Jump to content

2021 Orioles #12 Prospect - Samuel Basallo - C


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Reading the report, it seems like Tony definitely spoke to one or more people in the organization about Basallo.

I’m hoping he can play well enough next year to get the Mayo treatment and spend a few weeks at Delmarva towards the end of the year.   It’ll be interesting to see how he stacks up against Creed Willems, who’s about 14 months older.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Tony, do you still use the criteria of “I would rather have player X over a guy like Basallo” when deciding on where to place him?

With such little info on him, I would think that’s a bit harder to do it that way?

I had a nice little talk with Koby Perez (thanks to Mike Elias) who gave me some good stuff on the guys to know down in the DSL and the FCL. I became more bullish on Basallo and some others. If you look at Perez's success with Cleveland, he's a pretty good source and didn't seem to be giving fluff. 

Saying that, this is definitely a pure upside ceiling pick. He's got at extreme risk due to his age and distance away from the big leagues, but he's got impact power hitting skills and showed decent plate discipline for his age and inexperience. 

I guess in my mind, I'll take a flyer on a kid who could end up an impact bat who is athletic, flexible, has a great arm, and plays a premium position. Obviously with extreme risk he could be a big mover on this list next year in either direction. I'd love to see him put up some nice numbers in the FCL next year at 17 and be in Delmarva to start 2023 at 18. If he puts up numbers there then I think he legitimizes his prospect status.

This is an aggressive placement for sure.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Basallo and Willems' power upside make me nostalgic for those fine old times when Carlos Delgado was a catching prospect.   Their timelines can become half if they have the Mayo thunder, but it is probably going to take until Adley retires for either of them to become a better catcher than him.

Nice pull with Delgado as catcher prospect.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

 

Never realized he hit LH. We have a nice collection of hitting prospects that either hit LH or SH. 
 

I feel so good about our system right now, that I feel like the only thing missing is that big time DSL signing. Land a guy in the top 5-10 range. 
 

Perez is definitely building something good down there. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...