Jump to content

John Means pitching for Bowie tonight?


ace20251

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

What is the move we make to add Means?  60 day IL’ing Vavra, or Bautista, to clear a spot on the 40 man?  Optioning one of Hall, Irvin, or Khreibel, for the 26 man move?

I’m guessing it’s Vavra and Hall. We save the Bautista 60 day IL in case we need to add someone to the 40 man for the playoffs. For example Holliday or a 3rd C. MLB would have to approve such a move. That could be why we’re slow playing the Bautista injury news because MLB would almost certainly approve any move regarding a Bautista 60 day IL. Leaves the door open for Jackson. 

For the 26 man I would guess Krehbiel. Hall has looked OK with flashes of great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To make room for Means, I would put Jorge Lopez on the "IL" or see if you can sneak him through waivers and put him in AAA. I don't believe he is eligible for the postseason anyway.  At this point, might as well give reps to those that can help us win a playoff game. 

Its crazy to think that we essentially have another MLB Bullpen at AAA right now with Baker, Baumann, Vespi, Akin, Zimmerman, Krehbiel, Wells ,and Voth

Our Bullpen Depth is really good; just missing that shutdown closer with Felix out. I still wonder if Flaherty wouldn't thrive in a closer role

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

For the 26 man I would guess Krehbiel. Hall has looked OK with flashes of great. 

And that’s why Hall probably stays because of upside in a pen that could use it with Bautista down. I think we know what we have in Khreibel and Irvin. So it’s a righty bullpen arm versus the multiple innings that Irvin could eat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Plus if McDermott keeps pitching like he has he will be ready or close to ready for a call up to the majors in the rotation.   And Hall will no doubt be stretched out in the spring as a starter.  6 years of control for both those guys.

Those things are possible pluses, but we’ll see if they become established major league starters.  Both of them could be bullpen guys.  If we’re getting to that, we still control Cano for 5 years, Bautista for 4 (one of which may be down the drain if he needs TJ surgery, Perez for 3, not to mention a bunch of other guys.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScGO's said:

Its crazy to think that we essentially have another MLB Bullpen at AAA right now with Baker, Baumann, Vespi, Akin, Zimmerman, Krehbiel, Wells ,and Voth

Our Bullpen Depth is really good; just missing that shutdown closer with Felix out. I still wonder if Flaherty wouldn't thrive in a closer role

 

I've had the same take on the Norfolk pen (also McFarland), espec. given their MLB experience... but on closer inspection I would call that list (except for Wells) AAAA more than MLB quality. 

BTW that's an intriguing idea of Flaherty as closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, scarey1999 said:

I know it’s a Means thread, but Cowser has not looked very good in CF last night or tonight. Either misplayed or took poor routes on several balls hit his way. 

I remember Cowser taking some poor routes when he was up with the O's too. The coaches probably need to work with him on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, now said:

I've had the same take on the Norfolk pen (also McFarland), espec. given their MLB experience... but on closer inspection I would call that list (except for Wells) AAAA more than MLB quality. 

BTW that's an intriguing idea of Flaherty as closer.

I don't know; I think we just have really good depth so it appears as AAAA to us because we have the 2nd most wins in MLB and are more loaded than we can remember.

I think all the players I mentioned could be in over 50% of most bullpens in MLB and perform well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2023 at 9:09 AM, ScGO's said:

To make room for Means, I would put Jorge Lopez on the "IL" or see if you can sneak him through waivers and put him in AAA. I don't believe he is eligible for the postseason anyway.  At this point, might as well give reps to those that can help us win a playoff game. 

Its crazy to think that we essentially have another MLB Bullpen at AAA right now with Baker, Baumann, Vespi, Akin, Zimmerman, Krehbiel, Wells ,and Voth

Our Bullpen Depth is really good; just missing that shutdown closer with Felix out. I still wonder if Flaherty wouldn't thrive in a closer role

 

I like the idea .. at least try and see .. He pitched out of pen just last year for St Louis 

 

“However, Flaherty showed he could adapt to a relief role Tuesday night. He entered the game in the seventh with the score 7-7 after the Cardinals scored four runs in the top of the inning to tie it.

Pitching in a high-leverage situation, Flaherty kept the score even.

After giving up a leadoff single to Ke’Bryan Hayes, Flaherty got Ben Gamel to ground into a double play. Flaherty then struck out Tyler Heineman to end the inning.

Working in relief for just the fourth time in his career was no big deal for Flaherty. He says it also won’t be a big deal if being used out of the bullpen is his role for the postseason.

“As a starter, (the) goal is to get in, throw strikes, get ahead, put up a zero,” Flaherty said. “No different than coming out as a starter trying to put up a shutdown inning after we put up some runs.”

 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnperrotto/2022/10/05/st-louis-cardinals-looking-for-important-outs-from-jack-flaherty-in-postseason/amp/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tom_o'malley said:

Pretty sure Means will be optioned today to AAA. Heard he has options left. No reason to bring him up until earlier next week since he can’t pitch for a few days. But he will need to be added to the 40 today I believe 

That thought never even crossed my mind. I suppose that is a possibility if he does have options. I wasn't aware that he had options though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...