Jump to content

That pesky chemistry thing


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

I don't really have an opinion (til now) on Papelbon, but I commend him for saying what probably everyone else was thinking. Manny is a flake, and plays at all or at least plays hard, when he damn well feels like it. Sure he is a game changer, but only when he feels like it.

Maybe you could argue it in the field or the base paths, but there is no way you could argue it with his bat, and that's where his value is.

Papelbon is a dope anyway, so he could say that Derek Jeter is the devil and I would disagree vehemently.

And I have to agree with the "cancer, Lester" part as well. That could be questionable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I was thinking. I'd like to see Lester light him up for that. You don't throw that kind of stuff around when your teammate and one of your better pitchers has survived cancer and worked hard to get back to the game.

I honestly think Lester really is more intelligent than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Papelbon is annoying. Your team is really strong if one player can destory the entire team chemistry. I really hope Boston doesn't make the playoffs. I rather the Yankees make it over them.

I'm sorry, but I can't back you up here. You'd rather the Yankees, after spending almost half a billion dollars on free agents this offseason, make it over the Red Sox?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but I can't back you up here. You'd rather the Yankees, after spending almost half a billion dollars on free agents this offseason, make it over the Red Sox?

Yes. And it isn't even close anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team chemistry with Manny was so bad that they only made the playoffs in 4 of his 7 years there (if you don't count last year), and won just 2 of the Franchise's 7 world championships.

He also selfishly led the team in OPS in just 5 of those 7 years. He also has a pathetic .949 OPS in postseason play with only 28 homeruns in 378 at bats.

Yep, I bet team chemistry sucked with all that success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the big problem with the whole "Manny was hurting the team" argument.

During the time they were so desperate to trade him:

July: 11-13, 110 RS, 100 RA (17-10, 147 RS, 118 RA monthly average the remaining five months)

Team offense

 I Split          G    PA    AB    R    H   2B  3B  HR  RBI  BB  IBB  SO  HBP  SH  SF ROE GDP  SB   CS   BA   OBP   SLG   OPS  BAbip sOPS+ tOPS+ Split+-+------------+----+-----+-----+----+----+---+---+---+----+----+---+----+---+---+---+---+---+----+---+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------------+  July          242   940   817  110  222  46   5  18  105   93   8  159  12   6  12   6  17    8   8  .272  .350  .406  .756  .313   100    89 July         

Ramirez offense

 I Split         G   GS  PA  AB  R   H  2B 3B HR RBI  BB IBB  SO HBP  SH  SF ROE GDP  SB CS   BA   OBP   SLG   OPS  BAbip sOPS+ tOPS+ Split+-+------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+--+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------------+  July          22  21  93  75  18  26  6  0  4  16  14   3  15   4   0   0   1   2   0  0  .347  .473  .587 1.060  .393   179   108 July         

He was really carrying the team for that month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric Young get's it right.

It's very interesting that none of the team veterans, like Jason Varitek or David Ortiz, came out and trashed Manny. They know there is no reason to talk trash about a player who is no longer on the team and also because they respect that they won two World Series in large part because of Manny's contributions. There is no way they win those titles without him, and the veterans know that.

This game is about having a long memory, and the veteran leadership on the Red Sox realizes that trashing Manny serves no purpose except to sully a person who was a good enough teammate to help them win two titles. Papelbon should step back and understand that sometimes it isn't worth it to get a quick sound bite when baseball's unspoken rules are in play.

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...