Jump to content

September Roster Expansion


RVAOsFan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, NCRaven said:

Or they felt that an outfielder was needed until Hays and Hicks are healthy and felt Cowser was the best (or easiest) available option.

Maybe I’m whistling past the graveyard, but I don’t think Hays is so unhealthy that he’s going to sit a significant amount.  He’s definitely been a bit hobbled this week, but he’s also been hitting extremely well the last two weeks and playing good defense too.  I applaud  Hyde resting Hays yesterday, which got him two full days off after slamming into the wall while making an outstanding catch, but I will be quite surprised if he’s not in the lineup tomorrow.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Maybe I’m whistling past the graveyard, but I don’t think Hays is so unhealthy that he’s going to sit a significant amount.  He’s definitely been a bit hobbled this week, but he’s also been hitting extremely well the last two weeks and playing good defense too.  I applaud  Hyde resting Hays yesterday, which got him two full days off after slamming into the wall while making an outstanding catch, but I will be quite surprised if he’s not in the lineup tomorrow.   

Right. If he’s out, it won’t be more for another game or 2 unless it’s worse than we think and he’s headed to the IL because he was hobbling earlier in the week too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a case of modern roster maneuvering.  They're not afraid to call up a player for a game or two to fill a very temporary need - player with a minor but nagging injury or a bullpen that is spent as two examples.  Watching Kjerstad and Cowser over the past two weeks, I begin to wonder if some of them are hitting the wall, so to speak.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orioles have Urias-Westburg-Frazier-Mateo for 2 spots in INF with Gunnar being an everyday player. Ortiz is not fast. Would be nice at times to get Santander and Hays off their feet especially the former. 
 

Cowser fits as a better bench piece right now. If Kjerstad is called up it necessitates a 40 man move and who do you sit for him to play?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I guess for me, the cry was that Cowser was struggling and had to go down because of that and, like Grayson, had to go work on things.

He went to AAA and really didn’t hit that well. So, either he didn’t need to go down and work on things and that was all a bunch of bs or his performance down there was much better than the numbers show.

It’s not like he’s the only OFer down there and it’s not like the Os can’t use Frazier, OHearn, Mateo or maybe even Westburg for a few games before Hicks comes back.

The biggest issue is he didn't have an opportunity and the team didn't need him. That's still an issue but at least we have a roster spot open. He's already shown he can hit AAA. I think most everyone is on board with his body of work there. Working on things was a bonus and hopefully it helped. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

The biggest issue is he didn't have an opportunity and the team didn't need him. That's still an issue but at least we have a roster spot open. He's already shown he can hit AAA. I think most everyone is on board with his body of work there. Working on things was a bonus and hopefully it helped. 

I disagree .. i think his hitting AAA  well was before he was called up , then he was absolutely awful, not just sort of bad, but abysmal in his  callup and has not impressed back at Norfolk. I would rather have had Kjerstad, Ortiz or Holliday, but we shall see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, and correct me if I'm wrong, but people need to appreciate that just because these two guys were brought up initially, it does not mean they must or will occupy the roster spots for the entirety of the month.  The team is going to cycle through roster spots 27 and 28, just as they have 24-26 all year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles have to be careful if they don't want a player ending up on a competitor's roster. Teams like the Rangers, Guardians, Twins, and the Astros are fair position to pounce on a waiver right now. So if the team DFA's Voth or Fujinami, there's always the chance one of them can wind up on an opponent's roster.

These decisions aren't easy. That's why Mike Elias & Sig Mejdal (hopefully) gets paid the big bucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...