Jump to content

How does Elias maintain a Top 10 farm system without high draft choices


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Bought out a year of FA, but also gives cost certainty on the arb years.

Here is where it gets into game theory and metaphysics, but I think it bought out two years of FA for 2/22 if the options are exercised, except that if he hadn't signed the preseason deal, he would have had something to work on to defer his actual free agency to what is now the second option year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The goal is to win the World Series. By the time there is not a top notch farm system and the draft picks are lower than now, the Orioles hopefully will be World Champs.  Only the money machine franchises like NYY, LAD, etc can have both at the same time.  The Orioles need to beg, borrow and steal from the Farm for use ASAP to reach the real goal, WS Champs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Oriole1940 said:

The goal is to win the World Series. By the time there is not a top notch farm system and the draft picks are lower than now, the Orioles hopefully will be World Champs.  Only the money machine franchises like NYY, LAD, etc can have both at the same time.  The Orioles need to beg, borrow and steal from the Farm for use ASAP to reach the real goal, WS Champs.  

The Rays have the best record in the American league and the top ranked farm system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to have top 10 international signing classes. That would be a big step. Right now we’re dead last - bottom five, every year. 
 

I wouldn’t worry about us not having a top 10 pick this year. Not to be negative, but we’re in a bit of a free fall. Also, we have 15 games left. 11 against ATL, TB, and Toronto. I think we go 5-10 at best. Put it like this, I don’t think we’re going to have to “try” to lose. 
 

We’re set to pick #9 right now. We’ll finish with a top 5 pick. Maybe 3rd. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We have to have top 10 international signing classes. That would be a big step. Right now we’re dead last - bottom five, every year. 
 

I wouldn’t worry about us not having a top 10 pick this year. Not to be negative, but we’re in a bit of a free fall. Also, we have 15 games left. 11 against ATL, TB, and Toronto. I think we go 5-10 at best. Put it like this, I don’t think we’re going to have to “try” to lose. 
 

We’re set to pick #9 right now. We’ll finish with a top 5 pick. Maybe 3rd. 

I think the bolded was true 3 years ago. Two years ago it changed. This year was "who knows?" I wouldn't be shocked if this upcoming international class is top 10 or even top 5. It's a stated goal and relatively cheap to do. I expect it has already changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I think the bolded was true 3 years ago. Two years ago it changed. This year was "who knows?" I wouldn't be shocked if this upcoming international class is top 10 or even top 5. It's a stated goal and relatively cheap to do. I expect it has already changed.

I think because most of the top kids are usually recruited for 2+ years before they officially sign, and often have oral agreements with teams, our first year competing on an even playing field with the other teams will be 2021.  That said, we did make some progress with our 2019 class, and there were rumors of a few good signings in the 2020 class, though the official signing date has been moved from July to January so we don’t know who we will sign.   And of course, the DSL didn’t play this year (nor the “Tricky League” so far as I know), so it’s really hard to judge the 2019 class other than whatever people believed at this time last year.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I think the bolded was true 3 years ago. Two years ago it changed. This year was "who knows?" I wouldn't be shocked if this upcoming international class is top 10 or even top 5. It's a stated goal and relatively cheap to do. I expect it has already changed.

Two years ago they were still at the bottom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • ZiPS being an inhuman thing incapable of recency bias is not much out on Holliday.    It only dings his 2025-2029 forecast WAR by about 3% today relative to what it was forecasting this spring. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/reassessing-the-future-for-this-seasons-disappointing-rookies/ Jackson Holliday’s numbers didn’t take a big hit for a few reasons. First, and most importantly, despite a really lousy debut in the majors, he played well enough in the minors — plus he’s so young and his résumé is so strong — that his small-sample struggles barely register. By reverse-o-fying Holliday’s major league woes into an untranslated minor league line and including it in his overall Triple-A production, ZiPS estimates that he would’ve had a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A this season, down from his actual mark of 142. A 20-year-old shortstop with a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A would still top everybody’s prospect list.
    • Kjerstad should also get some reps in at first so he can be an option there as well, although now is probably not the time, best for him to DH for the rest of the season. He had 8 starts at first at AAA this season and 37 starts there between AA and AAA in 2023.
    • In Grich’s case, I think his OBP skills weren’t appreciated at the time.  He was a .266 lifetime hitter in an era when that was maybe 10 points above average, but his .371 OBP was more like 45-50 points above average.  But OBP just wasn’t very valued at the time.  
    • We don’t have a current combo that is ideal. You have to go with the best possible grouping you have.
    • Yep, we're in agreement on the 70 rWAR threshold.  A championship would help Manny's cause, though I'm not sure if that's in the cards for him in the near future.  He needs a big moment on a big stage, too....as silly as that sounds, I do believe it matters in the eyes of some voters. Not to derail, but Whitaker is a guy that belongs in the HoF, too.  I'm not sure why Grich never got serious consideration.
    • I’ve always felt that 70 rWAR was the line between having to justify why someone shouldn’t be in the HOF versus justifying why they should.  In other words, if you’re over 70, there needs to be a reason for you NOT to be in.  There are 70 position players over 70 WAR, and the only ones not in are Bonds, Pujols (not yet eligible), Trout (not yet eligible), Rose, Bill Dahlen, Lou Whitaker, Raffy Palmeiro, Bobby Grich, and Carlos Beltran.  Really, only Dahlen, Whitaker and Grich have no obvious reason why they’re not in.  And I wouldn’t bet against Beltran getting in eventually.  He’s gotten  46% and 57% of the ballots his first two tries.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...