Just cut and paste.  I didn't bold it.

It shows the Son's spent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be honest here, the only players on the 40-man roster that should concern Elias are ones that either will be part of a winning future in 2-3 years, or can bring in players by trade for players who may.

Out of that list, the following players should be protected: (And I'm stretching it for some)

Pitchers:
Keegan Akin (maybe)
Miguel Castro
Alex Cobb (Trade potential)
Mychal Givens (trade)
Hunter Harvey
Dean Kremer (maybe)
John Means
Tanner Scott (stretch)

Catchers:
None

Infielders:
Ryan Mountcastle
Renato Nunez (stretch)

Outfielders
Austin Hays
Trey Mancini (trade)
Anthony Santander (maybe)

So no, I don't see a 40-man crunch of concern by Elias.




 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That you know how to bold things?

So someone who was hired as an executive vice president makes more than prior first year general mangers?  Shocking.

I think it shows that he was a talent in high demands, and if they wanted a cheap body, that could have been easy to find, even in house.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Let's be honest here, the only players on the 40-man roster that should concern Elias are ones that either will be part of a winning future in 2-3 years, or can bring in players by trade for players who may.

Out of that list, the following players should be protected: (And I'm stretching it for some)

Pitchers:
Keegan Akin (maybe)
Miguel Castro
Alex Cobb (Trade potential)
Mychal Givens (trade)
Hunter Harvey
Dean Kremer (maybe)
John Means
Tanner Scott (stretch)

Catchers:
None

Infielders:
Ryan Mountcastle
Renato Nunez (stretch)

Outfielders
Austin Hays
Trey Mancini (trade)
Anthony Santander (maybe)

So no, I don't see a 40-man crunch of concern by Elias.




 

I can't agree with this.  

The O's will be play in 90+ degree heat and high humidity.  How long do you want he games to last?  4 hours?   If pitchers can't get out of innings that is where this is headed.  There are pitchers that are not on your list that may be able to lower the game time.

I am interested to see if Holaday's experience can help the young pitchers or just pitchers in general.

The way Covid is going several players or maybe more could test positive.   They need to keep as many players as they can just to get through the season without being force to call up players that they don't want to call up.

There is more to this season then just who will be with he team in 2023 or who can be traded IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Not grumpy, just facts.  A lot of these guys are just interchangeable.  

There are vast territories filled with guys who OPS .677 and have a 5.44 ERA.  If Elias is very, very diligent he could push the Orioles to 19 wins this year, and one of those gems could mentor the heck out of Ryan Mountcastle and get him an extra 25 career hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Etzel's playable in CF by all accounts. Just a meteoric rise, As we've seen with Beavers, sustaining a hot start in Bowie can sometimes be a challenge.
    • So last night, 7/3, Julio Rodriguez didn't make the catch on that 2-run double by O'Hearn.  It was a long run, but that looked like it should have been caught.  Then Hayes made a nice diving catch in LF and Santander made that sliding grab in RF.  I was wondering about the catch probability of those plays and where you guys get those stats/ details.  I'm thinking the Rodriquez play was less likely caught than the other two, but Santander might have been close.  I'm trying to get a handle on this stat, because of what was discussed in the last thread (...that I couldn't locate) and the understanding that how spectacular a catch might look might not be a good indicator of probability. My untrained eyes say Rodriguez was most unlikely, followed by Santander, and then Hayes.  I'm probably completely wrong.
    • I thought of it but decided the FCL thread was more relevant. But your more than welcome to.
    • Remember Komi Uehera?  Great splitter. The problem was you have to throw the fastball to set it up. He had an average fastball. The Red Sox did ride him to a WS though. 
    • July 1: Chayce McDermott, 7 IP, 12 K’s July 4: Yeiber Cartaya, 4 IP, 10 K’s.   It’s possible I’ve missed one or two so far.    
    • He is such an interesting case. Obviously the extraordinarily late “breakout” age, but you also just almost never see a true one-pitch pitcher in today’s game. Aside from the splitter, he has no ML-quality pitches. The 4-seam fastball is mediocre at best in velocity for a reliever (94.6 MPH), it’s on the straighter side, and it gets tagged to the tune of a .405 wOBA (with a .400 xWOBA to match). It’s a bottom-tier 4-seamer.  And then he throws a cutter 27% of the time. A cutter which is so bad that I can only imagine Palmer would have a coronary watching him continue to throw it. It is arguably the worst pitch in baseball this season, and over the course of his two ML seasons, hitters are posting a .486 wOBA against it. What’s most shocking is that StatCast suggests he’s been lucky to get that outcome, with a staggering .511 xWOBA on two seasons worth of cutters.    Ah, but then you have that splitter. The gift from God. And it really is, to be honest. This is a dude who would be working some every day job like the rest of us if he didn’t somehow master that splitter. But he did, and now he’s making bank playing a game. So far this season, 81 PAs ending on a splitter. Opponents have 4 hits against it (.056 BA). All those hits have been singles. 53 of those PAs ended with the hitter slinking back to the dugout (a cool 65.1% K rate), and it carries a 58.1% whiff rate. The average EV against the splitter this year is 76.7 MPH. The two-year wOBA on the splitter is .133, with a .137 xWOBA to match. Those are goofy numbers. Those are the numbers my 5-year-old nephew will put up against my best wiffleball arsenal this afternoon.    In sum, really interesting guy. Only having one effective pitch concerns me — on the days when the splitter is not splitting, he’s useless. The splitter has gotten more effective this year, not less, so that does assuage some of my concerns about the league eventually getting the book on him and spitting on the splitter in order to wait for a chance to pulverize the other junk he tosses. But is he a guy you can run out 4-5 times against the same elite hitters in a short span in October? It just seems like they’d have to get a solid feel for him after seeing a few times back to back. But if all it would cost is someone like Billy Cook, there’s really no harm done in finding out. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...