Jump to content

Teixeira watch part IX....The final stages?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Ok. That clears things up for me. I just always assumed that agents would have a clause of some sort to be present if said player wanted to talk to particular teams.

It's just like you retaining an attorney for a potential case against someone, but then work things out on your own.

An agent is just there to help you with the negotiation, legalese and paperwork, as well as advice. All decisions are made by the client.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I read somewhere in the past few days that Teixeira wanted to personally meet with each team's owner and GM before signing to make sure they were absolutely committed to winning. Did he meet any other owners, face-to-face, other than John Henry?

He likely met with AM and PA when all that Baltimore Ravens talk went down. He played for the Angels, so no need to meet with their people. There is something I wanted to bring up.

The Orioles should offer 9/190 with a NTC, w/o an opt out and require that someone else beat the offer. Boras is going to call around once the top offer comes in and request that teams beat it. I would imagine that every team will get that opportunity. I do not uderstand the whole years/dollars argument. If you were willing to give Mark 8/180 then why no go an extra year at $10 Million?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He likely met with AM and PA when all that Baltimore Ravens talk went down. He played for the Angels, so no need to meet with their people. There is something I wanted to bring up.

The Orioles should offer 9/190 with a NTC, w/o an opt out and require that someone else beat the offer. Boras is going to call around once the top offer comes in and request that teams beat it. I would imagine that every team will get that opportunity. I do not uderstand the whole years/dollars argument. If you were willing to give Mark 8/180 then why no go an extra year at $10 Million?

I really, really hate the opt out idea. All that means is we're renting him while we're bad (now) and will most likely lose him when we're good (2-3 years). At best, it means we're overpaying now and overpaying later to retain him when the market continues climbing upwards and $20 mil a year is considered nominal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.316 lifetime hitter. First ballot HOFer. Show some respect. (I hate the Yankees)

Great player, Cooperstown-bound. But still overrated in a massive, preposterous way.

Jeter winning Gold Glove awards is just as outrageous as giving a Gold Glove to Kevin Millar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just heard on espn980 from Kevin Sheehan that Tex has said he has not ruled out the Angels offer, dont know why he would come out and say that other than trying to get the other teams more desperate.

That's great Tex, but the Angels PULLED their offer off the table. Hard to accept something that doesn't exist.

Roch eluded to something in his blog about the longer this goes on, the more friends Tex is losing. He is on to something. I want Tex in Baltimore more than anything, but the longer he drags this out, the more he is pissing me off, and probably the front offices of all these teams as well. I am hoping from a Baltimore perspective that the Angels and Sox did indeed pull out and tell Boras to take a hike. Make Tex decide between two losing teams like us and Washington. That would be great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really, really hate the opt out idea. All that means is we're renting him while we're bad (now) and will most likely lose him when we're good (2-3 years). At best, it means we're overpaying now and overpaying later to retain him when the market continues climbing upwards and $20 mil a year is considered nominal.

That is why I mention w/o "with out" the opt out clause. If I was the top bidder then I wouldn't grant an opt out clause. Granting a NTC while approving an opt out clause would be poor judgement. We should at least be able to get something back for the guy at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He likely met with AM and PA when all that Baltimore Ravens talk went down. He played for the Angels, so no need to meet with their people. There is something I wanted to bring up.

The Orioles should offer 9/190 with a NTC, w/o an opt out and require that someone else beat the offer. Boras is going to call around once the top offer comes in and request that teams beat it. I would imagine that every team will get that opportunity. I do not uderstand the whole years/dollars argument. If you were willing to give Mark 8/180 then why no go an extra year at $10 Million?

He met with Arte Moreno of the Angels in Vegas during the Winter Meetings. He also met with the Nats GM (not sure if Lerner was there) in DC when he also met with AM and Angelos as well as Theo Epstein, so he basically has met with all teams/owners who are truly interested in signing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He met with Arte Moreno of the Angels in Vegas during the Winter Meetings. He also met with the Nats GM (not sure if Lerner was there) in DC when he also met with AM and Angelos as well as Theo Epstein, so he basically has met with all teams/owners who are truly interested in signing him.

