Jump to content

Just a Rumor


Tryptamine

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, casadeozo said:

could someone provide a refresher on what the implications would be if JA and family were to sell now versus after Peter passes away? I assume there would be major estate tax implications though admittedly dont know the workings of that.

From my quite limited understanding, if they sell before Peter passes.   They are taxed on all of the gains from the original purchase price.  Some hundreds of millions (can’t remember) so much more gain.

 

But if the kids sell after inheritance, they get what is called stepped up basis and are taxed on the gains from the current valuation to the purchase price.    No idea how the current valuation is proved to the IRS.  

Edited by murph
  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, murph said:

From my quite limited understanding, if they sell before Peter passes.   They are taxed on the all of the gains from the original purchase price.  But if the kids sell after inheritance, they get what is called stepped up basis and are taxed on the gains from the current valuation to the purchase price.    No idea how the current valuation is proved to the IRS.  

You get an appraisal from a credible appraiser, knowing that the IRS may challenge its reasonableness.  

The fact that Georgia Angelos is alive, and may live a long time, may defer the “inherited basis.”
 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

You get an appraisal from a credible appraiser, knowing that the IRS may challenge its reasonableness.  

The fact that Georgia Angelos is alive, and may live a long time, may defer the “inherited basis.”
 

Thanks.

The inherited bases would be the stepped up basis, correct?  
 

Edit: Nevermind.   Understand you are saying the original purchase price now.   Didn’t know there was a statute of limitations of a sort on that. 
 

if there is a way around paying the gains on the original purchase price, it has a huge tax implication, which was my understanding of why or one of the reasons why they have not sold yet    

Edited by murph
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, murph said:

Thanks.

The inherited bases would be the stepped up basis, correct?  
 

if there is a way around paying the gains on the original purchase price, it has a huge tax implication, which was my understanding of why or one of the reasons why they have not sold yet    

It’s likely.  However, there are estate taxes to pay on the current value of the estate, separate from the income tax.  That caps out at 40% federal, 16% Maryland.   So whether or not income taxes are due, the estate taxes will be so high that a sale may be required to raise the cash.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Keygans said:

Sorry didn’t mean to imply that the source was the same.    Highly unlikely they are the same.   Just passed along what I heard.  
 

At this point, I’m almost thinking where there’s smoke there’s fire… but we can only hope!   Hell, it would be the best Christmas gift in a long time!  

Yea pretty much best since the first Christmas, a little over 2000 years ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

How much of the team Peter Angelos owns is one of those things John Angelos told the media he would tell them about "next week." 

I've seen reports that Peter owns about 75 percent. John said, I'm pretty sure, that it's 70 percent. In either case, Peter can make the decision to sell the team. The minority owners can sue if they think the price is inadequate.

Peter Angelos doesn’t have the capacity to make any decisions.  This isn’t speculation but fact.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Tryptamine said:

So take it with a grain of salt, but a guy who has repeatedly proven to be accurate with his insider information regarding the Mets is apparently claiming that a deal has been made but wont be announced for a while where the Orioles have been sold to the Carlyle Group for 1.4B. Why he would have this particularly info as a Met fan(though he is from Balitmore), I do not know, but he's been tremendously accurate with this stuff in the past so I'm just throwing it out there. 

 

 

The line about Peter Angelos is suspect. His mind has reportedly been comatose which is why his wife appointed John to run the team.

With that said, the fact this is coming from New York does make some small amount of sense. New York is the center of the universe when it comes to all things finance, and inside information on major acquisitions.  Steve Cohen, owner of the Mets, made his billions by cleverly leveraging information to build his hedge fund and acquire the wealth he has. He still has those connections, so it's possible he might know something.

