Jump to content

Melewski: Hyde sets the rotation


interloper

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's a decent rotation and I hope these guys stay healthy.  

Not expecting anything from Means, not expecting anything from Bradish.  Means, obviously, will be back at some point in time but it's hard to say how effective he'll be.   I understand why they're trying treatment with Bradish, but IMO they're just delaying the inevitable.

 

Yeah, but your opinion is based on nothing.  Even if there’s a 75% chance that Bradish will need surgery, it’s not “inevitable” that he will.   

Anyway, so far what we know is that Elias has said he “expects” Bradish to be back, and so far Bradish has progressed through his throwing program with no apparent setbacks.   So I think your “inevitable” characterization is just your defense mechanism against potential disappointment.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

I think Cole Irvin could be a #5 starter on a World Series team.

 

Given enough starts, I expect results in the same neighborhood as Gibson last year and that's plenty good enough for a #5.  Zero concerns about durability.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Yeah, but your opinion is based on nothing.  Even if there’s a 75% chance that Bradish will need surgery, it’s not “inevitable” that he will.   

Anyway, so far what we know is that Elias has said he “expects” Bradish to be back, and so far Bradish has progressed through his throwing program with no apparent setbacks.   So I think your “inevitable” characterization is just your defense mechanism against potential disappointment.   
 

And I *expect* Elias to say that.  

My opinion is based on the fact that yeah, the treatment can work but these guys end up with TJ more often than not.  I can easily see a scenario where Bradish is back after "no apparent setbacks" and then lasts two or three games and then has "forearm tightness."

So you can characterize my inevitable characterization however you want, I'm just calling it like I see it.  If you're confident that Bradish gets 25+ starts this year, I'd love to have that optimism.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

And I *expect* Elias to say that.  

My opinion is based on the fact that yeah, the treatment can work but these guys end up with TJ more often than not.  I can easily see a scenario where Bradish is back after "no apparent setbacks" and then lasts two or three games and then has "forearm tightness."

So you can characterize my inevitable characterization however you want, I'm just calling it like I see it.  If you're confident that Bradish gets 25+ starts this year, I'd love to have that optimism.  

Yeah. Keeping expectations low is healthy for this kind of thing. We're Orioles fans, if you're not setting pitching expectations low, I kinda feel like you're doing it wrong. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Safelykept said:

I trust the first 4 but we need Means

Agree totally on the first 4. IMO, Irvin is not a starting pitcher on a championship contending team. He can possibly/hopefully succeed for the first month or so, given our soft early season schedule.

But once we start facing the big boys, watch out. He just doesn’t have the stuff to get out good right handed hitters consistently IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

And I *expect* Elias to say that.  

My opinion is based on the fact that yeah, the treatment can work but these guys end up with TJ more often than not.  I can easily see a scenario where Bradish is back after "no apparent setbacks" and then lasts two or three games and then has "forearm tightness."

So you can characterize my inevitable characterization however you want, I'm just calling it like I see it.  If you're confident that Bradish gets 25+ starts this year, I'd love to have that optimism.  

I’m not confident at all.  In fact, 25+ (which would require him to be back before mid-May) is pretty much impossible.   I’m hopeful he can make 20ish starts if things go well and there are no setbacks.  I don’t think it’s certain at all that there won’t be setbacks, I just don’t see the opposite scenario as inevitable.  

I take issue with you saying you’d expect Elias to say what he did. I usually find him to be far more noncommittal when it comes to pitcher injuries.   Now, maybe he was more positive than usual in order not to show his hand in discussions to acquire another pitcher.  But the fact that he hasn’t acquired one suggests to me that he meant what he said.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say this, even if Bradish doesn’t, Means continues to prove to be injury prone, Wells wears down, and Irvin is not effective, we have a lot of ammo in the org to make whatever trade is necessary mid season. 

We should be good any way it goes with those 4 as long as Grayson takes another step, Burnes is Burnes, and Kremer is reliable/serviceable (like he was last year). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, orioles119 said:

Just get the surgery - come back strong in 2025.

If he has TJ surgery, we shouldn’t expect meaningful contributions until 2026.  Maybe could return in limited action by Sept 2025.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Say O! said:

If he has TJ surgery, we shouldn’t expect meaningful contributions until 2026.  Maybe could return in limited action by Sept 2025.

Yeah Means went down in April of 2022 and didn’t return until September of 2023. That seemed abnormally long to me for TJ. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cole Irvin is perfectly fine as the #5 Starter on a contending team and really, he is our SP #7.  He's only in the 5th slot because two guys went down with injury.

Irvin in 2021-23 (his three full/mostly full seasons in the majors): 436.2 IP; 4.16 ERA and 4.29 FIP.  What do you all think most 5th starters look like? Sure he doesn't miss a ton of bats but he doesn't walk people and generally keeps the ball in the ballpark.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m not confident at all.  In fact, 25+ (which would require him to be back before mid-May) is pretty much impossible.   I’m hopeful he can make 20ish starts if things go well and there are no setbacks.  I don’t think it’s certain at all that there won’t be setbacks, I just don’t see the opposite scenario as inevitable.  

I take issue with you saying you’d expect Elias to say what he did. I usually find him to be far more noncommittal when it comes to pitcher injuries.   Now, maybe he was more positive than usual in order not to show his hand in discussions to acquire another pitcher.  But the fact that he hasn’t acquired one suggests to me that he meant what he said.   
 