I figured that it really wasn't a factor. If the Orioles called and offered him a 9/195 deal, he would be announced as an Oriole tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's great Tex, but the Angels PULLED their offer off the table. Hard to accept something that doesn't exist.

Roch eluded to something in his blog about the longer this goes on, the more friends Tex is losing. He is on to something. I want Tex in Baltimore more than anything, but the longer he drags this out, the more he is pissing me off, and probably the front offices of all these teams as well. I am hoping from a Baltimore perspective that the Angels and Sox did indeed pull out and tell Boras to take a hike. Make Tex decide between two losing teams like us and Washington. That would be great!

I agree. But if we do happen to nab Tex, and lock up BRob and Nick and nab some starting pitching before February, it'll all make sense. I'm starting to feel like we're the Trix Rabbit and Tex is a bowl of cerial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Keep him,  but certainly don't plan on him helping the team at all this year. 
    • I think 2024 showed how tricky the "Platoon Every Position" strategy can be when you have rookies and injuries. With the rookies, you never give them opportunities to hit the same side pitching if they're constantly being PH hit for (Kjerstad, Holliday, Mayo even). And in the event somebody gets hurt (example: Mountcastle) you're stuck with a poor defending infielder that puts your infield defense at risk and you're vulnerable against their weak side pitching.  I do think you can get away with *some* platoons, but last year was way, way, way too heavy on platooning.  All that said, the O's are in a pretty weird spot.  Here are their stats  (minimum 40 PA) at home, against lefties from 2024: Mateo - 333 AVG, 1.010 OPS Mountcastle - 346, 971 Santander - 250, 926 Westburg - 277, 857 Adley - 303, 818 Gunnar - 246, 764 Cowser - 200, 585 Mullins - 205, 489 Pretty easy to say why there was a dramatic dropoff in performance last year against lefties (Mateo, Mounty, Westy) all were hurt in the second half. Meaning it was Santander and Adley (and we know Adley fell off in the second half). Gunnar fell off a cliff in the second half. Now let's look at our hitters against RHP at home (minimum 40 PA): Gunnar - 309, 961 Westy - 312, 903 Mullins - 263, 880 Cowser - 263, 809 Urias - 245, 733 O'Hearn - 249, 698 Santander - 207, 697 Mountcastle - 244, 679 Adley - 195, 616 Holliday - 176, 495 So, the Elias strategy of focusing on LHH, SHH to take advantage of left field at Camden Yards works...until it doesn't. Gunnar, Westy (very good against LHH and RHH at homE), Cowser all Elias picks, and very good to excellent against righties at home. Awesome. Mullins was definitely valuable. But man, 6-10 is incredibly glaring. Santander was lackluster against righties at home. We can see that O'Hearn wasn't better than Mountcastle at home against righties, supposedly his specialty. And I wonder if it's because he likes to hit opposite field and the vast caverns of LF at OPACY had a lot of doubles/dingers taken from him.  But, man, Adley was nearly as bad as Holliday against righties, and that's not acceptable.  So, they definitely need Adley and Holliday to do infinitely better against righties. But they need more production from 1B/RF against righties as well. 
    • Yeah true, forgot about that. That does make the contract a lot worse. It was Duquette hail mary at the end of the offseason. But years and dollars-wise, it wasn't (or shouldn't have been) that big of a deal. The pick sucks, though, no question. 
    • Best case for 2025, I would love to see him towards the back of the bullpen again. He's imposing and relatively effective, especially if we see an uptick in stuff.  I long for the 2023 bullpen with Felix and Wells bringing some meanness out there. 
    • He's a good pitcher and he has options. I would definitely keep him. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...