Jump to content

Tracking Ex Oriole Thread


Rene88

Recommended Posts

o

 

This was Gonzalez' rehab start.

He is scheduled to rejoin the White Sox' rotation next week.

 

13 OUTS: 7 Strikeouts, 4 Groundouts, 1 Flyout, 1 Out Stretching a Single

 

MIGUEL ANGEL GONZALEZ MARTIN o))))o (vs. AAA-Norfolk, 9/02)

IP:l )l4.33

H:;; l11 ll(2 Home Runs, 5 Doubles, 4 Singles)

R:l)l)l7

ER:)ll6

BB:)ll0

SO:)ll7

Pitches: 74 )(57 )Strikes, )17 )Balls)

2016 ERA: 4.64 )(AAA-Charlotte)

 

PITCHES BY INNING

**************************

32 ll(24 lStrikes, ll8 llBalls)

13 ll(12 lStrikes, ll1 llBalls)

10 ll(71 lStrikes, ll3 llBalls)

13 ll(10 lStrikes, ll3 llBalls)

61 ll(41 lStrikes, ll2 l.Balls) *

 

* Gonzalez recorded 1 out before departing in the 5th inning.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick has hit far better than I anticipated this year. That said, his OPS+ is still lower than all three of the Orioles "regular" outfielders. I haven't seen him play defense this year, but I'm sure he's a better defensive OF than Trumbo (not hard) and probably better than Kim (almost certainly better). I was against signing him, but he would have been far more useful to the O's than I expected.

Are you arguing that he'd be preferable to Trumbo? Kim, maybe, but Kim has almost 1/4 of the salary on an annual basis.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you arguing that he'd be preferable to Trumbo? Kim, maybe, but Kim has almost 1/4 of the salary on an annual basis.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In a better constructed roster Trumbo is the DH and a better defender who can hit at least decently is the RF. They thought they had Fowler so the current roster wasn't really the plan. I was mainly just thinking out loud while being surprised by Markakis' season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Markakis has a positive defensive WAR score this season. I swear there's a Camden Yards bias with that stat for outfielders.
I'm yet to hear/read a resolution to that question.

It was addressed a few years ago by the creator of one of the metrics (I think it was Clay Davenport), but I wasn't very satisfied with the logic of the answer. I've kind of settled in a middle ground: the metrics show that Jones and Markakis are not as good as some Orioles fans think they are, but they also haven't been as bad as the metrics have sometimes suggested.

Just by way of example, fangraphs gave Nick a -14.1 in 2013. Trumbo has a -14.5 this year. There's just no way on God's green earth that Nick was ever nearly as bad an outfielder as Trumbo. Anybody with two eyes knows this, and I really don't give a damn what fangraphs' stats say about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was addressed a few years ago by the creator of one of the metrics (I think it was Clay Davenport), but I wasn't very satisfied with the logic of the answer. I've kind of settled in a middle ground: the metrics show that Jones and Markakis are not as good as some Orioles fans think they are, but they also haven't been as bad as the metrics have sometimes suggested.

Just by way of example, fangraphs gave Nick a -14.1 in 2013. Trumbo has a -14.5 this year. There's just no way on God's green earth that Nick was ever nearly as bad an outfielder as Trumbo. Anybody with two eyes knows this, and I really don't give a damn what fangraphs' stats say about it.

It goes beyond Os fans I think. The big thing, I thought, was that the metrics showed that jones and kakes weren't as good as pretty much everyone thought they were.

I get what you're saying, though. Any chance you have a link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It goes beyond Os fans I think. The big thing, I thought, was that the metrics showed that jones and kakes weren't as good as pretty much everyone thought they were.

I get what you're saying, though. Any chance you have a link?

Sorry, I don't. I think it was addressed in the hard copy annual Baseball Prospectus, or in an iteration of The Fielding Bible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh ok. Thanks for your responses. Could you possibly relay what you remember the crux of his explanation to be? Sorry to needle you on this.

