Jump to content

Foolish Baseball


LookinUp

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, now said:

Hmm, I'm getting a strong deja vu looking at this list:

* Zac Lowther had a 2.55 ERA (13-7, age 23)
* Alexander Wells had a 2.95 ERA (8-6, age 22)
* Michael Baumann had a 2.31 ERA (6-2, age 23)
* Dean Kremer had a 2.98 ERA (9-4, age 23)
* Bruce Zimmermann had a 2.58 ERA (5-3, age 24)

... going back to Bowie's staff (division champs) in 2008:

* Jason Berken 12-4, 3.58, age 24
* Brad Bergesen 15-6, 3.22, age 22
* David Hernandez 10-4, 2.68, age 23
* Chris Tillman 11-4, 3.18, age 20
* Zach Clark 4-2, 3.60, age 24

Gaudy W-L records aside, that earlier squad had ERAs roughly a run worse than our current "band" of hopefuls. It produced one decent ML starter (Tillman) and reliever (Hernandez). Obviously Tillman's age at that level sets him apart. Otherwise I like our chances of improving the overall outcome in future MLB ceilings. What do you in-house talent scouts think of this comp?

Thing that stands out to me is ERAs are even better with current group.  
 

Tough to compare when there is different leadership now too.  New theory’s and technology used with current group.  Time will only tell.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, now said:

Hmm, I'm getting a strong deja vu looking at this list:

* Zac Lowther had a 2.55 ERA (13-7, age 23)
* Alexander Wells had a 2.95 ERA (8-6, age 22)
* Michael Baumann had a 2.31 ERA (6-2, age 23)
* Dean Kremer had a 2.98 ERA (9-4, age 23)
* Bruce Zimmermann had a 2.58 ERA (5-3, age 24)

... going back to Bowie's staff (division champs) in 2008:

* Jason Berken 12-4, 3.58, age 24
* Brad Bergesen 15-6, 3.22, age 22
* David Hernandez 10-4, 2.68, age 23
* Chris Tillman 11-4, 3.18, age 20
* Zach Clark 4-2, 3.60, age 24

Gaudy W-L records aside, that earlier squad had ERAs roughly a run worse than our current "band" of hopefuls. It produced one decent ML starter (Tillman) and reliever (Hernandez). Obviously Tillman's age at that level sets him apart. Otherwise I like our chances of improving the overall outcome in future MLB ceilings. What do you in-house talent scouts think of this comp?

Talent level is vastly better with this current group imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Talent level is vastly better with this current group imo.

Hope so.   I think Tillman had more national recognition than anyone on last year’s Bowie staff, though.  BA had him at 22nd, BP 16th after that 2008 season.   I’d actually be pretty pleased if anyone on last year’s Bowie staff had a five-year run like Tillman had in 2012-16.    I really liked Tilly; it’s a shame that his shoulder didn’t hold up.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Hope so.   I think Tillman had more national recognition than anyone on last year’s Bowie staff, though.  BA had him at 22nd, BP 16th after that 2008 season.   I’d actually be pretty pleased if anyone on last year’s Bowie staff had a five-year run like Tillman had in 2012-16.    I really liked Tilly; it’s a shame that his shoulder didn’t hold up.   

Yea, Tillman was the highest ranked guy although I never understood why.

But as a group, I think these guys are more talented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because his stuff projected to work the best at the major league level?

They weren't wrong.

Yea but I never saw a  top 20 prospect in all of baseball.  I also wondered why teams didn’t light him up.  Never really impressed me even when he was having good years.

Of course, he probably had a better career than a lot of the guys who have been ranked that high.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Yea but I never saw a  top 20 prospect in all of baseball.  I also wondered why teams didn’t light him up.  Never really impressed me even when he was having good years.

Of course, he probably had a better career than a lot of the guys who have been ranked that high.  

Oh, I get it.

I thought you meant you didn't see why he was rated higher than the rest of that group. 

I'll agree that Tillman didn't strike me as a top 20 in all of baseball prospect.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cowser’s  swing decisions are determined before the pitch is even thrown. And I’ve been saying this all year, and I even said this at the game. I go it’s too early to pinch it for him because his defense is too good but he is 100% going to strike out and that’s exactly what he did with bases loaded. He decides whether he is going to swing a pitch before even thrown This is why he swings at a thrown pretty close to his face . And To be fair,he  had a pretty good season doing that but obviously can be  easily exploited
    • Cowser's progress was one of the more encouraging elements this season, especially on the defensive side. I was already crediting him with being Some Kind of Good major leaguer a post back. Between his and Adley's standout bad performances on the HBP and 2-0 count, I give Cowser more of a grace.     Sure he had predetermined intent to swing, but I think the follow through was some raw instinct as hand bones fractured. Adley not swinging was the lowlight how incapacitated he was.    I believe he commands the strike zone, but to feel so low you can't pull the trigger in that spot...sheesh.
    • I believe Elias plans to bring in two more SP's, the quality isnt what im sure about. But no question he'll want to replace Burnes. Which is why I didnt comment in this thread yet because Povich might not have a spot open at the beginning of the year. 
    • So a “Pollyanna” then like me, @wildcard and others (joking of course) 😇 I’m in your camp but really wonder if Elias/Hyde and Co. can truly“flip the script” as @Just Regular alludes.
    • So thats because the extra space in the OF allows for more balls to fall in? If so, I don't really see an issue if its providing offense in a different way. 
    • I'm neutral on it. I don't like how the old dimensions played like a wiffle ball field. Both teams have to play on it and the O's do have two good OF's so in that sense it helps us. RHH will probably hate it so very few would ever sign in Baltimore unless they thought the O's were in World Series contention. If they put it in the middle ground then the dimensions become like every other park and Im not sure I want that. At least Camden Yards plays different. 
    • I agree with this.  It was a completely idiotic take to criticize the fans.  And Russo on MLB Network did as well.  Did those guys watch this team at all this year? They were under .500 for the last 88 games of the season.....the worst team in the AL East.  These were the home series they played over the last three months: Chicago Cubs (swept and outscored 21-2), Yankees (lost 2 of 3 and needed two Yankee errors to walk off the last one), San Diego (lost 2 of 3), Toronto (won 3 of 4), Washington (split 1 of 2), Boston (split 2 of 4), Houston (split 2 of 4), White Sox (won 2 of 3 but lost last one 8-1), Tampa (lost 2 of 3), San Fran (lost 2 of 3), Detroit (lost 2 of 3). What is that, 15 - 20 in their last 35 home games?  And then they top it off by losing to the Royals 1 - 0 in the first game?  So fans are supposed to be excited and encouraged by that stretch of baseball?   You want people to show up to games, play like the Padres. Don't have your prized prospects go bust, don't have your stars fall off a cliff, and learn how to play fundamental baseball instead of obsessing about each swing's potential exit velocity.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...