Jump to content

Some 9x stats


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I just read an article at MLBTraderumors about the current Rule 5 guys, and in mentioning past Rule 5 successes, Steve Adams ignored Tony Taters… shame on him!

On the flip side, poor Jackson Holliday is projected for 9 singles and damn little else.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

I like this game!

Grayson Rodriguez 27 Wins 216 IP 243 SO

Corbin Burnes 18 Wins 208.8 225 SO

Craig Kimbrel 72 IP 45 SV 126 SO

It's all fun and games until:

Jackson Holliday: .077/.040/.117 36 runs 9 RBI 9 H 9 BB 225 Ks (-) 3.6 rWAR

Austin Hays: .136/.073/.210 18 Runs 18 RBI 27 H 27 BB 199 Ks (-) 9 rWAR

Edited by Pickles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the Pittsburgh series, the O's were 5-4 and I told my wife that besides the first 2 games, many of the players in the line-up haven't started hitting well, yet.  I said, "Just wait until all the players in the line-up wake up."  Well, they were wide awake for the next nine games.  Hopefully, this continues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

I like this game!

Grayson Rodriguez 27 Wins 216 IP 243 SO

Corbin Burnes 18 Wins 208.8 225 SO

Craig Kimbrel 72 IP 45 SV 126 SO

Don't forget about Kimbrel's 27 wins and 0 losses as a reliever.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The consecutive 3 HR games streak has the Team ISO at .201.

wRC+ by Bats is third to ATL-HOU.     The Astros maybe feel like the 2024 championship season doesn't officially begin until Justin Verlander's personal opening day in DC tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just my 2 cents, but I like the 1/9.  The 10-game intervals was a little too frequent, but 18 games seems like a decent enough sample size to get some rough trends.

 

And holy crap we have 4/9 guys in our lineup that are hotter than the Sun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

The season is exactly 1/9 over, so you can just multiply any cumulative stat by 9 to see how it projects over a full season.  That results in the O’s protecting to 108 wins, scoring 936 runs (+129 over last year) while allowing 693 (+15 over last year).   

On an individual level:

Gunnar 117 runs, 135 RBI, 54 HR, 8.1 rWAR

Westburg 99 runs, 126 RBI, 36 HR, 9.0 rWAR

Mullins 126 runs, 135 RBI, 45 HR, 8.1 rWAR

Santander 99 runs, 135 RBI, 36 HR, -0.9 rWAR (!)

Cowser 72 runs, 135 RBI, 36 HR, 9.9 rWAR

Mountcastle and O’Hearn also are projecting out to 6.3 rWAR, and Adley 4.5.

Some folks may remember that last year I posted a thread where I was tracking WAR and other stats every 18 games.  Going back, we never had an offensive segment last season with as many good performances as this last one.  (I am planning a similar thread this season, but in 27 game segments, as 18 just seemed a little too frequent.)

I'll be the pedantic one and point out that it's not really a projection to multiply 1/9th of the season by nine and come up with a full season's performance. Because 1/9th of the season is almost certainly not representative of the talent or expected performance of the players in question. 

To get a true projection you should take a little less than 8/9ths of your preseason projection, add in what they've done since opening day, and then toss in the little bit of additional knowledge we've gotten from the past 18 games.

If you thought Jordan Westburg was a 2.5-win player on opening day, it's probably reasonable to think he's a 2.7 win player today.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Hallas said:

Just my 2 cents, but I like the 1/9.  The 10-game intervals was a little too frequent, but 18 games seems like a decent enough sample size to get some rough trends.

Friendly reminder that even the quickest numbers to show significance like strikeout and FB rates take 60-100 at bats to become more signal than noise. And things like SLG and OBP take the better part of half a season before you can start trusting them. Batting average is well over the number of PAs anyone has ever gotten in a season.

Drungo's First Rule (or at least some rule of mine): Never trust anything before Memorial Day. And don't get too comfortable until well after July 4th.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

So, what's our total team WAR now and what does it project to? 

A reasonable opening day projection for the Orioles was probably 92ish wins, or about 44 WAR. Starting 12-6 you could reasonably assume that their EOY projection is something like 93 or 94 wins. 

Baseball reference says the team WAR is currently 6.2. So that would work out to something in the neighborhood of 40 for the rest of the schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...