I found some discussion of this from an old thread: http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php/138272-About-Adam-Jones-Defense?p=3352896#post3352896. It was John Dewan who addressed the issue, not Clay Davenport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One year sample sizes on defensive metrics aren't very useful when evaluating true talent, as always. He was a negative defender just last year, in Atlanta. For his career, the metrics have Markakis around average which seems just about right to me. He was pretty good in his youth and declined from there.

Even with positive ratings this year, he's going to likely end up a below average starter. If you like rWAR, he's been equal to Adam Jones in value this year. He's got that going for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s the latest out of the Mile High City…

Gerardo Parra has been getting time at first base for the Rockies, and manager Walt Weiss hinted to reporters (including MLB.com’s Ben Weinrib) that Parra could remain at the position for the rest of the season. Parra had never played first base at the professional level prior to August 24, though if the Rox are comfortable with him as a first base option going forward, it could solve their outfield logjam.

MlBTR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Carter's got his OPS around .800 and with this news it looks fairly sure Carter over Langford is the Rangers guy same as Cowser over Holliday looks probable here for 2024 only performance.  
    • Remember, this is not me suggesting these...   I'd do the following: Tier One: Superstar for Superstar Prospects Division: Rhett Lowder for Jackson Holliday Big-time trades take big-time... guts. Lowder's been nails, while Holliday struggled greatly in his first cup of coffee. That said, he's absolutely loaded with talent. This would be a case of trying to strike while the iron was hot and would likely take a second prospect as well. (I'm guessing Edwin Arroyo might do it, though he might not.) Still, Holliday is the only reason I'd consider moving EDLC to another defensive spot-- likely 3B, with Marte moving to RF when he comes off the suspended list. Unlikely? Of, for sure. Impossible? Probably. But that's what it'd take to get me to part with Lowder at this point. Tier Two: Division One Starters Andrew Abbott or Graham Ashcraft for Ryan Mountcastle, Heston Kjerstad or Coby Mayo (AAA) Mayo's killing it in AAA and has all the attributes CES had last year. Kjerstad just has "it"-- it seems like he's a tough out I hated to see up to the plate this weekend. Both will be better. Abbott or Ashcraft makes some sense, then, as a partner. It'd hurt short-term to see one of them go. Long-term? The Reds probably win that trade. Tier Three: Division Two Starters Brandon Williamson for Ryan Mountcastle Mountcastle is a solidly average OF currently playing above his pay grade. Speaking of, he's going to get expensive relatively soon. I'd guess Baltimore might be inclined to get more playing time for its other players at the expense of a relative spare part. Mountcastle is that. For the Reds, he'd be a fine LF/ DH/ 1B option and a RH hitter. Tier Four: Maybe for Maybe Chase Petty or Connor Phillip for Sam Basallo Petty and Phillips have been major disappointments. I'd consider just about any Red pitching prospect aside from Lowder at this point. Basallo is a 19-year-old holding his own as a catcher in AA. It'd likely take both Petty and Noelvi Marte to make that deal happen, but I'd do it gladly. JAG for JAG Lucas Sims, et al, for Ryan McKenna Relievers are fungible, and Baltimore might well need more as the season wears on. Dealing for McKenna strengthens the Red bench. (I loathe Bubba.) I hope the Orioles would hang up the phone laughing at any of these proposals.
    • Wild idea...could Grayson be the closer we need?
    • Agreed, but he missed bats as a starter so there’s no reason he shouldn’t do it as a reliever.  He also touched 96-97 as a starter so I eventually expect that or better as a reliever.   It’s a new routine and a new role.  I’m hoping and expecting more.
    • Cowser looked good yesterday but he’s going to get pounded with changeups against any RH that’s got a good one.  At the very least he has to lay off the ones out of the strike zone but if he can’t learn to hit it, it’s going to hold him back.  The book is out.  
    • Yeah, definitely took care of business, but it wasn’t exactly what I was looking for. I didn’t see any data, but by my eye test he didn’t miss a ton of bats. It might just be that my hopes for him are a little too elevated. We will see.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...