Jump to content

Did Elias make a blunder?


doccat

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Smell is coming off a dominant Cy Young season. His market isn’t gonna get better next year. 

Exactly. Why would a player settle for a "prove it" type contract when he just won the frickin' Cy Young. Especially a player who's been as up and down throughout his career as Snell. This is the ideal time for him to cash in and it's just going to be a question of how much he and Boras have to come down from their ridiculous contract expections. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Orioles5258 said:

January:
We want Basallo, Norby and Cowser for Luzardo

February:
Hey we just read that Kyle Bradish has a UCL injury
We now want Basallo, Norby, Cowser and Kjrestad for Luzardo

yea i dont think it works like that

I think it does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DocJJ said:

I think it does.

I do contract negotiations for a living (granted in a much different industry). I don't think the asking price goes up from what it was because of this news and a perception that the Orioles may be more desperate, but the asking price is already higher than the Orioles wanted to pay (otherwise a deal would've been done). I do think the balance has changed a bit and the other team may perceive a bit more leverage on their side so they may be less willing (or slower) to lower the asking price further in the back and forth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two things that I'm sure are frustrating Elias right now:

1. This is the slowest developing off-season across baseball in recent memory. It's insane how many guys are still available. Players/agents are reluctant to close deals, and teams are reluctant to part with players in trades. The good news is at least there's options remaining for Elias to try to get, but I'm sure he feels like he should have been able to grab more players by now. 

2. The team sale. It's hard to do huge free agent moves while over $2 billion is changing hands. Until the sale is approved, you can't really just add, for example, Montgomery's $150 million in guaranteed salary to the books. Well you can, but it's just not commonly done I'd imagine. The sale, as welcome as it is, is unfortunately timed with this offseason. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Orioles5258 said:

January:
We want Basallo, Norby and Cowser for Luzardo

February:
Hey we just read that Kyle Bradish has a UCL injury
We now want Basallo, Norby, Cowser and Kjrestad for Luzardo

yea i dont think it works like that

Either trade would be terrible for the O's.  We need another front line starter but not at that price.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, doccat said:

If he was going to add another starter by trade or free agency, the price just shot through the roof with today’s news…

He should have made the move prior to today if he’s known about these injuries for a while…

 

I know if I’m an agent or GM and I get a call from Elias my asking price is WAY higher today than it was 24 hours ago

Actually, I thought he made the right move if he knew about Bradish before closing Burnes.  It may have cost more.  As far as free agents I don't believe it would make much difference $$ now.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2024 at 10:47 PM, doccat said:

If he was going to add another starter by trade or free agency, the price just shot through the roof with today’s news…

He should have made the move prior to today if he’s known about these injuries for a while…

 

I know if I’m an agent or GM and I get a call from Elias my asking price is WAY higher today than it was 24 hours ago

No it's not a blunder. C'mon. You add talent where it makes sense, you don't overpay or stretch your resources thin to add deep depth. Wasn't it a week ago that major publications and outlets were touting the O's as having one of the stronger rotations in baseball? You don't use a small-to-mid-market team's resources to go all in on a $300M contract for a starter when your rotation is already a strength.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

No it's not a blunder. C'mon. You add talent where it makes sense, you don't overpay or stretch your resources thin to add deep depth. Wasn't it a week ago that major publications and outlets were touting the O's as having one of the stronger rotations in baseball? You don't use a small-to-mid-market team's resources to go all in on a $300M contract for a starter when your rotation is already a strength.

Yea but that strength has turned into a giant question mark now. Bradish could be done for the year and Means is already telling us that it’s very likely he won’t be reliable this year.

I don’t disagree that you don’t stretch yourself thin but things are drastically different today than they were this time last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2024 at 11:21 PM, Sports Guy said:

People who think Elias is going to pay way more because of some sense of desperation don’t know Elias or understand how he works.

 

I said this in the Cease thread. I don’t see Elias acting out of desperation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a smaller move is much more likely if any.     Elias likes all the data for a decision and for a couple months there will be incomplete data what kind of contributor Bradish can be for the '24 Orioles.     That will become clear by summer.

Lorenzen/Ryu are the high guys, but just re-reading through the free agents, Zack Greinke is I think a consummate pro in the Gibson mold and has had baseball experiences none of the Odor-Chirinos-Lyles-Gibson mentor types have had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

I said this in the Cease thread. I don’t see Elias acting out of desperation 

Do you think there was a bit of desperation behind what he gave up for Flaherty last year? His good season was back in 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LA2 said:

Do you think there was a bit of desperation behind what he gave up for Flaherty last year? His good season was back in 2019.

I think he did what he could with the restrictions obviously related to adding payroll. It was definitely a bust move and it’s fine if you want to call it desperation. I don’t see it that way! I think he worked the deadline with a hand tied behind his back.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...