 

The New York / Mets part can make sense to me. But I don't know. It seems to have come out of nowhere and the Peter Angelos thing doesn't make any sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why some seem to be hung up on Peter's capacity.  Certainly, he had some kind of Power of Attorney.  If he is "completely" out of it or on the path leading there, the family has probably already invoked that.  But from reading the other thread about the lease, my questions are how much, if any control, the family - JA - would retain in the development around the Park and whether the lease would transfer to new ownership.  The "rumor" could explain why it still hasn't been signed yet in both regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good morning....got a non-update update:

Apparently, we might as well put this rumor to rest for now.   Yes, there is an offer and it is from that group, and they do have an "agreement in place"...BUT....they are waiting for PA to leave us before anything happens.   @Frobby might be able to explain, but apparently there are MAJOR MAJOR TAX implications here in terms of estate planning and $$.   PA's health is declining rapidly supposedly so that is why the news is leaking out...if its news at all. 

Please don't shoot the messenger, and I will shut up as to not end up like the other "insiders'' of the past.     Back to the off-season boys. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swore I would never get into the hate "Angelos" discussions (not really a discussion, but a hate therapy session), but here I am. Peter was (is) not a great owner. He failed in many aspects of the game. The why's and how comes can be discussed. Now, it's not in PA's court, but his family (always a problem with the wealthy).

The team should be sold IMO.....but I prefer some group with a strong, local connection including charitable contributions. Someone that considers Baltimore their home and not some way to increase their wealth (which will likely matter no matter what). I know nothing about the Carlyle group... but if it is a hedge fund group the hairs on the back of my neck stand up...I want a person, not a stockholder group to be responsible for the Orioles.

The grass is always greener..be careful what you wish for, Change for the sake of change is not the way. I'm out of cliches!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter catches a lot of hate on here but at least there would be a chance he would spend with this core. He did it in 1997/1998. He did it in 2005. He did it again with the Buck teams. He even brought in Albert Belle. 

It’s the sons that won’t spent. I do not see this investment group wanting to win a sentimental WS and instead just wanting their bottom line to be the highest. Hope this falls through. 

Isn’t there some billionaire out there that wants to get in on this run?  

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don't think it is really the past 5 games.  It is the next 4 months, potential playoffs, and all of next year that has people concerned.  Remember these elbows aren't just taking guys out this year, but most of next year as well. And Burnes probably won't be around next either. 
    • It is just a real shame that the Os are going through all of these elbows.  Take away all of the elbows going back to last year with Felix and I would say the Os are a lock to get to the WS and would have a great chance to win it all. I haven't seen this many injuries from a teams top guys in such a short amount of time in maybe.....forever. I am starting to wonder if it is something the Os are doing as far as their training.   Trying to obtain too much spin, revs, and velocity. I am a big Colts fan and for years we have complained about all of the knee blowouts and hammy injuries they get when playing at home.  Finally the Colts realized that it might be turf related from their home field and replaced it this past spring.    
    • I've been a fan for a long time too but mostly remember a lot of near misses, not tailspin collapses. 2005 comes to mind (Raffygate, Sammy Sosa, Lee Mazzilli, et al.)... what other seasons are you thinking of, to create scar tissue?
    • I really like Kremer.  Seems like a good guy and a solid arm. But he is not going to be the guy to get you into the playoffs and he especially won't be a guy between a make or break WS championship. 
    • We can hope he’s back to being his #5 self, but he’ll now be a #3, and let’s all x the fingers
    • The 5 game losing streak is a 5 game losing streak.  I am not too concerned about that unless it turns into something bigger. Every team goes through it.  What I am concerned about is losing 3 starters and 2 great relievers since last August with not a lot to replace them other than Burnes.  And they won't even back for most of next year...if at all. Add in the fact that Burnes is more than likely leaving after this year?  Our cupboard pitching wise is pretty bare as it looks right now. So imo you absolutely need to trade some of your AA and AAA players to get pitching help now and for next year.  This team is too good to waste years on players like GH and AR. 
    • Trading Drew Rom for Flaherty was not a big swing. It was trading a maybe prospect for a “hope he’s ok” guy with three months before FA. I am increasingly convinced Mike won’t make any bigger move this season, and what we have is basically what we will have.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...