Jump to content

Can someone please explain what happened this season to the O's?


kidrock

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, emmett16 said:

https://www.si.com/mlb/2022/08/29/orioles-magic-secret-recipe
 

This kind of sums it up.   They have given up less walks & less home runs.  When they give up HRs there are fewer people on base.  When they don’t give up HRs the speed in the outfield and D up the middle catches the ball.  That plus a strong bullpen, the emergence of the Mountain as an unhittable closer, and Adley being Superman .  

great post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

25%.  

By the way, the Phillies’ offense also was down 260 runs in 1931 compared to 1930.   I looked to see if some structural changes were made to the Baker Bowl that year, but didn’t see anything.  
 

I think they messed with the ball.  The NL was significantly lower-scoring than the AL for most of the 1930s.  If I recall that correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The numbers make it clear that improved run prevention is what's driving the O's success.  So the question is, why has run prevention improved.

Surely improved defense at SS and C has helped.  We had some of the worst catcher defense I've ever seen last year.  This year, Rutschman is outstanding and Chirinos is at least decent.  Mateo is playing Gold-Glove caliber defense. 

I personally think that most of the credit has to go to the pitching staff and the analytics department.  An unusual number of guys have made dramatic improvements year over year--Dean Kremer, Spencer Watkins, Dillon Tate, Keegan Akin, and guys who came over on waivers like Cionel Perez and Austin Voth.   The front office seems to be able identify guys with potentially good stuff but poor results, and the staff is able to get them to focus on what they do well and to learn new pitches as needed.  Holt and Holmes need to get big raises over the offseason to deter poaching from other clubs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm kind of with you on this. Everything just feels like a crap shoot.  KC went and bought a bunch of 5th starters last offseason and might mess around and eliminate the top 2 AL East teams. 
    • With our second season of postseason futility behind us a number of posts have been made about the need for "players with postseason experience" to variously "calm, lead, guide, motivate," the younger players.  I've often suspected that this [postseason experience] is a much-overblown quality to guide our player acquisition efforts.  I realize the postseason, notably the World Series, is a mighty big stage on which to perform, but, between high school, college, and the minors, most of these players have played in some pretty big games under some significant pressure.   I finally ran across a data-driven article that set out to answer this question.  Published in 2002 in The Baseball Research Journal, Tom Hanrahan concludes it doesn't matter:   "Do baseball players fare better in the post-season when they have post-season experience behind them?  My research says the answer is a clear no.  Managers' efforts to build teams with players who 'have been there before' appear to be fruitless ventures, sacrificing money and possibly quality for no apparent gain.'"  What say you?  Is Hanrahan right?  Or is he all wet and the Orioles should go out and hire some wiley veterans who've "been there before" to get them over the hump?   https://sabr.org/journal/article/does-experience-help-in-the-postseason/#:~:text=Do baseball players fare better,quality for no apparent gain.
    • I disagree with your conclusion but I'm appropriating this line over the next couple of weeks:  "mega religious Lego playing softie white bread error machines."   🤣
    • What is crazy is that Soto won't be 26 for another couple of weeks.  Guy has been an absolute force on offense for 7 seasons already and he is almost a year younger than Adley.  There is always risk tied to the back end of big contracts, but I would hate to constantly pass on players like this just because we are always afraid of the next Chris Davis (who really fell off the cliff in his age 32 season).  I don't think we will be in play for a Soto type player anyhow, and I certainly understand that management has to focus on finances and the budgets. But as a fan, all I care about is winning games and October success. Whether the Os have a payroll of $50 million, $150 million, or $500 million, I really don't care as long as they bring a championship to Baltimore.  Flags fly forever.  
    • Is Britt the only good MLB journo at this point? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...