Jump to content

David Rubenstein 2024


Recommended Posts

I watched the Kevin Hart Netflix special last night.  He was receiving the Mark Twain award at the Kennedy Center. Ruby got a little face time in the audience at the beginning of the show.  Sitting right up front.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I guarantee you anything he said about extensions would be brought up when player X was traded away or allowed to walk.

Nats fans were fine about Soto and Harper because they knew the club tried. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, baltfan said:

Nats fans were fine about Soto and Harper because they knew the club tried. 

Soto turning down 400M wasn't on the Gnats. That is a huge sum of money, yeah. They didn't try to lowball him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malike said:

Soto turning down 400M wasn't on the Gnats. That is a huge sum of money, yeah. They didn't try to lowball him.

Agreed. My point was that the fans knew the Nats were trying.  The Orioles have not tried.  People can say that we don’t know but Gunnar was asked and said there were no talks that he had any knowledge of.  No player should be upset if the Orioles came out and said they wanted some extensions.  And the fans are going to be happy they are at least trying. Right now we have no evidence they have even tried.  This is why many, including some defending saying nothing, were upset with Angelos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, baltfan said:

Agreed. My point was that the fans knew the Nats were trying.  The Orioles have not tried.  People can say that we don’t know but Gunnar was asked and said there were no talks that he had any knowledge of.  No player should be upset if the Orioles came out and said they wanted some extensions.  And the fans are going to be happy they are at least trying. Right now we have no evidence they have even tried.  This is why many, including some defending saying nothing, were upset with Angelos. 

Boras has never had a guy sign a long-term extension with 2 years of service time or less. I'm sure it's something they will look long and hard at after the season. I don't expect that to change in May of this year, but I do think that if they make an offer that he turns down, people won't think they lowballed him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, baltfan said:

Agreed. My point was that the fans knew the Nats were trying.  The Orioles have not tried.  People can say that we don’t know but Gunnar was asked and said there were no talks that he had any knowledge of.  No player should be upset if the Orioles came out and said they wanted some extensions.  And the fans are going to be happy they are at least trying. Right now we have no evidence they have even tried.  This is why many, including some defending saying nothing, were upset with Angelos. 

If the bolded is true, they are most likely talking to someone (if not Gunnar - Adley). Rubenstein is no idiot (like John Angelos was). He knows that the long term viability from a business standpoint is not in allowing #35 and #2 get away and go elsewhere. For those who have been to games this season, it is clear to see from all of those jerseys around the stadium who the fans have fallen in love with. Extensions are standard operating procedure in MLB currently (even for the lowest budget teams not name Athletics). The Orioles under JA were operating as an outlier. That trend is very unlikely to continue under Rubenstien. He appears to care too much to allow that to happen.

IMO the Orioles must retain at least one of Gunnar or Adley AND others if they want to grow their fanbase in the market. You have to have a face or 2 of the franchise to sell and for people to continue to come see and fall in love with. Long gone are the days when people are simply loyal to institutions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

If the bolded is true, they are most likely talking to someone (if not Gunnar - Adley). Rubenstein is no idiot (like John Angelos was). He knows that the long term viability from a business standpoint is not in allowing #35 and #2 get away and go elsewhere. For those who have been to games this season, it is clear to see from all of those jerseys around the stadium who the fans have fallen in love with. Extensions are standard operating procedure in MLB currently (even for the lowest budget teams not name Athletics). The Orioles under JA were operating as an outlier. That trend is very unlikely to continue under Rubenstien. He appears to care too much to allow that to happen.

IMO the Orioles must retain at least one of Gunnar or Adley AND others if they want to grow their fanbase in the market. You have to have a face or 2 of the franchise to sell and for people to continue to come see and fall in love with. Long gone are the days when people are simply loyal to institutions. 

Fans like winning more than the name on the back of the jersey.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, emmett16 said:

Fans like winning more than the name on the back of the jersey.  

I know that we have a difference of opinion as it relates to player retention/extensions.

But I think we both can acknowledge that the name on the back of the jersey impacts winning (i.e. star/great players).

I can name different models when extensions/big time FA signing have lead to increased attendance/marketplace relevance/fan engagement.

