Jump to content

Fangraphs top 100


Frobby

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

So many factors to determine that. Mayo isn’t untouchable but there are a lot of guys you trade before him unless you are really starting to doubt his game.

Trading out of the depth you have is the first place you should be looking to trade.

I agree.  I’m just thinking like an outside org.  Of course I’d like to trade from depth.  But if I’m looking at the Os top 10, knowing there are a couple untouchables, he’s the first guy that would interest me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I don't see the O's trading anyone right now.   Maybe at the trade deadline they trade Gibson, Frazier and maybe Santander depending  on how the O's young players are progressing.   But its too soon to know that.

They are getting to a point where the 40 man will start being an issue. I took a quick glance at who needs to be protected by December. 
 

When the rebuild started there was a ton of players who were lucky to be on a 40. I recall the Britton trade where NYY dealt away a bunch of players - including Tate- who were going to be needed to be protected. I haven’t analyzed it that close but they may be at a point where they can package some of the excess for a piece or two late in the year. Maybe a bench bat or bullpen arm. Obviously they need premium talent to get a top shelf arm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

Servideo isn’t even on the radar of being added. I think Haskin is dealt between now and next offseason.

My point is those are the type of players to be dealt at the deadline. Not implying Servideo is up and coming. There is much less dead weight around here. 
 

Makes sense to move those guys and see what you can get. Not saying once again it’s for impactful talent. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

My point is those are the type of players to be dealt at the deadline. Not implying Servideo is up and coming. There is much less dead weight around here. 
 

Makes sense to move those guys and see what you can get. Not saying once again it’s for impactful talent. 

I still think we have a lot of dead weight on the 40 man.

That said, this is what I have been talking about for a while. At some point, you are going to start losing decent players for nothing. That was part of the reason the Hernaiz trade was so good.

You have to move pieces before they have zero value. You can’t just assume everyone ends up good.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I still we have a lot of dead weight on the 40 man.

That said, this is what I have been talking about for a while. At some point, you are going to start losing decent players for nothing. That was part of the reason the Hernaiz trade was so good.

You have to move pieces before they have zero value. You can’t just assume everyone ends up good.

My guess is we keep seeing moves Iike Bemboom and O’Hearn. They effectively are buying extra 40 man spots. The players if released have to be willing to give up their guaranteed salary to become a FA and if claimed then the money is of the books anyway. No need to keep 3 catchers on the 40. Plenty of infield depth around here already but maybe they do it with an OF type. Arms I think would be different. 
 

I would certainly expect to see a decent number of deals this year. Hopefully it will be for the benefit of the 23 club. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Oriole1940 said:

Because

it is the Orioles.  Too risky for some.  Were it the Yankees, G Rod would be compared t0 the 2nd Coming.   

I'm not sure if you're being facetious or not, but FanGraphs doesn't really work like that; they are ruthlessly analytical, perhaps to a fault. There are 6 Orioles on their top-100 compared to 3 Yankees, with two Orioles ranked higher than the top Yankee prospect. I'm really not seeing the NYY bias there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was scrolling through the FG Top 100 chat and found this:

jd: Are you able to identify organizations that regularly over-perform when it comes to development, and those that underperform? Meaning, taking unknown talent and making 50+ guys, or taking good draft choices and turning them into sub-35s.

 

 
1:18
Eric A Longenhagen: I think so, and it creates a problem where I’m predicting vs scouting. CLE, LAD, NYY (arms, catchers), ARI (i’m starting to believe), SEA (arms)…

 

 
1:19
Eric A Longenhagen: Dev is a huge deal and it’s part of why dollars have shifted from scouting to dev

 

 

Obviously, I was hoping he'd include BAL but alas... 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, emmett16 said:

He is also one of the most volatile.  If they are truly in 'win now' mode they will need to make some trades. 

I'm convinced they're only mildly in "win now" mode. I don't see them giving up guys who project as cornerstones unless it's for a cornerstone return. Given the win now mode question, that's why I don't think it's "likely" that Mayo gets traded.

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

As a secondary piece right? 

You don't think Mayo headlines a deal for a "stud SP" right?

 

I think Mayo has to be a headliner (or co-headliner with a Cowser type) at this point from the O's perspective, but I doubt other teams look at him like that quite yet. That could start to change with a little spring training hype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Very weak.  OTOH, there's still a possibility that Jackson Merrill won't win in the NL.  Who didn't want Cowser to have had that rookie season?
    • Who’d a thunk it? There’s a chance? Almost like it’s a long season. Now if only that Mayo guy would do something.
    • Jeez, it really was a welcome game tonight.  I had a good buzz going...   Now I have to factor in your chronic angst.  Thanks man.
    • If we enter the Yankees series down by three games, we have a mathematical chance. However, we are going to have to intentionally walk Judge and Soto every single AB. The athletics did us no favors tonight.  Still four games out..
    • I know. I'm a hand wringer and a whiner when it comes to this team. I sometimes annoy myself with all this baseball nonsense. But really deep down,I'm still the 8 year old who lived and died with every Oriole game. Still. Im that kid. So when this team was really horrible like for most of the second half, it almost made me nauseous just to watch them lose in all kinds of ways. Then all those injuries in a wave. I really felt they weren't going to make the postseason at all. But baseball is a crazy game, and a light switch can be turned on in an instant. Maybe that Santander walk off HR on Thursday threw a switch. Because Friday night, this was a different team. They still strike out a lot, and Burnes was brilliant, but I feel maybe something is moving. Seeing Coluombe come in and strike two batters out, and Webb, not as good, but good enough with a big lead...and to see Cowser and McCann blast two, and Tony again with a HR...It got my juices flowing. Look, maybe they wont play well this weekend, maybe they will. And then the dreaded Yankees might break our hearts next week.But why think that way now.?Urias is coming, then Westburg, then maybe Mounty, and even possibly Grayson at the end . If we can somehow put the pieces together and get our mojo back, and have the players contribute, we maybe, just maybe, might have a little ray of hope.I still think this roster is talented when all our pieces are together, and as good as anyone when we are playing well. So, I'm not asking for a miracle. I'm just asking for a chance to see this team with most of the pieces together again, and compete.Maybe it's even a long shot, but I am still that 8 year old living and dying for a chance to see my boys make me proud. And these are my boys.
    • Velocity was 1.5-2mph down across the board. Movement was good, especially the sweeper. The fastballs worry me at that velocity though... not sure he should be immediately high leverage in the way he used to be.
    • Nicely done. Lol. Yes I remember that with Minnesota. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...