Jump to content

Kolozsvary out, Ortiz back


interloper

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

I think the only reason Ortiz is here over Westburg is that he is on the 40 man roster. If that was reversed, I bet Westburg would be coming up

Bold prediction: Player who is not on the 40 man roster can’t  be promoted to the majors. 🤣🤣 I jest, I jest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bublooo said:

Westburg has to be frustrated he has earned this chance no offense to Ortiz but Westburg Is I thnnk  the better player

Westburg has more power but its hard to say which player is better.  They have different strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, wildcard said:

Westburg has more power but its hard to say which player is better.  They have different strengths.

The one thing we usually know is that defense is defense.  It might take a hitter some time to adjust to major league pitching, but you can usually count on a great fielder to be a great fielder immediately.  Maybe some outfielders have difficulty adjusting to having a third deck on stadiums and tracking fly balls.  But infielders don’t have that issue.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/14/2023 at 12:25 PM, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Not going to lie I didn't even know Kolozsvary was on the 26 man roster. 

Just in case people were wondering if Kolozsvary will be back.  He signed and played today with Saint Paul Saints AAA (Twins) FYI  (Tony Wolters who is the Twins equivalent to Bemboom was put on IL today).  Change in location didn't change his results.  0-4, 3K, 0-1 on catching base stealers.  Were up 4-1 into 8th and blew it in the bottom of 8 and 9 to lose 5-4.  The loss by the Saints today make the magic number for Tides at 1.  So if this was an elaborate plan by Elias to assure the Tides of a 1st half win and playoff spot... Good on him.  (Please smell the sarcasm)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, oriolefan1035 said:

I don’t understand why Ortiz is up if we’re not going to play him. I’ve seen enough of Mateo for a while to justify Ortiz becoming the everyday shortstop for a little while to see what he has.

It is remarkable how much Mateo has fallen off. Through April he was hitting .347 with an OPS of 1.062 and 6 HRs with 83 PA
Since then in 139 PA, he has hit .160 with an OPS of .381 with no HRs.

I am also puzzled about the reluctance to give Ortiz any playing time other than at 2B vs lefties. If nothing else, Mateo could use a few days off and a chance to reset. I would love to see the April version of Mateo again, but why not give Ortiz a real chance to see what he can do? You can still play Mateo vs lefties and move Ortiz to 2B, but someone is going to have to hit at least a little bit at SS.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The game is already tied. If he gets thrown out, the O's still have a runner in scoring position and just one out. You really didn't have much to lose by sending him there, with a chance to end the game.
    • Yes.  He’s not a great bunter but at least try it once.   Santander was today’s choker.  He’s gotta be able to hit a freaking fly ball there.  
    • Same exact question Ravens fans ask every season.  No killer instinct.  In the game’s biggest moments, they come up small.  Exactly what you saw today.  Pathetic 
    • Should we have gone with a suicide or safety squeeze with Mullins? He might be better at bunting than hitting deep fly balls. Just a thought. 
    • I agree with the second but not the first. If the first fails, that's an extra out. If the second fails then they just get an out at home instead of an out at first, which is not really relevant with Gunnar going to 3rd. For the first case I'd think you need to be like 80% to succeed for it to be right, but for the second like 20%.
    • Bump. Tonight's game wasn't just "winnable" -- it would have been one of the top 2-3 wins of the season. Down 2 in the 9th and we come out single, single, walk, double to tie the game and have two of our fastest runners on 2nd and 3rd with no outs, with our 2-3-4 hitters coming up next.  And our guys gagged. They wilted under pressure. They choked.  Again.  This has happened so many times this season that I believe we need to consider the real possibility that the Orioles as currently constructed lack the character, stamina, -- the heart, if you will -- to win games like this. I think these players fail so often because they expect to fail. I remember after we won it all in '83 reporters were interviewing Ken Singleton in the locker room and one of them asked if the Orioles had been lucky. "You make your own luck" he responded. Well, the 2024 Orioles are making their own bad luck over and over again. How does that cycle of failure come to an end? I wish I knew.
    • I know the OH hates Holliday, but it's a no brainer keeping him over Soto. We're talking about bench players who are going to, at most, have a small role in a few games. Soto has no pop and is slow. He's a warm body as it is. Holliday's ability to run can be very useful in the playoffs. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...