Jump to content

How many rookies in the lineup is too many to win?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

As others have said, it all depends on the rookie. If we are still counting Westburg, he had a .715 OPS which was better than Frazier and his defense was also far superior. So that replacement of vet to rookie should be a net positive rather than negative. For Urias and Mateo, I don't think the bar is all that high either...and Holliday should be able to clear it. 

As for the OF, that's a bit more of a challenge. We saw Cowser struggle so there would likely be a bigger adjustment period there and Hays was a 2.6 WAR player. Mullins had a down year and Santander isn't as good defensively, but the both produced more WAR than Hays. Expecting Cowser to jump in and give over 2 WAR is probably a stretch for an expectation in year one, though it's certainly possible. Same with Kjerstad. 

What I would like to see is an infield of Mountcastle, Holliday, Henderson and Westburg. And an OF/DH situation of: Hays, Mullins, Santander and Kjerstad. That gives you two rookies starting (3 if you count Westburg). I wouldn't have an issue if they non-tendered Mateo or moved Urias and had Ortiz also on the roster in a utility role either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Yes of course.

Let’s go with this hypothetical:

Trade Santander and Mountcastle

Trade one of Westburg or Ortiz

Holliday goes to the minors for defense/service time..up by June 1.

Mayo, Kjerstad and Cowser make OD roster.

 

offense is this:

IFers: OHearn, Mayo, Westburg/Ortiz, Gunnar, Urias, Mateo

OFers: Kjerstad, Cowser, Mullins, Hilliard, Hays

C- Adley, McCann

So, 3 rookies to start and a 4th in Holliday by June.

Why can’t that offense compete?  I mean, it may not but it may not if we kept the vets too.

What I would say and it’s what I have said all offseason, I think if your intention is to insert 3-4 rookies into the lineup this year, that means we should upgrade the pitching staff. 

That offense would probably be worse than 2023.  Probably no WS contender there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

They can play rookies.  But can they play rookies going through adjustment periods and contend?

Depends how long and severe those adjustment periods are, and how good theses players are once the adjustment period is over.   The ‘75 Red Sox did okay with rookies Fred Lynn and Jim Rice in their lineup every day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Depends how long and severe those adjustment periods are, and how good theses players are once the adjustment period is over.   The ‘75 Red Sox did okay with rookies Fred Lynn and Jim Rice in their lineup every day.  

1975?  Really.  Why don't you join Drungo and go back to 1908.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Adley, Gunnar, GRod and Westburg all had adjustment periods.   What O's rookie has not?

Most recent O's rookie have, no question.  At the same time looking not just recently and not just at the Os, some players start producing pretty much immediately.  Corbin Carroll, for example, when first called up in 2022 for his first 3 months in the MLB had an OPS of .800, .833 and .830.  Then pretty much did the same thing all of 2023.  He didn't have an adjustment period.  And I'm sure there are many other examples too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, wildcard said:

That offense would probably be worse than 2023.  Probably no WS contender there.

Well the offense may be worse regardless if they do as well with RISP.

But, let’s just take that out for a moment.

You are losing 6.1 fWAR with Frazier, Hicks, AS and Mounty off the team. 
 

Can Mayo, Kjerstad, Holliday and Cowser make up for that?  
 

I’d be surprised if they didn’t.  And maybe some of the existing players hit better in 2024 than they did in 2023.

But again, there is pitching and defense too. You can allow less runs next year and even if you score less, you can still win a lot of games.

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

Most recent O's rookie have, no question.  At the same time looking not just recently and not just at the Os, some players start producing pretty much immediately.  Corbin Carroll, for example, when first called up in 2022 for his first 3 months in the MLB had an OPS of .800, .833 and .830.  Then pretty much did the same thing all of 2023.  He didn't have an adjustment period.  And I'm sure there are many other examples too.  

Few and far between.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well the offense may be worse regardless if they do as well with RISP.

But, let’s just take that out for a moment.

You are losing 6.1 fWAR with Frazier, Hicks, AS and Mounty off the team. 
 

Can Mayo, Kjerstad, Holliday and Cowser make up for that?  
 

I’d be surprised if they didn’t.  And maybe some of the existing players hit better in 2024 than they did in 2023.

But again, there is pitching and defense too. You can allow less runs next year and even if you score less, you can still win a lot of games.

I doubt that Elias off season goal is to make the offense worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a Kremer discussion going on re: whether he's the guy you want to give the ball to in the playoffs. 

I think there's a similar discussion about Hays, Mountcastle and Mullins and ABs. I'd like the young guys (my list is Holliday, Mayo, Basallo and Ortiz) to get up here as soon as we can really justify it. For all but Basallo, you could justify either opening day or after the super 2.

I want them here and acclimated by this year's playoffs, and hopefully booming by the 2025 playoffs. I get that we're managing a rolling window of contracts, but you'd love to see all of those guys hitting their strides at the same time as Adley, Gunnar, Westburg and Kjerstad.

I think that core will hit in the playoffs. It should be about getting ready for that, and not about winning the division. Take the lumps early. Grow. Destroy the competition. Lol. 

Edited by LookinUp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Few and far between.

Probably not quite as uncommon as you are acting.  Unlikely I'll grant you, but it's not impossible for a Mayo/Holiday/whoever to come up and pretty much start hitting from the word go.  The 'adjustment period' is one of those urban myths that everyone claims (like Jeter was a great defensive shortstop and 'clutch exists' 🙂) it to be true but isn't really.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

There's a Kremer discussion going on re: whether he's the guy you want to give the ball to in the playoffs. 

I think there's a similar discussion about Hays, Mountcastle and Mullins and ABs. I'd like the young guys (my list is Holliday, Mayo, Basallo and Ortiz) to get up here as soon as we can really justify it. For all but Basallo, you could justify either opening day or after the super 2.

I want them here and acclimated by this year's playoffs, and hopefully booming by the 2025 playoffs. I get that we're managing an rolling window of contracts, but you'd love to see all of those guys hitting their strides at the same time as Adley, Gunnar, Westburg and Kjerstad.

I think that core will hit in the playoffs. It should be about getting ready for that, and not about winning the division. Take the lumps early. Grow. Destroy the competition. Lol. 

I think it should be about going for the WS every year.   I think Elias can do that and still develop the guys you talked about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

Probably not quite as uncommon as you are acting.  Unlikely I'll grant you, but it's not impossible for a Mayo/Holiday/whoever to come up and pretty much start hitting from the word go.  The 'adjustment period' is one of those urban myths that everyone claims (like Jeter was a great defensive shortstop and 'clutch exists' 🙂) it to be true but isn't really.  

I am just going by what has happen to the O's top talent in Adley, Gunnar, GRod and Westburg.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...