Jump to content

Draft Signings


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, dabirds said:

I heard that too Frobby, but I think he misspoke.  He said Mclean and Showalter signed, but those are actually the ones who havent…

Yeah they made a couple of mistakes last night.  They also said that Texas, instead of Arizona, was going to be disappointed that Druw Jones was out for the year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dabirds said:

I heard that too Frobby, but I think he misspoke.  He said Mclean and Showalter signed, but those are actually the ones who havent…

There was an awkward Tweet that came out that listed the guys in a jpg below as signing then the guy listed the players who had not signed yet in the text. i thought they were signed too until I read closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Does it appear unlikely to get McLean, Showalter, Young and Walters all signed?

Very unlikely.  McLean and Showalter are likely unless they fail physicals.  In fact, I think the Young and Walter's picks were backup plans if Showalter failed his physical.  We'll see.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

Very unlikely.  McLean and Showalter are likely unless they fail physicals.  In fact, I think the Young and Walter's picks were backup plans if Showalter failed his physical.  We'll see.

I guess Showalter gets over $1 million then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

Very unlikely.  McLean and Showalter are likely unless they fail physicals.  In fact, I think the Young and Walter's picks were backup plans if Showalter failed his physical.  We'll see.

Assuming slot for McLean, they have about $1.6M to spend on Showalter, Walters and Young assuming they spend the full 5% overallotment and are willing to pay the ~$600k tax/penalty. I hope they go for it and try to get all three, but for $1.6M they should be able to get two of those guys at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, terpfan101 said:

Assuming slot for McLean, they have about $1.6M to spend on Showalter, Walters and Young assuming they spend the full 5% overallotment and are willing to pay the ~$600k tax/penalty. I hope they go for it and try to get all three, but for $1.6M they should be able to get two of those guys at least. 

I have no idea but I can guess that Young would require the most our of those 3.  I have a hard time believing that the price tag for all three is in the 500K range.  I'm guessing Showalter is an 800K minimum.   Maybe the same for Walters.  Young I think has the highest price tag.  Probably above 1M and around 1.5M.  Total guesses on my part.

The question is, did these players advisors tell the Orioles they were signable at a certain number before they were picked.  I'd have to guess yes on that one.  I think Showalter signs and maybe Walter. 

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

I have no idea but I can guess that Young would require the most our of those 3.  I have a hard time believing that the price tag for all three is in the 500K range.  I'm guessing Showalter is an 800K minimum.   Maybe the same for Walters.  Young I think has the highest price tag.  Probably above 1M and around 1.5M.  Total guesses on my part.

Wow. That seems like crazy money on Young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Wow. That seems like crazy money on Young.

At one point he was considered a potential top ten pick in the entire draft. I think he believes he can get back too 100% physically this offseason and be a first round pick next year.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any speculation on McLean?  Under/over slot?  

 

The 1.6 million should include the 125k for each that doesn't count against us.  So we should be able to spend 1.975 million amongst Showalter, Walters, and Young.  Spread out evenly, that's late 3rd round money.  If I had to choose only two it would be Young and Showalter.  That would be around 1 million a piece which is low 2nd rd money.  

 

Hopefully, we get McLean to take a haircut and bring in all three of those guys.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Very unlikely.  McLean and Showalter are likely unless they fail physicals.  In fact, I think the Young and Walter's picks were backup plans if Showalter failed his physical.  We'll see.

Agree that they wanted to have extra guys to throw money at, so they aren't left with extra slot money on the books or if someone fails a medical.  So, may as well have someone good queued up as plan B.

But why do you think they lean toward Showalter of the 3 after the 10th pick?  I would try to get him signed before any of the other 2 guys. 

To speculate some more:  Maybe Young was a true medical plan B (i.e. they had a ton of leftover money) so they never expected to sign him otherwise?    Maybe having Walter is team leverage in the negotiations with Young?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would guess with Holiday officially signed, the Showalter signing gets announced soon.  (Since you lose the bonus slot if you don't sign the player, they needed Holiday to officially sign, to have the leftover money to officially sign Showalter)

I think Young and Walters were two true flyers. If either or both sign, great...but if neither sign, that happens too 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Very unlikely.  McLean and Showalter are likely unless they fail physicals.  In fact, I think the Young and Walter's picks were backup plans if Showalter failed his physical.  We'll see.

I think they may be able to get 2 out of 3. I imagine the Orioles know their numbers. Once they can get Showalter under contract and he passes the physical, then they can take the rest and tell Walters and Young, first one that takes it gets it.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...