Jump to content

Craig Kimbrel - Signing


E-D-D-I-E

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, maybenxtyr said:

A lot better. I can't lie, that's my biggest complaint about him. Otherwise, it's a perfectly reasonable move for a team without a backend guy that has playoff expectations.

My thoughts exactly. I want to throw up just thinking about it. Are they going to sign “big papi” next? He strikes me as a super d bag but maybe he is a good guy and his pre pitch semantics are only so bothersome because he was a red sock. Then again,I still hate it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, EddeeEddee said:

Just live on the interest at today's rates and you'd have somewhere around $250,000 per year to live on -- and you wouldn't have spent any of the original $5 million.  

Of course, that $250,000 per year will be worth about $50,000 in today’s money in couple of decades.   

I remember my dad telling me that when he was in law school (early 1950s) he and his friends agreed that if someone guaranteed them $10,000 a year for life, they’d be set.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Of course, that $250,000 per year will be worth about $50,000 in today’s money in couple of decades.   

And... today's interest rates will not be here forever. I can earn 5% practically risk free in a CD, but in 2-3 years I have to renew it at who-knows-what rate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jagwar said:

And... today's interest rates will not be here forever. I can earn 5% practically risk free in a CD, but in 2-3 years I have to renew it at who-knows-what rate. 

Aren’t CDs what really really really old people put money into? You could just be a hard money lender and your money is backed by real estate and you are earning 10-12%. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kimbrel  has the 8th most career saves in MLB history.   417.   Three behind Kenley Jansen's 420 which  is the most by any active pitcher.    

If Kimbrel gets 25 saves this year to 442 he will pass:

Billy Wagner 422

John Franco 424

Francisco Rodriguez (KRod).  437

That would leave Kimbrel 4th or 5th on the all time list depending on what Jansen does.  

https://www.espn.com/mlb/history/leaders/_/type/pitching/sort/saves

 

 

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

Of course, that $250,000 per year will be worth about $50,000 in today’s money in couple of decades.   

I remember my dad telling me that when he was in law school (early 1950s) he and his friends agreed that if someone guaranteed them $10,000 a year for life, they’d be set.
 

I remember having this conversation with my Dad numerous times:

"Dad, can I have a raise in my allowance?"

"You get plenty.  Do you know what I used to do with 50 cents when I was your age?  I would take the bus to town, buy a hamburger and a Coke, go to the movies, buy a pack of Necco Wafers, take the bus back home and have 4 cents left over."

"OK, Dad.  Can I have enough to do that?"

"Go out and play."

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Frobby said:

Of course, that $250,000 per year will be worth about $50,000 in today’s money in couple of decades.   

I remember my dad telling me that when he was in law school (early 1950s) he and his friends agreed that if someone guaranteed them $10,000 a year for life, they’d be set.
 

Maybe not in a couple of decades but in several decades, yes.  I wasn't actually suggesting a young person should actually live on interest, or some other investment return, without trying to gain more income.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asked Google why Craig Kimbrel does that pose and I found this interesting piece of journalism...

"Craig didn’t always strike his signature pitching pose, though. It actually came about as a result of a 2010 injury. Before that, he would hold his arm behind his back (as most pitchers tend to do), but that became too painful when he experienced biceps tendinitis — an inflammation of the upper biceps tendon. He started holding his arm out to the side instead, and the pose sort of progressed from there."

https://www.distractify.com/p/why-does-kimbrel-pose-like-that

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sevastras said:

Aren’t CDs what really really really old people put money into? You could just be a hard money lender and your money is backed by real estate and you are earning 10-12%. 

At today's high interest rates CDs or some other kind of "cash" investment are not just for old people.  A lot of investors have moved a big chunk of their money into high interest accounts or bonds or something similar.  Of course interest rates will fall eventually.  Real estate is no longer a no brainer investment with property so overvalued and high interest rates preventing property investors from borrowing at reasonable rates.  And commercial real estate is expected to be the next big economic meltdown, mainly for big investors and banks exposed to half empty office buildings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per Heyman/MLB Trade Rumors:

Quote

Kimbrel can increase the value of the buyout based on game and games finished in 2024, per Jon Heyman of The New York Post. It will be an extra $100K for pitching in 35, 40, 45, 50 and 55 games, as well as another $100K for finishing the same amounts. If Kimbrel were to max out all of those, the buyout would jump to $2MM.

Heyman on X

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

Of course, that $250,000 per year will be worth about $50,000 in today’s money in couple of decades.   

I remember my dad telling me that when he was in law school (early 1950s) he and his friends agreed that if someone guaranteed them $10,000 a year for life, they’d be set.
 

If invested in a mix of stocks and bonds, an individual with a 60 year life expectancy would have a Safe Withdrawal Rate of around $175,000, which would adjust for inflation over time. https://earlyretirementnow.com/2016/12/07/the-ultimate-guide-to-safe-withdrawal-rates-part-1-intro/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...