You can take all the issues you want with me, Froberto Duran, and that's fine.  I take issue with the constant dissection and interpretation of what Elias says to the media and I think I'm one of the few (if not the only member here) who doesn't take him seriously when there are microphones in his face.  I think Elias does a great job of being as honest as he can with the media without delving into much detail.  To me, he's a master of saying a lot without saying anything at all.  If he wanted to, I think he'd have a fantastic career in politics.

I'm as big of a fan of his as anyone else, I appreciate that he makes himself available to the media because I understand that a lot of fans like that and they -unlike myself- love to spend time unpacking what he said...interpreting it, trying to figure out what he means, etc.  To me, it's about as fun as slamming a finger in a car door, but whatever.

So yeah, I expect him to say exactly that, for a number of reasons.  First, he seems to be an overall positive guy.  Second, like you said, maybe he doesn't want to show his hand in discussions to acquire another pitcher...though I hope other GMs aren't sitting around listening to soundclips of Elias speaking and trying to gauge how badly the Orioles need another SP.  Third, maybe Bradish really isn't that bad off and he's actually telling the truth.

We can agree to disagree that having not acquired an SP suggests that he means what he said.  It's a long season, I think he's going to try to make do with what he has already and if Bradish isn't back and we really do need a starter by the deadline, he can get one then.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, interloper said:

And I don't love being in the position of feeling like we need to count on Means, who hasn't thrown significant innings since 2021. I trust Elias, but he's really living on the edge with this rotation. The extreme risk aversion when it comes to trades and signings could come back to bite him, but we'll see. 

Seems like our depth rotation guys are: Zimmermann, Albert Suarez, Teheran, McDermott, Povich. Fine enough to eat some innings, but that's about it. Love McDermott, but can't expect too much from him in his rookie year. 

I don't see the SP depth quite as problematically. It's normal for contending teams to still have some trouble at SP5 and beyond. 

Last year the 100 win Dodgers survived a 6.13 ERA Michael Grove and 7.16 ERA Noah Syndergaard getting 12 starts each. The 104 win Braves survived 7 starts from 7.60 ERA Dylan Dodd, 7 starts from 6.97 ERA Kyle Wright, and 6 starts from 6.40 ERA Michael Soroka. 

This April the Yankees likely 5th starter Clayton Beeter is a rookie who had a 4.94 ERA at AAA last year. One of the Astros' starters Ronel Blanco is an Austin Voth-esque 30 year old with 58.1 career innings of a 4.78 ERA.

These examples are picked to find the bad, of course. But find me a team whose 8th/9th SPs-- or even 6th/7th-- don't have serious question marks. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The Orioles starters absolutely have to do better against the Royals. You can't ask this bullpen to pitch most of the game and expect to win. Right now I probably trust Coulombe the most and Soto (which I never would have guessed a couple weeks back). Perez has been really shaky recently to the point I'm wondering is he nursing a tired arm or minor injuey. Cano hasn't been good as well and O's really need him to get back into a groove. And Akin is usually trustworthy, but only starting the inning clean.
    • I'll be working at Gate F.  If you're getting drunk at Pickles before the game and then walk through the closest gate, you'll walk right past me.
    • What happens if it rains all day?
    • For me, bullpen strategy in a short series is developing a core principle or two and working backwards from that. That’s usually going to involve how we want to pitch to their best guys. In this case, there’s really no way to game Witt. He doesn’t have any discernible platoon splits, and in fact he destroyed RHPs this year. He doesn’t even have any particular pitches he struggles against. If you have to pitch to him, power stuff seems to be the way to go — if he has any weakness, it seems like maybe it’s LHPs who can attack him with high velocity and some sort of off speed weapon (Skubal, Framber, Kikuchi, EdRod, Rodon, Sale, Gore). So maybe you’re looking at Soto and Perez there, although you really just shouldn’t be pitching to him at all if you can avoid it. Beyond him, the other “hero” is Salvador Perez. And that’s from where I’d be building out my strategy. He probably should not see a LHP all series. There’s a fairly meaningful career platoon split there (109 wRC+ to 101), and it’s been more pronounced this year (130 to 110). I would be looking to force feed him ABs against Cano (1/4 with a single), Webb (0/2 with two Ks), and Dominguez. He’s always had trouble with offspeed stuff, which means Webb might be the preferred option. They’ve faced a ton of LH starters in the last week or so, but it seems like their preferred lineup against RHPs stacks LH hitters like Melendez and Gurriel behind Perez. Melendez is awful against LHPs, so ideally Perez might be the last hitter that the starters see. They pinch hit very liberally in platoon fashion in the bottom half of the lineup, so if you brought in someone like Akin behind the starter, they might very well hit for him. Forcing them to do that erases a lot of the platoon stacking in the late innings, so you could subsequently bring in a RHP to pitch to Perez without the same concern that they’d be exposed after him.    In sum, I think the ideal attack plan is for Burnes/Eflin/Kremer to see Perez three times, then bring in Akin or Cionel to pitch to the bottom of what will likely be a lefty-heavy lineup. They’ll potentially PH there, but that’s okay because none of those guys are that good. You then go to one of the RHPs for the top of the lineup, which it seems will consist of Pham, Witt (pitch around), and Perez. Then back to Coulombe or Soto for the bottom of the lineup again.
    • I have two tickets to Game 1 of the WC which I cannot use due to work travel.  Section 352, row 4, seats 9 & 10.  Asking $70 total for the two.  Paid $205 to the Orioles as a season plan member.   PM me if interested.  Paypal preferred.    
    • Can't make game 1. I'll be at game 2...last time I was at a playoff game at Camden, we beat Scherzer and the Tigers.
    • He should be taking fly balls all winter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...