Jump to content

Austin Hays 2023


Frobby

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, amdcpus said:

Austin Hays is now leading the AL in batting average, at .320, putting him ahead of Bo Bichette who is batting .318.

Is he a consistent .300 hitter?

 

looking at his numbers from both host time in the majors and minors it seems he hasn’t been a high average hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, casadeozo said:

Is he a consistent .300 hitter?

 

looking at his numbers from both host time in the majors and minors it seems he hasn’t been a high average hitter.

As a big fan of Hays, I will say no he isn't a "consistent" 300 hitter imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pickles said:

As a big fan of Hays, I will say no he isn't a "consistent" 300 hitter imo.

Not to this point in his career.   But he’s been pretty consistent this year.  Hopefully he can keep it up.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hays continues to be locked in. He doesn't always get the greatest AB's but he almost always gets a good pitch to hit and makes hard contact. It seems He is benefitting as much as anyone from the "swing decisions" philosophy. He hasn't gone hitless two games in a row so far in June. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Not to this point in his career.   But he’s been pretty consistent this year.  Hopefully he can keep it up.  

It's hard to knock his performance so far this year in any way.  And he damn well might hot .300 this year though I'd still take the under.

But I consider a "consistent " .300 hitter to be a guy who hits .300 every year. I don't believe he has that skillet.

It's an incredibly rare skill set. Even a guy I consider to be one, Paul Molitor, with a .306 career average, had many, many years under .300. I had to look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the MLB Network they did a bit with Cliff Floyd asking him if he would be alright with being a .180ish hitter who hits 40-50 bombs with 120 RBI. Initially he said he wouldn’t be but then retracted when they threw out the point that in the hypothetical the organization approached him to be THAT type of hitter.
 

I firmly believe that an Org’s hitting philosophy can largely dictate the performance of players. Coming up through the minors (especially when Hays graduated to elite prospect status) I think he was asked (and expected to be) a MOO bat who would hit 30+ homers. I think we are seeing a healthy Austin Hays adjust not only to who he is as a player but also what the team needs from him. They don’t need Austin Hays to hit 30-40 homeruns. They need Austin Hays to hit. Period. 
 

I think he’s capable .300 seasons if he is THIS version of Austin Hays. To me he looks better not being in the middle of the order. Let him be this version while playing outstanding outfield defense, which I think gets better with a move to RF where his arm is more important. 
 

Willhe hit .300? None of us can answer that. But I think he CAN. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, banks703 said:

On the MLB Network they did a bit with Cliff Floyd asking him if he would be alright with being a .180ish hitter who hits 40-50 bombs with 120 RBI. Initially he said he wouldn’t be but then retracted when they threw out the point that in the hypothetical the organization approached him to be THAT type of hitter.
 

I firmly believe that an Org’s hitting philosophy can largely dictate the performance of players. Coming up through the minors (especially when Hays graduated to elite prospect status) I think he was asked (and expected to be) a MOO bat who would hit 30+ homers. I think we are seeing a healthy Austin Hays adjust not only to who he is as a player but also what the team needs from him. They don’t need Austin Hays to hit 30-40 homeruns. They need Austin Hays to hit. Period. 
 

I think he’s capable .300 seasons if he is THIS version of Austin Hays. To me he looks better not being in the middle of the order. Let him be this version while playing outstanding outfield defense, which I think gets better with a move to RF where his arm is more important. 
 

Willhe hit .300? None of us can answer that. But I think he CAN. 

Can you explain why, in this scenario, his OBP is only 40 points higher than his batting average?  That's actually lower than his career numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pickles said:

It's hard to knock his performance so far this year in any way.  And he damn well might hot .300 this year though I'd still take the under.

But I consider a "consistent " .300 hitter to be a guy who hits .300 every year. I don't believe he has that skillet.

It's an incredibly rare skill set. Even a guy I consider to be one, Paul Molitor, with a .306 career average, had many, many years under .300. I had to look.

And even rarer these days. 

Last year 11 qualifying hitters managed .300+. Looking at five year increments, in 2017-2012-2007-2002, the number of qualifying hitters at .300 was 25-25-40-35. 

The rise of the strikeout has meant the demise of the .300 hitter. Fifteen years ago the 40th best average hitter was Nick Markakis and a couple other guys at .300 even. Last year the 40th best average hitter was Pete Alonso and a couple other guys at .271. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

And even rarer these days. 

Last year 11 qualifying hitters managed .300+. Looking at five year increments, in 2017-2012-2007-2002, the number of qualifying hitters at .300 was 25-25-40-35. 

The rise of the strikeout has meant the demise of the .300 hitter. Fifteen years ago the 40th best average hitter was Nick Markakis and a couple other guys at .300 even. Last year the 40th best average hitter was Pete Alonso and a couple other guys at .271. 

The shift didn't help either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...