How many models/examples can you name when a team had constant turnover, didn’t retain superstars/had an ongoing rebuild/reload/whatever you want to call it; and that lead to robust community engagement, high fan attendance/ticket sales, and growing merch sales?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, baltfan said:

Notably nothing about seeking extensions.  There is no reason he can’t go on the record re wanting this. 

I’m fine with what DR keeps saying — maybe others will eventually believe him — that he is leaving baseball decisions to his baseball people. And his GM doesn’t like to tip his hand about anything, especially contracts.

I think these guys like winning and seem to like their team. They will make mistakes, but I do have faith they want the O’s to be as good as they can be with the resources they have. Of course I hope they sign some of our young guys and expand the payroll. I just don’t need promises in an interview. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

I know that we have a difference of opinion as it relates to player retention/extensions.

But I think we both can acknowledge that the name on the back of the jersey impacts winning (i.e. star/great players).

I can name different models when extensions/big time FA signing have lead to increased attendance/marketplace relevance/fan engagement.

How many models/examples can you name when a team had constant turnover, didn’t retain superstars/had an ongoing rebuild/reload/whatever you want to call it; and that lead to robust community engagement, high fan attendance/ticket sales, and growing merch sales?

First thing that comes to mind is Just about everybody successful college basketball team.  Duke, Kentucky, UConn, etc.  turnover every year, win every year, massive attendance and merch sales.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

First thing that comes to mind is Just about everybody successful college basketball team.  Duke, Kentucky, UConn, etc.  turnover every year, win every year, massive attendance and merch sales.  

College has a different relationship with fans/students especially alumni who are forever connected to that particular school regardless of the sports team.

I was talking about professional American sports. I can’t think of a single instance where that model produces great revenue, fan engagement, attendance, relevance in the market.

As a matter of fact, people are not institution loyal when it comes to almost any aspect of life anymore - (brands, religion, music, fashion, marriage, etc). Sports are no different IMO.

Furthermore, when it comes to entertainment, politics, religion, etc for the consumer/customer for them it’s all about how it makes them feel. If people start carrying a bunch of “anxiety” because we continue to lose star players or the angst continues to build regarding “will we resign players x and y” it will begin to be reflective in attendance/market place engagement.

Right now the Orioles are a hot brand in the community and it feels good being a fan because everything is going so well. But you start allowing Adleys and Gunnars to walk and that will change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

First thing that comes to mind is Just about everybody successful college basketball team.  Duke, Kentucky, UConn, etc.  turnover every year, win every year, massive attendance and merch sales.  

Not apples to apples. College sports fans know going in that every player is only there for a limited time. You still knew you were getting the entire collegiate career of those players (before the recent changes in transfer rules, anyway). Your favorite star wasn't getting poached by Duke mid-career (again, before the transfer portal). There's a big difference between that fan experience and knowing that all your best players will be lured away by teams with deeper pockets after a few years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, deward said:

Not apples to apples. College sports fans know going in that every player is only there for a limited time. You still knew you were getting the entire collegiate career of those players (before the recent changes in transfer rules, anyway). Your favorite star wasn't getting poached by Duke mid-career (again, before the transfer portal). There's a big difference between that fan experience and knowing that all your best players will be lured away by teams with deeper pockets after a few years. 

 

20 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

College has a different relationship with fans/students especially alumni who are forever connected to that particular school regardless of the sports team.

I was talking about professional American sports. I can’t think of a single instance where that model produces great revenue, fan engagement, attendance, relevance in the market.

As a matter of fact, people are not institution loyal when it comes to almost any aspect of life anymore - (brands, religion, music, fashion, marriage, etc). Sports are no different IMO.

Furthermore, when it comes to entertainment, politics, religion, etc for the consumer/customer for them it’s all about how it makes them feel. If people start carrying a bunch of “anxiety” because we continue to lose star players or the angst continues to build regarding “will we resign players x and y” it will begin to be reflective in attendance/market place engagement.

Right now the Orioles are a hot brand in the community and it feels good being a fan because everything is going so well. But you start allowing Adleys and Gunnars to walk and that will change. 

The point is winning, not the players, builds the brand.  If the team wins the brand will grow.  Plain and simple.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...