Jump to content

Craig Kimbrel 2024


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Oh sweet, so they are just going to go short handed in the pen.

That sounds like a good idea.

Terrible move. They have indulged the veteran because he's a HoFer and will pay the price. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Oh sweet, so they are just going to go short handed in the pen.

That sounds like a good idea.

Kimbrel has pitched in 48% of our games so far.  How can this team make it 10 days without him? Seriously.  I know it's pile on Kimbrel day, but he is one of our best three relievers, and this is the biggest series of the season thus far.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Oh sweet, so they are just going to go short handed in the pen.

That sounds like a good idea.

He wasn't likely to pitch today anyway.  Why not see if he's OK to pitch in a day or two?  Not much harm there, can always retroactively IL him.  I mean (and this is directed at the board, not you necessarily) - he's pitching too much and Hyde is burning him out, or we can afford to give him a day off w/o putting him on the IL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Kimbrel has pitched in 48% of our games so far.  How can this team make it 10 days without him? Seriously.  I know it's pile on Kimbrel day, but he is one of our best three relievers, and this is the biggest series of the season thus far.   

As of now he may not even pitch for the first 2-3 games of the series. So at least for this series, it makes no sense.

This is also Elias being to SCEEEEARD to lose Baumann or Ramirez on waivers because you know they are so valuable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

18 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

And they optioned Tate to make room for Cionel.

Tate had just pitched back to back. He wasn't going to be available for at least two days so makes perfect sense to get a fresh arm in. Hopefully they are able to get some innings out of Ramirez today and then DFA him for another arm.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

And they optioned Tate to make room for Cionel.

I don't like this move at all. Orioles need a full bullpen for this series. It's going to be very interesting to see what pitcher gets the call if the ninth inning is a save situation.

Hoping Kimbrel isn't bs-ing the coaches and he really will be fine in a day or two.

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dtk9119 said:

As of now he may not even pitch for the first 2-3 games of the series. So at least for this series, it makes no sense.

This is also Elias being to SCEEEEARD to lose Baumann or Ramirez on waivers because you know they are so valuable.

Ramirez is a pitcher you don't want pitching in a game you want to win, so the O's are really 2 pitchers short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I don't like this move at all. Orioles need a full bullpen for this series. It's going to be very interesting to see what pitcher gets the call if the ninth inning is a save situation.

What don't you like? Tate wouldn't be available until game 3 at the earliest, so optioning him for a fresh arm increases the number we have available. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

He wasn't likely to pitch today anyway.  Why not see if he's OK to pitch in a day or two?  Not much harm there, can always retroactively IL him.  I mean (and this is directed at the board, not you necessarily) - he's pitching too much and Hyde is burning him out, or we can afford to give him a day off w/o putting him on the IL?

When weighing the risk and reward of the situation...  IMO, our need to have a full staff of arms to eat innings in the bullpen to better spread the workload outweighs waiting for 2 or 3 days and hoping that Kimbrel will bounce right back to form and isn't nursing an injury. 

Were it me deciding, he'd spending the next week and a half on the IL, so that I'm not unnecessarily overtaxing the rest of the guys in the pen.  But that's just me.  Clearly I'm not the one being paid the big bucks to make the call. 

Edited by Morgan423
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

Feels like a matter of time before that changes to "Craig Kimbrel will go on the IL retroactive to May 29."

Retroactive to the IL, on a future date?

Maybe Kimbrel's real problem is that he wasn't properly handling the plutonium that he's putting in his flux capacitor.  😉

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...