Jump to content

Heyman: Yankees will pursue Teixeira hard...as we all expected, I suppose


DrLev

Recommended Posts

Read this and then tell me he's a clubhouse problem:

We'd be lucky to have a guy like that on the Orioles.

That's a pretty strong counter-argument, JTrea, to other things I've read on this board about Tex. No, I don't have a link. But it would be interesting to see this clubhouse thing laid out more comprehensively, as I personally don't know what to conclude about it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply
BTW, I think the biggest risk is him coming home and trying too hard.

Considering the pressure he had with the Braves being traded for a ransom and then being traded again for a playoff run, I think he'll do just fine under that pressure situation. Atlanta was somewhat home to him as he played at GT and his wife was from the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, I think the biggest risk is him coming home and trying too hard.

Completely agree... It happens way too often for it not to be at least a small concern.

Considering the pressure he had with the Braves being traded for a ransom and then being traded again for a playoff run, I think he'll do just fine under that pressure situation.

Not the same by any stretch... Franchise savior is a lot more of a burden than additional bat for a playoff run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, I think the biggest risk is him coming home and trying too hard.
That's a good point. But it seems like there's an awful lot of cases in which a FA, even one who's not in the Welcome Back Kotter mode, is a different player after switching teams. Does it mean you should never go after a fairly high-priced FA (let alone a VERY-high-priced one)? Of course not. But that too is an added risk element.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good point. But it seems like there's an awful lot of cases in which a FA, even one who's not in the Welcome Home Kotter mode, is a different player after switching teams. Does it mean you should never go after a fairly high-priced FA (let alone a VERY-high-priced one)? Of course not. But that too is an added risk element.

Tex is probably the least risky big time FA that has come along in a long time.

I can't think of one I was more confident about except maybe Vlad but even Vlad had the back stuff hanging over him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely agree... It happens way too often for it not to be at least a small concern.

Not the same by any stretch... Franchise savior is a lot more of a burden than additional bat for a playoff run.

Well it's not like he won't have a supporting cast. Markakis, Wieters, Jones will all be there as well as Huff and Roberts hopefully. If anything I think those guys will take some pressure off Tex and he will in turn take the spotlight off of them. Wieters will have a ton of pressure in his first season to live up to the hype but Tex can help take some of that away. Markakis is already being pitched around considering he's the best hitter on the team, Teixeira can help fix that, as teams would rather pitch to Markakis IMO.

To counter, Carlos Lee has done well in Houston since since signing a huge deal with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it's not like he won't have a supporting cast. Markakis, Wieters, Jones will all be there as well as Huff and Roberts hopefully.

Griffey, for example, was "the guy" when he went back to Cincinatti because he didn't have a huge supporting cast. Injuries are really to blame for his problems obviously.

To counter, Carlos Lee has done well in Houston since since signing a huge deal with them.

It's not the pressure of being a big FA signing although there is pressure in that as well... Carlos Lee wasn't going home so it's not comparable in the way that Griffey is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tex is probably the least risky big time FA that has come along in a long time.

I can't think of one I was more confident about except maybe Vlad but even Vlad had the back stuff hanging over him.

I don't know how you can make that statement without knowing how long his contract ends up being. A ten year contract for Teix would be extremly risky and a lot riskier than many recent shorter term big money deals. I agree the risk is somewhat low relative to many other FAs considering his track record staying healthy, position and age over the next couple of years but all that changes if in the extreme we're talking about a 10 year contract. (And I know, it's highly unlikely he gets 10 years, just using that number to illustrate the point).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it. Only way we'll ever wake up is to keep getting our heads bashed in. I hope they sign all of them, win 150 games. I hope we win the head-to-head with them though. :D As WC said, tune in around 2012.

I know you guys are talking tongue in cheek, but I have suffered enough, and will not "wait until 2012" for a winning team! That's complete BS! MacPhail better get on his horse and make some splashes this year with a stacked FA class, or he should be canned. That's right, I said it. Burnett and Tex have all but said that if they are paid they will come here. All MacPhail has to do is make them an offer they can't refuse. Not too difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible. I think we'll have to offer more years and considerably more money. If any playoff caliber team is close on the offer, they'll win.

What is a playoff caliber team?

The Rays are in the World Series, and they were NOT a playoff caliber team last offseason.

The Astros and Mariners traded the farm for Bedard and Tejada because they "thought" they were a playoff team. No playoffs.

The Tigers were supposed to be the best offensive team we had ever seen. No playoffs.

The Rockies represented the National League in the WS last year. No playoffs.

The two New York teams spend like mad to win the whole damn thing every year. No playoffs for either of them.

My point is, there is a fine line between a playoff caliber team and a pretender. If the Orioles were to sign Tex, Burnett, a Mussina type, get a starting ss, and a backup catcher, there would be a whole lot less "IFs" to worry about for the forseable future, and we could easly become what the Rays were this year.

So while some say Tex will sign with a "playoff contender" I still stand by my reasoning that he'll sign with the team that gives him the best offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not too worried if Tex goes to the Yankees. Imean if they want to fork out that kind of dough then by all means let them. The Orioles can be a very good team without Tex. IMO

Good perspective. It would be nice if we landed him w/a contract that made sense for the Orioles franchise. However, one player will not make or break this franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not too worried if Tex goes to the Yankees. Imean if they want to fork out that kind of dough then by all means let them. The Orioles can be a very good team without Tex. IMO

They can but if you are talking about Dunn he's like Will Clark to Tex being Palmeiro. If the Orioles don't get Tex, they should just blow the whole team up including trading Guthrie and Markakis. I just don't see MacPhail trading young pitching to get the hitting and position players that we need.

Given the way MacPhail's philosophy is, Tex is must have this offseason, not a luxury, if we want to compete in the next four years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can but if you are talking about Dunn he's like Will Clark to Tex being Palmeiro. If the Orioles don't get Tex, they should just blow the whole team up including trading Guthrie and Markakis. I just don't see MacPhail trading young pitching to get the hitting and position players that we need.

Given the way MacPhail's philosophy is, Tex is must have this offseason, not a luxury, if we want to compete in the next four years.

Explain your thinking in a bit more detail... If we don't land Tex why do you believe it's hopeless for MacPhail to address 1b like the AL Champions addressed their 1b situation? Why do you think MacPhail would be incapable of addressing the need for a 1b like his previous organization did? I understand the desire to make a splash and have the O's on the front page for something positive but I really do not understand the thought process that the organization is doomed if Boras picks somewhere other than Baltimore of Tex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explain your thinking in a bit more detail... If we don't land Tex why do you believe it's hopeless for MacPhail to address 1b like the AL Champions addressed their 1b situation? Why do you think MacPhail would be incapable of addressing the need for a 1b like his previous organization did? I understand the desire to make a splash and have the O's on the front page for something positive but I really do not understand the thought process that the organization is doomed if Boras picks somewhere other than Baltimore of Tex.

I agree. The rampant alarmist thinking that the world will come to an end if the Orioles don't land Mark Texeira is downright humorous. If Tex was all that how come he didn't propel the Angels ( a much better and stacked team all the way around than the Orioles) straight to the WS? The Orioles are so pitching poor that worrying over any position player is like, so far down on the list it isn't even on the list of worries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...