Jump to content

What will Cedric Mullins be in 2023?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

There’s still a lot of unknowns with Cedric Mullins going into 2023.  

Through 2020, Mullins was a .225/.290/.342 hitter, who finished 2020 strong.  He had a crazy number of bunt hits that year that left people wondering if his strong finish was sustainable once third baseman started crowding him.   He was also extremely weak against LHP, .440 OPS for his career.

In 2021, Mullins scrapped switch hitting, batting exclusively from the left side.  He started that season on fire, posting a  .314/.380/.541 line through the all star break.  For a long time, he was hitting LHP even better than RHP that year.  But he cooled off after the break, posting a .261/.333/.489 line in the second half.  He ended that year at .931 vs. RHP, .788 vs. LHP.

The 2022 version of Mullins was sort of a mix of the pre-2021 version and the 2021 version.  He hit .258/.318/.403, which included a solid .782 vs. RHP but .579 vs. LHP.  His HR/FB rate went from 12.2% in 2021 to 6.9% in 2022.   Towards the end of the year, Brandon Hyde was sliding Mullins towards the bottom of the order vs. LHP.

So what do we think Mullins will be in 2023?   The 2021 version, the 2022 version, something in between?  Something worse than 2022?

Personally, I think 2022 is probably the truest version of Mullins.   I think 2023 will be similar, but we might see Mullins sit a bit more often vs. LHP.   Last year he started 35 of 50 games vs. a LH starter.  This year I think he might start half the time or less vs. a LH starter.


 


 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think going into 2023 Mullins has to be thought of as a platoon player vs right-handed pitching who he went 279/340/441/782 against in 2022 and a defensive player to finish out games when the O's are ahead.

The O's need to pair him with a good CFer that can hit lefties.   McKenna hit  270/333/460/793 vs lefties last year.  It could be him or some one better.

The only way I would trade Mullins is if the O's have some one better ready to be the O's CF to begins 2023.   I think that is unlikely especially when he can steal 35 bases.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he’ll have to adjust to being pitched up and in, especially by LHP. He has a hole up there. He did better when he stopped trying to muscle up and pull the ball as much. The lack of a shift should help him some as well. It appeared to me that he also moved in on the plate and dared pitchers to come inside. Maybe he became too pull conscious to try to get back to 30 HR’s again. He got HBP nine times vs. eight in 2021. It seemed like he was constantly getting knocked down or brushed back. 

As to who he is going forward, I think he’ll be better than his 2022 numbers. I think he hangs in well against LHP’s and uses the whole field better than he used to. He’s not a 30 HR guy, and probably not even a consistent 20 HR guy. I would be disappointed if he has to platoon, but I do think he can play about 125-130 games or so, giving him a rest twice a week. Keep him as healthy as possible, maybe DH now and then. 

If he’s .270/.350/.410/.760, that’s a good player to me. I think he is capable of that. With his work ethic, I believe in him and his ability to reach that level. I think he found out some things about himself in 2022. With his health concerns in check, apparently, I look for better numbers than 2022. I don’t see another Silver Slugger coming, though.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect him to play a bit less and to regress a little more at the plate.   If we can really trade him to the Marlins as has been rumored, I'd jump on it.   He was incredible in 2021, and I never expect to see that from him again.   He was just good last year, and I think the next few years will fluctuate between good and above average.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, forphase1 said:

I expect him to play a bit less and to regress a little more at the plate.   If we can really trade him to the Marlins as has been rumored, I'd jump on it.   He was incredible in 2021, and I never expect to see that from him again.   He was just good last year, and I think the next few years will fluctuate between good and above average.  

Curious about "rumors," which imply "leaks," which we seem pretty sure aren't available at least to our "insiders." There was the purely speculative piece in MLB.com in the MAD Magazine style of "Trades We'd Like to See," but I would clarify that's not a rumor just an exercise. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Baltimore and DC surrounding population around 9 million. NYC around 24 million.
    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...