Jump to content

Friday May 19: Orioles at Blue Jays, televised exclusively on Apple+ TV


SteveA

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

For some reason the second guessing Hyde thread wanted Irvin to close as if nothing bad can happen with a four run lead and your worst pitcher.

Because if you don't trust a ML pitcher to get 3 outs with a 4 run lead, they shouldn't be on a major league roster. 

But now you've upped the possibility that instead of having Voth (or Irvin) out there with a 4 run lead, they're out there with a 1 run lead....like literally just happened yesterday 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

Correct call to bring in Felix here IMO. No screwing around with this game. Hyde tried Voth with a four run lead the other night and wound up having to go the Mountain anyway. 

A top reliever can pitch a limited number of games. You can't have him pitch every time you'd like to. Is this a game in which you should use both Cano and Bautista (in different situations, given the Frazier HR)? I don't think it is, and I don't really understand the argument on the other side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

100%. Bad call. We should have guys who can get 3 outs before 4 runs are given up. It’s almost like Hyde is living game to game. 

I thought Gibson had the mojo working.  He should have gone out for 8th and then have someone to finish off that wasn't Cano/Bautista.   Think the game sped up on Hyde a little bit.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

Seem like a perfect time to sit Bautista and not use him. Not a fan of using the closer with a 4-run lead.

I saw he was warming in the 8th before the Frazier HR. Warming him up and then not using him doesn’t really make much sense either does it? 
 

He doesn’t look like he has much command tonight regardless 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

For some reason the second guessing Hyde thread wanted Irvin to close as if nothing bad can happen with a four run lead and your worst pitcher.

If Irvin can’t pitch one inning without giving up 4 runs then why is he on the team?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, spiritof66 said:

A top reliever can pitch a limited number of games. You can't have him pitch every time you'd like to. Is this a game in which you should use both Cano and Bautista (in different situations, given the Frazier HR)? I don't think it is, and I don't really understand the argument on the other side.

I agree with this. I can only think Bautista was already warmed up before the Frazier homer? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • WBALs Blair Young likes our chances https://www.wbaltv.com/article/do-orioles-have-chance-sign-free-agent-pitcher-corbin-burnes/62512129
    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...