Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2024


Recommended Posts

I've been impressed by Gunnar's defense the last few days. Not sure how many highlight-type plays he's made, but I feel like he consistently makes decently challenging plays look smooth and easy.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

I've been impressed by Gunnar's defense the last few days. Not sure how many highlight-type plays he's made, but I feel like he consistently makes decently challenging plays look smooth and easy.

Great glove, and too many throws with plenty of time making Mounty reach for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/30/2024 at 4:21 PM, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

 

People do need to realize that the season used to start much later than it now does.  Frank Robinson hit 38 homers as a 20-year old rookie, but the season didn’t even start until April 17.  I’d bet there are some other players 22 or younger who hit 10 homers in the first 29 games of the year, but the 29 games weren’t played by April 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

People do need to realize that the season used to start much later than it now does.  Frank Robinson hit 38 homers as a 20-year old rookie, but the season didn’t even start until April 17.  I’d bet there are some other players 22 or younger who hit 10 homers in the first 29 games of the year, but the 29 games weren’t played by April 30.

Wait are you telling me they used to play 154 games or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Remember The Alomar said:

Wait are you telling me they used to play 154 games or something?

And even fewer at times!

On a quick look, Mel Ott hit 10 homers in his team’s first 29 games at age 20.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Frobby said:

People do need to realize that the season used to start much later than it now does.  Frank Robinson hit 38 homers as a 20-year old rookie, but the season didn’t even start until April 17.  I’d bet there are some other players 22 or younger who hit 10 homers in the first 29 games of the year, but the 29 games weren’t played by April 30.

Hey now, the MLB is finally actually trying to promote their young stars.  Let them cherry pick whatever stats they want.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, yark14 said:

Hey now, the MLB is finally actually trying to promote their young stars.  Let them cherry pick whatever stats they want.

To be clear, it’s an impressive accomplishment.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DenPA2002 said:

Do you think Gunnar us going to try and play 162 games? Do you think Cal's record ever crossed his mind? I am sure it did since I see them both in that commercial.

No, I don’t think he’s got any fantasies about Cal’s record.  Might he play all 162 this year?   I’m sure it could happen, but if I were Hyde I’d prefer to give him a day off every month or so once the weather heats up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, DenPA2002 said:

Do you think Gunnar us going to try and play 162 games? Do you think Cal's record ever crossed his mind? I am sure it did since I see them both in that commercial.

I don't think it's possible now with the way teams place value on players getting the occasional rest day. I don't see any future player even coming close to challenging Cal's consecutive games played record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...