Jump to content

Wednesday June 7: O's at Brewers trying to even the Series


FlaO'sFan

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Alasdaire said:

I can't back this up with statistics since I'm not sure they exist, but the variance with our runs scored feels high. There are many games like this one where they go long stretches without doing anything.

I would not trust this lineup in the playoffs. In which case, why would we upgrade the starting pitching mid-season by offloading the only assets we have as an organization?

https://stathead.com/baseball/inning_summary.cgi?year=2023&team_id=BAL&utm_medium=sr_xsite&utm_source=br&utm_campaign=2023_01_team_scoring_stathead&utm_id=BAL

image.thumb.png.e1f4fed8da453645f6df2f1002b954c6.png

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dtk9119 said:

How many more games are we gonna use that excuse? If this is a playoff team they are going to have to figure out some of these top starters.

Does it count when we beat Logan Webb, or Max Fried, or Zach Eflin, or Chris Sale, or scored 5 off Cole, or scored 7 off Bieber, or scored 7 off Sale another time? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dtk9119 said:

Exactly. Look at what the Giants did. Yes it was due to injury but most of this lineup might as well be injured. 

The part that frustrates me is that there's nothing to learn about most of these guys. They're not going to be on true contending teams. And they don't even have any history with the franchise that earns them the benefit of the doubt.

So for the sake of "winning now" with Aaron Hicks, we're losing out on the chance to learn about whether guys like Kyle Stowers, let alone Jordan Westburg/Joey Ortiz, have it in them to contribute when it really matters next year and beyond.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alasdaire said:

The part that frustrates me is that there's nothing to learn about most of these guys. They're not going to be on true contending teams. And they don't even have any history with the franchise that earns them the benefit of the doubt.

So for the sake of "winning now" with Aaron Hicks, we're losing out on the chance to learn about whether guys like Kyle Stowers, let alone Jordan Westburg/Joey Ortiz, have it in them to contribute when it really matters next year and beyond.

Stowers failed horribly when he had his chance. He's an automatic out.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

Does it count when we beat Logan Webb, or Max Fried, or Zach Eflin, or Chris Sale, or scored 5 off Cole, or scored 7 off Bieber, or scored 7 off Sale another time? 

Blanked vs Cobb and Burnes. And did virtually nothing vs Strider. We could play this game all night. 

Meanwhile,  time for Zimmerman to shuttle on back to Norfolk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, oriolediehard said:

Stowers failed horribly when he had his chance. He's an automatic out.

So he just doesn't get a chance beyond ~100 at bats? I think Stowers was a bit overrated by most people here. If he had been drafted in 2022, he would get a bit lost in the shuffle.

But if not now, when would be an appropriate time to evaluate what you have with him? He's not an organizational guy, so he does deserve a shot.

If the front office feels pressed to win now to the point that they can't find at bats for prospects because they think they're going to have a rough time adjusting, then they must be planning on trading all of them, because the pressure to win is going to be amplified going forward.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm shocked they gave him 121 at bats over two seasons.

 

 

I don't think he's going to be a quality ML player but come on, 121 at bats?

Stowers 30 at bats this season equates to just over a one week slump for an established starting player.

I don't think he's going to develop into anything either, but he hasn't been given a fair shake yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We may have the see  the best version of this team in April and June.   Os have a better record than the Brewers but haven’t had an easy win like this all year.  Not dominating but wining a bunch of tight games.  Team looks worn out. If Elias refuses to call up better players is he still tanking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Clearly he has a roster spot for a playoff series with the Yankees….
    • My stance would be pretty simple. Im not trading any of the top 3 prospects and im not trading any of the young talent that is controlled long term that is currently on the ML roster. That means besides the very obvious guys that players like Cowser and Kjerstad are also off the board. Now, if a player like Skubal becomes available, that could cause me to change my mind but as I look around at the reported available players, I don’t see anyone worth a top 20 prospect or young contributing ML talent. Guys like Norby and Stowers fall into that latter category but they aren’t here right now and they are just redundant on our roster. So I’m telling teams if you want to deal with us, guys like Norby, Stowers and Beavers are who will lead deals and that several vets, led by Mountcastle, are also on the board in any potential contender/contender(fringe contender) type deal. I think whether it’s Fedde or relievers like Estevez or Nardi or Garcia or even Scott, I think we have enough to get deals done without trading any of the guys we would rather not lose. This is all to say that I just don’t see that proven elite high end talent available this deadline to justify trading any of those top guys.
    • He’s an interesting test case. Prior to 2023, wasn’t good. In 2023, he threw around 200 innings iirc in the KBO and learned the sweeper. Now he is pitching much better. His statcast stats are pretty good although he’s not missing bats or getting Ks and he has a tendency to give up some hard contact.  
    • I don’t think he can be counted on for that. If you can get him cheap fine but his career WAR is 3.5 and he has 3.7 this year. Plus he’s 33 innings short of his career high …did 120-130 range twice. How could that be your acquisition that can be counted on when he could quite possibly run out of gas? Or get to a team where performance matters and feel the pressure versus pitching for the White Sox…A horrid team that everyone knew was going to suck.
    • Yea but how are you defining that?  Is Fedde a #3 or better, for example?
    • With all due respect … I think you are counting on Mayo to come up and immediately perform. I don’t think it’s realistic… possible yes. But, most guys have an adjustment. If it’s one thing we’ve seen from Hyde is the reluctance to give regular time to the rookies. Didn’t see it with Stowers, Norby, etc. They did  give it to Holliday but I think there was pressure being put on him to do so.  You think he would replace Urias who doesn’t play everyday with Mayo and sit the other guys to play him every day which is what a player needs during that adjustment period? 
    • Roch retweeted this. Lots of fans are speculating that it means Watkins is coming back to the Os. It makes some sense as we need fresh arms.  His numbers aren’t great this year but not sure that is going to matter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...