Jump to content

McCann activated Stowers optioned


Pat Kelly

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I read it as they are not sure McCann is 100% healthy.

Which, if true, should lead to McCann having a rehab stint.

Is this a respect the vet thing?

McCann had a rehab stint.  Two games with Aberdeen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having Stowers on the roster to sit on the bench makes no sense. He needs ABs.

McKenna and Benboom don’t need at bats. If they sit on the bench 5/6 days it’s fine. My guess is Benboom gets sent through waivers though as soon as the Oakland series is over, and they want another left handed bat. 
 

Since they seem to want a left handed first basemen, and they don’t trust stowers to play of, I wonder if he gets 1b work at Norfolk 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, seak05 said:

Having Stowers on the roster to sit on the bench makes no sense. He needs ABs.

McKenna and Benboom don’t need at bats. If they sit on the bench 5/6 days it’s fine. My guess is Benboom gets sent through waivers though as soon as the Oakland series is over, and they want another left handed bat. 
 

Since they seem to want a left handed first basemen, and they don’t trust stowers to play of, I wonder if he gets 1b work at Norfolk 

Why wouldn’t they have done that in the off-season or in spring training?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, seak05 said:

Having Stowers on the roster to sit on the bench makes no sense. He needs ABs.

McKenna and Benboom don’t need at bats. If they sit on the bench 5/6 days it’s fine. My guess is Benboom gets sent through waivers though as soon as the Oakland series is over, and they want another left handed bat. 
 

Since they seem to want a left handed first basemen, and they don’t trust stowers to play of, I wonder if he gets 1b work at Norfolk 

More likely, you’ll see Lester or O’Hearn get the next call.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why?

Other than to soothe his ego why?

I know folks here have this weird Mountcastle bias thing going on but why?

Also, this is Bemboom's BBref page.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/bemboan01.shtml

He doesn't need to be on the roster.

Not disagreeing but Hyde has mentioned him at first base 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

What happens in 4 days? 

They face a right handed starting pitcher. The next 4 games are all being started by lefties, which is why having a third catcher on the roster makes some small amount of sense for a few games. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Remember when people said there was no way they were going to play McCann 60-80 games and that wasn’t the actual plan?  
 

It’s clear by this move and justification for it that they are absolutely fine with that plan. 
 

So stupid.

How so?   This move says nothing about McCanns playing time.  Bemboom is the emergency 3rd catcher.  It says more about using Rutschman at DH and 1B.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...