Jump to content

BRob potential deals to the Cubs


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

What can we get from the Cubs?

Let's assume, for the purpose of this thread, that the Cubs can not get Peavy and turn their attention back to Roberts, which I think is possible.

What would you want to get from them to make a deal happen?

Does Vitters have to be included?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 270
  • Created
  • Last Reply
What can we get from the Cubs?

Let's assume, for the purpose of this thread, that the Cubs can not get Peavy and turn their attention back to Roberts, which I think is possible.

What would you want to get from them to make a deal happen?

Does Vitters have to be included?

I think Vitters has to be included. Their pantry is getting kinda bare. I would also assume Pie gets thrown in for good measure. His value seems to have crashed. Wouldnt mind putting Pie in left field or center and just letting it all play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Fontenot will be the Cubs 2B and he is not much worse than Roberts. He is also cheaper, which also works for the Cubs. I do not see a deal with them.

I don't buy for a second that Lou is excited about Fontenot, especially if they can get BRob.

Now, if they can get Peavy, they would prefer that.

BTW, you could have said the same thing last year and the Cubs also had DeRosa, so obviously it doesn't matter that much to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't buy for a second that Lou is excited about Fontenot, especially if they can get BRob.

Now, if they can get Peavy, they would prefer that.

BTW, you could have said the same thing last year and the Cubs also had DeRosa, so obviously it doesn't matter that much to them.

I don't know much about Fontenot, but I cannot imagine him being as big of a threat on the basepaths as Roberts. Roberts brings more to the table than just his defense and pretty good bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Craw that there is no longer a clear fit. If BAL was to trade Roberts to CHN, I don't think Vitters would be included, nor should he be required. One year of Roberts is not worth a top 30 prospect in all of baseball, in my opinion. If BAL can get him, great, but I don't imagine they could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't buy for a second that Lou is excited about Fontenot, especially if they can get BRob.

Now, if they can get Peavy, they would prefer that.

BTW, you could have said the same thing last year and the Cubs also had DeRosa, so obviously it doesn't matter that much to them.

Lou may not be happy about it, but everyone projects Fontenot to be better than DeRosa. Securing him at second along with a few other moves allowed them to nab Bradley.

Now, the difference between this year and last is that cost was less of a concern last year. Roberts was a small but sizable improvement over DeRosa, but cost was not a factor. Or, at least not much of a factor. This year, as having been laboriously articulated in the Tribune, cost is a factor. Therefore, I would be surprised to see the Cubs nab Roberts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...but cost was not a factor. Or, at least not much of a factor. This year, as having been laboriously articulated in the Tribune, cost is a factor. Therefore, I would be surprised to see the Cubs nab Roberts.

I'm not sure about the rest of the argument, but that portion strikes me as true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...