Jump to content

Jordan Westburg 2024


interloper

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Hope Westy is alright.  

Pulling Norby and sending him to NY is the move the O’s have to make. Slam dunk. Now they may not activate him depending on how Westburg feels today. Norby might taxi around the team for this series. Or… we could send a reliever down and go with a 7 man pen to activate Norby. Then if Westburg hits the IL, just call that reliever back up. Vespi or Tate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Pulling Norby and sending him to NY is the move the O’s have to make. Slam dunk. Now they may not activate him depending on how Westburg feels today. Norby might taxi around the team for this series. Or… we could send a reliever down and go with a 7 man pen to activate Norby. Then if Westburg hits the IL, just call that reliever back up. Vespi or Tate. 

Vespi has already been optioned 5 times this year, so they’d risk putting him on waivers if they do it again.

They’d (should) probably just option Akin.

Edited by LookitsPuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Vespi has already been optioned 5 times this year, so they’d risk putting him on waivers if they do it again.

They’d (should) probably just option Akin.

We aren’t sending Akin down for 10 days when we have length uncertainty with our rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Vespi has already been optioned 5 times this year, so they’d risk putting him on waivers if they do it again.

 

According to Roch, Vespi has only been optioned 3 times. It didn't count when they sent him down after bringing him up as the 27th man for the DH. Here's what Roch wrote yesterday:

"Correction/clarification: Nick Vespi has been recalled four times and optioned three. Therefore, the Orioles can option him two more times before having to first pass him through waivers.

His inclusion on the Opening Day roster while Jacob Webb went on the paternity list counted. Serving as 27th man in St. Louis for the suspended game did not, which I also knew.

I miscounted while scrolling the transactions, which used the terms “recalled” and “optioned” rather than “added” and “returned,” as the Orioles wisely do. So yeah, it’s the transactions fault."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rm5678 said:

According to Roch, Vespi has only been optioned 3 times. It didn't count when they sent him down after bringing him up as the 27th man for the DH. Here's what Roch wrote yesterday:

"Correction/clarification: Nick Vespi has been recalled four times and optioned three. Therefore, the Orioles can option him two more times before having to first pass him through waivers.

His inclusion on the Opening Day roster while Jacob Webb went on the paternity list counted. Serving as 27th man in St. Louis for the suspended game did not, which I also knew.

I miscounted while scrolling the transactions, which used the terms “recalled” and “optioned” rather than “added” and “returned,” as the Orioles wisely do. So yeah, it’s the transactions fault."

 

Ah, that's odd. 

image.png.497593241d52763ecd3fd36a212af0ce.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Ah, that's odd. 

image.png.497593241d52763ecd3fd36a212af0ce.png

March 20th (pre-opening day) and May 23rd (27th man) don’t count.  However, we can really only option him one more time.  If we option Nick then recall him again, the next time we option him he’ll need to pass through waivers (I think Roch’s wording was a bit unclear here).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Warehouse said:

March 20th (pre-opening day) and May 23rd (27th man) don’t count.  However, we can really only option him one more time.  If we option Nick then recall him again, the next time we option him he’ll need to pass through waivers (I think Roch’s wording was a bit unclear here).

Wait I think I’m wrong here.  I think he can be optioned a fifth time without being exposed to waivers. After that, he’d need to pass through outright waivers as a sixth option wouldn’t be permitted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Warehouse said:

March 20th (pre-opening day) and May 23rd (27th man) don’t count.  However, we can really only option him one more time.  If we option Nick then recall him again, the next time we option him he’ll need to pass through waivers (I think Roch’s wording was a bit unclear here).

Is that the case, though? If the 5 options I mentioned are really 3 (now excluding before OD and 27th man), he can be optioned twice without being exposed to waivers. I thought it was 5 options but anything after that would expose him to waivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookitsPuck said:

 I thought it was 5 options but anything after that would expose him to waivers.

You're correct. From MLB site:

"Players may only be optioned five times per season; after that, it requires outright assignment waivers to assign the player to the Minor Leagues."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

A big 4 hit game. 2nd highest OPS on the team at .853. 

If we didn’t have Adley, or Gunnar, everyone would be walking around in Westburg jerseys. 

Westburg is not peak Bregman but he's a better current Bregman. He's gonna strike out a little but he doesnt have prolonged slumps. He's a grinder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is going to have a long and solid big league career. Not a super star, but one who puts together 4-5 WAR seasons over 10 years in the show. Exactly what every contending team needs to fill in behind the stars.  A Vern Stephens, George Kell, Gil Macdougald or Carl Furillo kind of player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldNewGuy said:

He is going to have a long and solid big league career. Not a super star, but one who puts together 4-5 WAR seasons over 10 years in the show. Exactly what every contending team needs to fill in behind the stars.  A Vern Stephens, George Kell, Gil Macdougald or Carl Furillo kind of player.

I thought I was old.  🙂

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...