Jump to content

Has a relief pitcher ever won a Gold Glove?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Because honestly, Cano is as good a defensive pitcher as I’ve seen.   He induces a lot of grounders and knows he’s got to be ready to field balls, and he does, with catlike quickness and athleticism.  

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

Found this post - https://blogs.fangraphs.com/early-gold-glove-contenders-relief-pitchers/

Looked at 2012-2023 and I don't see any relievers.

OK, so it’s never happened.  FWIW, last year Cano had 20 assists, tied for 10th in MLB.  All nine ahead of him threw at least 52 innings more than Cano’s 72.  Cano had far more assists per inning than anyone ahead of him on the list.  And, he made no errors.  I’m not going to press the GG case too hard, but I just wanted to call out his excellence as a defender.  

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said something about his defense early last year. He is a fantastic defender. Very quick off the mound to pounce on balls. Early on last year I think his throwing was a little off but generally the fielder caught the ball. Seems like he’s ironed that part out as well. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love this thread.  It would be great if this narrative about Cano being a gold glover could make its way to an influential site like Fangraphs or other places.  Cano is an excellent athlete and doesn't get the credit for it.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Because honestly, Cano is as good a defensive pitcher as I’ve seen.   He induces a lot of grounders and knows he’s got to be ready to field balls, and he does, with catlike quickness and athleticism.  

If Palmiero can win one with 28 games played at 1B, I'd think they should qualify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't giving Gold Gloves to relief pitchers further devalue the award?

I mean, a starter who is a position player is in nearly every game, for 9 innings a game.  You can't say that a relief pitcher who's in games for 2-8 innings a week is equally worthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, baltfan said:

I love this thread.  It would be great if this narrative about Cano being a gold glover could make its way to an influential site like Fangraphs or other places.  Cano is an excellent athlete and doesn't get the credit for it.  

This is what is needed. O's fans, make it a campaign. Call in to radio shows, comment on articles, email, text etc... on national sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Morgan423 said:

Wouldn't giving Gold Gloves to relief pitchers further devalue the award?

I mean, a starter who is a position player is in nearly every game, for 9 innings a game.  You can't say that a relief pitcher who's in games for 2-8 innings a week is equally worthy. 

Not many starters pitch 6 innings a game these days much less 9.  However, it would seem likely that there would always be at least one successful starter that would get more votes than a reliever because the starter would have 3x the chances.  It is always a good discussion when a dominant reliever is considered for Cy Young.  Really, a GG seems more difficult to win.

Edited by JimGinSP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Morgan423 said:

Wouldn't giving Gold Gloves to relief pitchers further devalue the award?

I mean, a starter who is a position player is in nearly every game, for 9 innings a game.  You can't say that a relief pitcher who's in games for 2-8 innings a week is equally worthy. 

I think that Gold Gloves for pitchers are:

a) a little silly

b) for most of the history of the award based on not much more than reading chicken entrails

Does anyone who's thought about this for more than eight second really believe that Greg Maddux and Jim Kaat were actually the very best fielding pitchers in the league for 15 or 17 or whatever straight years? That they never had an off year, and all that time legitimately beat out the other 50 or 100 starting pitchers in the league? That's as absurd as someone leading the league in homers for 17 straight years, or in putouts at shortstop, or in OPS for 17 straight years. Nobody, not Ruth, not Aaron, not Mays, not Mantle, not Trout... none of them did anything like that.

So, devalue? It's almost a made-up award anyway.

Anyone want to guess John Means' career high in fielding chances in a season? 100? 50? Nope, 15. Means was responsible for five putouts and 10 assists in 155 innings in 2019. Or one chance per 10 innings, give or take. Mark Reynolds, even in the midst of his Legally Blind phase, never fielded fewer than twice that number of balls per game.

Now... Cano did field 3.1 chances per nine innings last year, and has never made an error. He was involved in 25 successful plays in the field in 2023. But I still think he has essentially no chance at a Gold Glove. But I guess weirder things have happened.

What he'd be up against is first nobody really has a good idea which pitchers are great at fielding, but also that someone like Patrick Corbin of the Nats fielded twice as many balls as Cano last year because he's out there so much longer. And I'm not sure anyone is going to buy into the idea of weighting pitcher fielding chances by leverage index for relievers.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

Because honestly, Cano is as a defensive pitcher as I’ve seen.   He induces a lot of grounders and knows he’s got to be ready to field balls, and he does, with catlike quickness and athleticism.  

Yea his asisist last night was impressive. Those are the type of plays that get some recognition, not that a relief pitcher has much of a shot at winning a GG. Seems unlikely even though Cano could get 70 innings again this year.  Make a few more plays like that and then it becomes a situation IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing I don't like about Cano's fielding is that sometimes when he fields balls, usually little dribblers beyond the catcher's range, and then throws off-balance, I respond instinctively by saying (aloud or to myself) "Don't throw it" because there seems to be no chance for an out. But he swoops in, makes an accurate 90 MPH throw, and gets the out.

So I have to confront the fact that I was wrong and unable to update my split-second reaction by realizing it's a play I've seen Cano make. I don't like that.

The guy's amazing.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...