Jump to content

Another one from the rumor mill - Stephenson


Yossarian

Recommended Posts

It’s not really the rumor mill.  It’s the total conjecture mill.

Whether GM Mike Elias is actually looking at Stephenson and considering signing him has not been reported, but Schoenfield thinks this would be a great fit and is predicting it happens.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

ESPN writer predicting the O's land reliever Robert Stephenson (Tampa Bay) to add to the bullpen.

https://www.si.com/mlb/orioles/news/baltimore-orioles-predicted-land-former-rays-reliever-free-agency-brad9

 

I wouldn't be opposed to this. 

 

Thanks for sharing this.  FWIW this seems more like a prediction than a rumor.  Appreciated nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

ESPN writer predicting the O's land reliever Robert Stephenson (Tampa Bay) to add to the bullpen.

https://www.si.com/mlb/orioles/news/baltimore-orioles-predicted-land-former-rays-reliever-free-agency-brad9

 

I wouldn't be opposed to this. 

 

'''''' Waiting for Sports Guy to tell you how dumb you are for posting anything published by SI and they are now just in it for clicks******

This article is just is under the ESPN paywall.

Quote

Even though the Orioles signed Kimbrel to replace the injured Felix Bautista, Stephenson fits their price point and he went to the next level after he introduced a cutter with the Tampa Bay Rays. I'd rather have Stephenson on a three-year, $30 million contract than Hader on something close to nine figures.

I think we need to invest in a starter rather than drop $10 million per. Elias has never given a free agent a multi year deal buyt is going to hand out 3/30?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

'''''' Waiting for Sports Guy to tell you how dumb you are for posting anything published by SI and they are now just in it for clicks******

This article is just is under the ESPN paywall.

I think we need to invest in a starter rather than drop $10 million per. Elias has never given a free agent a multi year deal buyt is going to hand out 3/30?

With some of the money we’ve seen thrown around for mediocre starters I think this could be a very prudent move if they decide to allocate their resources this way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

'''''' Waiting for Sports Guy to tell you how dumb you are for posting anything published by SI and they are now just in it for clicks******

This article is just is under the ESPN paywall.

I think we need to invest in a starter rather than drop $10 million per. Elias has never given a free agent a multi year deal buyt is going to hand out 3/30?

Yep.  Kind to hard to believe the O's would do that contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is too big a gamble for a below average reliever the last few years in the majors.  I get he had a great year with the Rays and stuff can be great but I would rather they spend money on someone with a better track record especially for a team with budget constraints.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

'''''' Waiting for Sports Guy to tell you how dumb you are for posting anything published by SI and they are now just in it for clicks******

This article is just is under the ESPN paywall.

I think we need to invest in a starter rather than drop $10 million per. Elias has never given a free agent a multi year deal buyt is going to hand out 3/30?

He wouldn't be wrong. SI has been straight garbage....as has most offseason reporting. I know it's the day and age that we're in (clicks and likes) but it's gotten absolutely ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CP0861 said:

He wouldn't be wrong. SI has been straight garbage....as has most offseason reporting. I know it's the day and age that we're in (clicks and likes) but it's gotten absolutely ridiculous.

SI is garbage but this is essentially an MLbTR article..it’s just citing someone else’s work..which isn’t anything more than a prediction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...