Jump to content

Im pretty sure Im in the minority on this board but its my opinion


Roy Firestone

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

We have a winner!

Now, take this a step further and really apply this to baseball. It brings eyeballs to the sport and, even more importantly, younger eye balls.

When you embrace the gambling and you bring in new rules that increases the pace of play, you get more viewers and more long term viewers.

This is all very important and really, your own personal feelings about it mean far less than growing the game and making it appealing to the younger generation.

Baseball has a marketing problem. It has an age problem. This may be something that can fix that..or at least help fix it.

I think that 95% of it is immediate paychecks and 5% is how it might grow the sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, blid said:

This is all well and good until you have a massive scandal that demolishes the integrity of the sport.  It's only a matter of time.

Why? It’s not like you weren’t allowed to bet before. There have already been scandals across sports.

That said, the leagues are willing to risk this and they are right for doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

We have a winner!

Now, take this a step further and really apply this to baseball. It brings eyeballs to the sport and, even more importantly, younger eye balls.

When you embrace the gambling and you bring in new rules that increases the pace of play, you get more viewers and more long term viewers.

This is all very important and really, your own personal feelings about it mean far less than growing the game and making it appealing to the younger generation.

Baseball has a marketing problem. It has an age problem. This may be something that can fix that..or at least help fix it.

I don't disagree with any of it.  I'm a capitalist too, a business owner...I like making money.  

It's important to make money and to advance the sport.  But to ignore the other issues that surround gambling because baseball has a marketing problem and a problem with attracting young fans is selective ignorance.  Mind you, I just hate the gambling stuff because I find their ads to be tacky and predatory and I know it's not going anywhere, but I also can't ignore the other issues that can crop up.  

There are no solutions for problems, there's only tradeoffs.  And so if one of the tradeoffs to trying attract viewership and younger fans is bringing along problems that are associated with gambling, those need to be examined, too.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't disagree with any of it.  I'm a capitalist too, a business owner...I like making money.  

It's important to make money and to advance the sport.  But to ignore the other issues that surround gambling because baseball has a marketing problem and a problem with attracting young fans is selective ignorance.  Mind you, I just hate the gambling stuff because I find their ads to be tacky and predatory and I know it's not going anywhere, but I also can't ignore the other issues that can crop up.  

There are no solutions for problems, there's only tradeoffs.  And so if one of the tradeoffs to trying attract viewership and younger fans is bringing along problems that are associated with gambling, those need to be examined, too.

I don’t think people are ignoring potential issues..they just don’t care about them as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Why? It’s not like you weren’t allowed to bet before. There have already been scandals across sports.

That said, the leagues are willing to risk this and they are right for doing so.

Why?  It's happened before and it's always been a risk that it would happen again.  That's why MLB took such a hard stance against the Black Sox and then Pete Rose.  The massive proliferation of gambling is only going to compound the pressures that lead to this sort of thing, making it basically inevitable.

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I know MLB is held to a higher standard than other sports but still....

Tim Donaghy is proof that yes this can and does still happen.  Yes, it's actually pretty incredible how well the NBA swept that under the rug, since it likely was more widespread than just Donaghy, but I don't think any league could get away with something like that today with all the social media and general societal distrust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, blid said:

Why?  It's happened before and it's always been a risk that it would happen again.  That's why MLB took such a hard stance against the Black Sox and then Pete Rose.  The massive proliferation of gambling is only going to compound the pressures that lead to this sort of thing, making it basically inevitable.

Tim Donaghy is proof that yes this can and does still happen.  Yes, it's actually pretty incredible how well the NBA swept that under the rug, since it likely was more widespread than just Donaghy, but I don't think any league could get away with something like that today with all the social media and general societal distrust.

MLB took those stances because they happened within the sport.

MLB isn’t risking more of that, within the sport, by doing this. This is all for the fans. The players can bet on games if they choose whether or not MLB advertises for it.

It would happen either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, blid said:

 

Tim Donaghy is proof that yes this can and does still happen.  Yes, it's actually pretty incredible how well the NBA swept that under the rug, since it likely was more widespread than just Donaghy, but I don't think any league could get away with something like that today with all the social media and general societal distrust.

I think our collective attention span is even shorter and we are even more jaded as a society.  If anything I think it would be easier to recover from.

Except of course Baseball is held to a weirdly higher standard and that might come into play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe... I don't know though.   I see your point but if you don't trust the outcomes of games anymore to be legitimate you might quit watching.  People love to righteously boycott things now.

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

MLB took those stances because they happened within the sport.

MLB isn’t risking more of that, within the sport, by doing this. This is all for the fans. The players can bet on games if they choose whether or not MLB advertises for it.

It would happen either way.

Players, managers, umpires all live in the same world we do. They are increasingly likely to have been exposed to gambling in their lives which will leak into the game.

