Jump to content

MLB Lockout Thread


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

We have no one who is the steward for the game. Neither the owners or players care about the game or the fans, they care about making the most money that they can. 

I'm about to drop a bunch of money on new servers and site design only to have a sport that probably won't be playing for awhile. Why? Because of outright greed by the both sides.

Manfred is the worse commissioner in the history of the game and the Player union leads are greedy union heads who are more worried about getting themselves rich then worrying about the game and the fans. 

Since the very fact that neither sides cares about the game or fans and just thinks whenever the get things settled the fans will just be there, makes me very, very concerned that we won't see baseball until June or July.

I hope I'm wrong, but when it's early January and they don't even have scheduled talks, it show us they are no hurry to get a deal done so the season starts on time. 

First we had COVID that cost us games, and now we have greed that will cost us games.

Sadly greed and egos has been around MLB long before covid, and for the most part, COVID can be treated.

Not sure, how you fight greed. There is too damn much money to share fairly among all the parties.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

We have no one who is the steward for the game. Neither the owners or players care about the game or the fans, they care about making the most money that they can. 

I'm about to drop a bunch of money on new servers and site design only to have a sport that probably won't be playing for awhile. Why? Because of outright greed by the both sides.

Manfred is the worse commissioner in the history of the game and the Player union leads are greedy union heads who are more worried about getting themselves rich then worrying about the game and the fans. 

Since the very fact that neither sides cares about the game or fans and just thinks whenever the get things settled the fans will just be there, makes me very, very concerned that we won't see baseball until June or July.

I hope I'm wrong, but when it's early January and they don't even have scheduled talks, it show us they are no hurry to get a deal done so the season starts on time. 

First we had COVID that cost us games, and now we have greed that will cost us games.

 

 

 

Tony Clark is incompetent. And I don’t mean that to say that he is an educated or not smart. He’s incompetent to deal with the task that he has. I don’t know why he was elected to his position but it wasn’t because of his skill at performing the duties associated with it.

Manfred is also incompetent, as well as So arrogant as to be almost a caricature.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Philip said:

Tony Clark is incompetent. And I don’t mean that to say that he is an educated or not smart. He’s incompetent to deal with the task that he has. I don’t know why he was elected to his position but it wasn’t because of his skill at performing the duties associated with it.

Manfred is also incompetent, as well as So arrogant as to be almost a caricature.

 

Both Pit Bulls tho. Which is exactly why they gut their jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Philip said:

I am astonished that everything that’s been proposed so far doesn’t deal with the problem facing baseball. Expanding the playoffs because playoff baseball is interesting doesn’t address the problem of baseball games not being interesting. Why not make baseball interesting so that all the games are interesting and not just playoff games. And one proposal to eliminate tanking Is to give the first pick in the draft to the best of the non-playoff teams. Which is… Inexplicable is the kindest word that comes to mind.

It is ridiculous that two groups of educated people can’t even identify A problem, And that needs to happen before they can begin to discuss a solution.

If they wanted to make the game more interesting, they'd increase the amount of players on the field to 11.  Actually, you'd have the home team and the away team on the same field at the same time, each with 11 players, so 22 players in total.

Then, you'd stretch the diamond until it's a rectangle shape, 160 feet wide, 120 yards long.  

Instead of a baseball, they'd have an oblong leather ball that one team would try to advance down the field against the other team that's defending.  To do this, they could either throw the ball through the air or have someone run the ball against the defense.  And the only way you could stop that team from scoring would be to give them 4 attempts to make it past 10 yards...if they don't, they have to give the defense the ball.  

Teams would score when they've moved the ball into a designated area of 10 yards deep, 160 feet wide at the end of the field, otherwise known as an end-zone.  That's 6 points.  Then, they get a chance to kick the oblong ball through these metal posts for an additional point, or they can run another play from 2 yards out to get 2 points.  

It's a work in progress, but that's a rough idea of how it would be better.  That would be a vastly more interesting game than what they have now.  

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I wonder how much the pandemic factors into the owners owner's strategy. I suspect there be more of a hardline if there a restrictions on crowds or crowd size again.

If they can put 70000 fans into football stadiums they should have no reason not to open Baseball stadiums back up to full capacity when and if they actually play again.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

If they can put 70000 fans into football stadiums they should have no reason not to open Baseball stadiums back up to full capacity when and if they actually play again.

True.  I thought about after I posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, waroriole said:

https://nypost.com/2022/01/03/ken-rosenthal-out-at-mlb-network-over-rob-manfred-criticism/
 

With this loser presiding over negotiations who knows how this will go. 

You can't talk bad about the Emperor. With skin this thin who knows what will happen. At the end of the day, the owners are responsible for Manfred. They voted in this tool.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

If they can put 70000 fans into football stadiums they should have no reason not to open Baseball stadiums back up to full capacity when and if they actually play again.

Penn State and other colleges draw well over 100,000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don’t consider a 4 o’clock game a night game. He also caught Wednesday night and Thursday day this week. Moral of the story is McCann will start 4 games in 7 days because he is Burnes preferred catcher.
    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
    • I would be very surprised if every last one of the GM's Elias talks to about quality starting pitching doesn't start by asking about Westburg and the rest.  Again, I think it's a mistake to believe that the O's have a ton of leverage here.  They certainly have some, and Elias is smart and disciplined, but I don't see any bargains.  I especially don't see the luxury of acting like youth and multiple years of control is any kind of rigid starting point for the O's.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...