Jump to content

Can anyone beat Atlanta anyway???


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

May not even have to face them. 
 

I agree they are clearly the best team. To be honest the team that concerns me the most in the AL is Seattle. I would be disappointed to see the Orioles lose to anyone but less so to those two teams. The AL has better overall teams but nobody wows me in either league other than Atlanta. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are basically like us plus Acuna and Murphy hitting close to 1.000 each... And better pitching. And a healthy closer. However, have only two more wins than us playing in an easier division. They will be a big favorite but you never know what might happen.  http://powerrankingsguru.com/mlb/strength-of-schedule.php

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its possible by Sunday night the Dodgers have swept them, and the teams are tied.     

As Sig is a rest scientist, I'm sure he'd love to see how his strategically rested young guys can do against a bunch of Braves in Game 180.

Sean Murphy, Orlando Arcia, Eddie Rosario and Marcell Ozuna are good players having very nice seasons but for me there's a whiff of Ryan O'Hearn on that half of the lineup.

Spencer Strider is laboratory perfection but also someone who only pulled a $450k bonus at age 21.75.    I'm not trading Grayson Rodriguez for him today.    The Kyle Bradish, $400k bonus man, lab experiments also show some promising results.

Baseball may not give us a LAD-ATL NLCS so enjoy the Labor Day weekend show while its here, and NL HFA is still up for grabs.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, DocJJ said:

geez.... they're starting to remind me of the '27 Yankees....!

 

My first World Series was 1966-the Dodgers of Sandy Koufax, Don Drysdale, etc against us .. we had Moe Drawbowsky and Wally Bunker 

 

I went to the first game 1969 World Series … our Orioles were the 1927 Yankees .. 109 wins .. HOFers everywhere.

The Mets had Ron Swoboda and Al Weis. 
 

Yes, the “worse” team not only can win the World Series, they usually do. 

Edited by tntoriole
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...