Jump to content

Colorado Series


ShoelesJoe

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

So, being me, I had to test this a little.  I looked at every team that finished under .400 from 2013-22, except for the shortened 2020 season.  There were 26 such teams.  I compared how they did in the first 108 games (2/3 of the season) with the final 54 (1/3).   

Of the 26 teams, 17 did worse in the final third than they’d done in the previous two thirds, 7 teams did better, 2 did exactly the same.  On average, the teams were 2.1 games worse than “expected” based on the record at the two-thirds mark.  That’s a drop in winning percentage of about .040 in the final third.   

So, I’d say the effect exists, but it’s not huge.  

The worst discrepancy was the 2017 Tigers, who were 51-57 at the two-thirds mark, but went 13-40 the rest in the way, 12.5 games worse than “expected.”  The biggest gainer was the 2018 Royals, who were 34-74 at the two-thirds mark, but went 24-30 in the final third, allowing the Orioles to fall below them and get the first pick in the draft.


 

I've got your number now, Frobby.  You're an AI bot with a huge baseball database.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

So, being me, I had to test this a little.  I looked at every team that finished under .400 from 2013-22, except for the shortened 2020 season.  There were 26 such teams.  I compared how they did in the first 108 games (2/3 of the season) with the final 54 (1/3).   

Of the 26 teams, 17 did worse in the final third than they’d done in the previous two thirds, 7 teams did better, 2 did exactly the same.  On average, the teams were 2.1 games worse than “expected” based on the record at the two-thirds mark.  That’s a drop in winning percentage of about .040 in the final third.   

So, I’d say the effect exists, but it’s not huge.  

The worst discrepancy was the 2017 Tigers, who were 51-57 at the two-thirds mark, but went 13-40 the rest in the way, 12.5 games worse than “expected.”  The biggest gainer was the 2018 Royals, who were 34-74 at the two-thirds mark, but went 24-30 in the final third, allowing the Orioles to fall below them and get the first pick in the draft.


 

You’re sick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's comical how bad the Rockies pen is.  They aren't a terrible team if their bullpen pitches at a level higher than the Bowie Baysox.

 

You could call it bad luck but after watching the Rays tee off on their bullpen, and then us doing the same.... way too much smoke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hallas said:

It's comical how bad the Rockies pen is.  They aren't a terrible team if their bullpen pitches at a level higher than the Bowie Baysox.

 

You could call it bad luck but after watching the Rays tee off on their bullpen, and then us doing the same.... way too much smoke.

Their offense has an OPS+ of 83.   The starters have an ERA that’s 0.80 runs/game worse than their bullpen, whereas MLB-wide starters do 0.28 runs/game worse. So yes, they are a terrible team regardless of what their bullpen does.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2023 at 6:12 PM, Frobby said:

So, being me, I had to test this a little.  I looked at every team that finished under .400 from 2013-22, except for the shortened 2020 season.  There were 26 such teams.  I compared how they did in the first 108 games (2/3 of the season) with the final 54 (1/3).   

Of the 26 teams, 17 did worse in the final third than they’d done in the previous two thirds, 7 teams did better, 2 did exactly the same.  On average, the teams were 2.1 games worse than “expected” based on the record at the two-thirds mark.  That’s a drop in winning percentage of about .040 in the final third.   

So, I’d say the effect exists, but it’s not huge.  

The worst discrepancy was the 2017 Tigers, who were 51-57 at the two-thirds mark, but went 13-40 the rest in the way, 12.5 games worse than “expected.”  The biggest gainer was the 2018 Royals, who were 34-74 at the two-thirds mark, but went 24-30 in the final third, allowing the Orioles to fall below them and get the first pick in the draft.


 

You'd probably have to dig deeper and see if the 17 teams that did worse were more active in moving players than the other 9 before drawing a conclusion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's nice to win the series, but not a great showing. After a Toronto series that left you thinking "Damn, we could have swept them," a series that leaves you thinking, "Damn, it's a good thing we weren't swept." The O's needed an overturned catcher violation and some pretty flukey hits to win their two games. I hope they are a little crisper against the White Sox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moshagge3 said:

It's nice to win the series, but not a great showing. After a Toronto series that left you thinking "Damn, we could have swept them," a series that leaves you thinking, "Damn, it's a good thing we weren't swept." The O's needed an overturned catcher violation and some pretty flukey hits to win their two games. I hope they are a little crisper against the White Sox.

They didn’t play great this series. It’s also baseball. Going to have some off days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

They didn’t play great this series. It’s also baseball. Going to have some off days. 

I’ll be more concerned if we see this over the next couple of days. Need a couple of “bust out the whoopin stick” games where we score 6+ runs against a Sox team that is probably as bad as the Rockies. But keep getting 2/3 and it’s hard to complain too much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RavensNOsGuy said:

I’ll be more concerned if we see this over the next couple of days. Need a couple of “bust out the whoopin stick” games where we score 6+ runs against a Sox team that is probably as bad as the Rockies. But keep getting 2/3 and it’s hard to complain too much. 

Saw on postgame Hyde basically summed up the series saying they didn’t swing bats well this weekend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • He makes $43 million this year. The Mets are paying $21 million of that. I don’t think we pick up the remaining $10+ post deadline for 10-12 starts. It would just depend on what Texas would ask for to pick up the tab. 
    • Haynie on 105.7, has been beating the Luis Robert drum for months on the O’s pre game show. So I think that’s why people like the idea of Robert. Robert also is always hurt.  We need a bat. Probably a RH bat to DH in the playoffs versus a LH SP. That bat is Mayo. It’s just hard to get Mayo up before September when we get the extra roster spot. 
    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...