Edited by blid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

MLB took those stances because they happened within the sport.

MLB isn’t risking more of that, within the sport, by doing this. This is all for the fans. The players can bet on games if they choose whether or not MLB advertises for it.

It would happen either way.

It's not for the fans.

It's for the owners.

If the owners could make more money selling Penis Pills they would.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t think people are ignoring potential issues..they just don’t care about them as much.

Lol, SG, your stance for gambling is pretty much, like , "This is great, it's bringing viewership and attention to the sport, I don't care about anyone's problems, they're not my problems and if you have a gambling problem, I don't feel sorry for you, you should have known to not gamble."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Lol, SG, your stance for gambling is pretty much, like , "This is great, it's bringing viewership and attention to the sport, I don't care about anyone's problems, they're not my problems and if you have a gambling problem, I don't feel sorry for you, you should have known to not gamble."

I feel that way but I don't feel that way about the guy with a gambling problem children.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Lol, SG, your stance for gambling is pretty much, like , "This is great, it's bringing viewership and attention to the sport, I don't care about anyone's problems, they're not my problems and if you have a gambling problem, I don't feel sorry for you, you should have known to not gamble."

Well all of this is true. 
 

But growing the game and bringing in younger viewers is more important than potential gambling issues for individual degenerates.

Everything that a league, a company or an individual does has pluses and minuses. This is all about weighing the pluses and minuses and the league feels the pluses outweigh the minuses and I agree with them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's not for the fans.

It's for the owners.

If the owners could make more money selling Penis Pills they would.

Sure..but the fans love to gamble. They love fantasy sports. 
 

On this board, we love baseball. Nationwide, people don’t care about baseball. There is a reason that talk about the NFL draft is 80% of sports shows and they quickly go through baseball highlights.

Baseball is trying to change that and embracing this helps with that.

Of course the end game is making money. That’s obvious and doesn’t need  to be said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cowser’s  swing decisions are determined before the pitch is even thrown. And I’ve been saying this all year, and I even said this at the game. I go it’s too early to pinch it for him because his defense is too good but he is 100% going to strike out and that’s exactly what he did with bases loaded. He decides whether he is going to swing a pitch before even thrown This is why he swings at a thrown pretty close to his face . And To be fair,he  had a pretty good season doing that but obviously can be  easily exploited
    • Cowser's progress was one of the more encouraging elements this season, especially on the defensive side. I was already crediting him with being Some Kind of Good major leaguer a post back. Between his and Adley's standout bad performances on the HBP and 2-0 count, I give Cowser more of a grace.     Sure he had predetermined intent to swing, but I think the follow through was some raw instinct as hand bones fractured. Adley not swinging was the lowlight how incapacitated he was.    I believe he commands the strike zone, but to feel so low you can't pull the trigger in that spot...sheesh.
    • I believe Elias plans to bring in two more SP's, the quality isnt what im sure about. But no question he'll want to replace Burnes. Which is why I didnt comment in this thread yet because Povich might not have a spot open at the beginning of the year. 
    • So a “Pollyanna” then like me, @wildcard and others (joking of course) 😇 I’m in your camp but really wonder if Elias/Hyde and Co. can truly“flip the script” as @Just Regular alludes.
    • So thats because the extra space in the OF allows for more balls to fall in? If so, I don't really see an issue if its providing offense in a different way. 
    • I'm neutral on it. I don't like how the old dimensions played like a wiffle ball field. Both teams have to play on it and the O's do have two good OF's so in that sense it helps us. RHH will probably hate it so very few would ever sign in Baltimore unless they thought the O's were in World Series contention. If they put it in the middle ground then the dimensions become like every other park and Im not sure I want that. At least Camden Yards plays different. 
    • I agree with this.  It was a completely idiotic take to criticize the fans.  And Russo on MLB Network did as well.  Did those guys watch this team at all this year? They were under .500 for the last 88 games of the season.....the worst team in the AL East.  These were the home series they played over the last three months: Chicago Cubs (swept and outscored 21-2), Yankees (lost 2 of 3 and needed two Yankee errors to walk off the last one), San Diego (lost 2 of 3), Toronto (won 3 of 4), Washington (split 1 of 2), Boston (split 2 of 4), Houston (split 2 of 4), White Sox (won 2 of 3 but lost last one 8-1), Tampa (lost 2 of 3), San Fran (lost 2 of 3), Detroit (lost 2 of 3). What is that, 15 - 20 in their last 35 home games?  And then they top it off by losing to the Royals 1 - 0 in the first game?  So fans are supposed to be excited and encouraged by that stretch of baseball?   You want people to show up to games, play like the Padres. Don't have your prized prospects go bust, don't have your stars fall off a cliff, and learn how to play fundamental baseball instead of obsessing about each swing's potential exit velocity.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...